Advancing the Sensitivity Frontier in digital contact tracing: Comparative analysis of proposed methods toward maximized utility
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries adopted Digital Contact Tracing (DCT) technology to control infections. However, the widely-used Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)-based DCT requires both the infected individual and the contact to have the application activated to detect exposure. Forcing citiz...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Informatics in Medicine Unlocked |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352914825000103 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries adopted Digital Contact Tracing (DCT) technology to control infections. However, the widely-used Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)-based DCT requires both the infected individual and the contact to have the application activated to detect exposure. Forcing citizens to install the DCT application could compromise their privacy. Therefore, to make DCT a truly usable tool, it is crucial to develop a DCT system that possesses high sensitivity, without depending on the application usage rate.The Computation of Infection Risk via Confidential Locational Entries (CIRCLE) is a DCT method that utilizes connection logs from mobile phone base stations, theoretically offering much higher sensitivity than BLE-based DCT. However, its real performance has not been proven, and thus, this paper estimates the sensitivity and specificity of both BLE-based DCT and CIRCLE in a comparative setting. The estimation combines simulated movement patterns of residents with real-world data from app usage in Japan, utilizing both simulation and numerical modeling, with missing data supplemented through sensitivity analysis.The sensitivity of BLE-based DCT is severely limited by the application’s usage rate, with an estimated baseline of just 10.9%, and even under highly optimistic assumptions, it only reaches 27.0%. In contrast, CIRCLE demonstrated a significantly higher sensitivity of 85.6%, greatly surpassing BLE-based DCT. The specificity of CIRCLE, though, decreased as the number of infected individuals increased, dropping to less than half of BLE-based DCT’s specificity during widespread infection. The BLE-based DCT used during the pandemic suffers from low sensitivity. While CIRCLE has specificity challenges, it provides exceptionally high sensitivity. Integrating these methods could redefine the design of digital contact tracing, leading to better utility for future infection control. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-9148 |