Appartenenze ed esclusioni
From the second half of the 16th century onwards, Venice ordered the cities of its mainland dominions (Terraferma) to adopt substantial legislation and to create special magistrates aimed at countering the dangers posed by »disruptors of the quiet and peaceful life«: foreigners, beggars, pauperes,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/index.php/rg/article/view/92 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823859247543222272 |
---|---|
author | Frederica Paletti |
author_facet | Frederica Paletti |
author_sort | Frederica Paletti |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
From the second half of the 16th century onwards, Venice ordered the cities of its mainland dominions (Terraferma) to adopt substantial legislation and to create special magistrates aimed at countering the dangers posed by »disruptors of the quiet and peaceful life«: foreigners, beggars, pauperes, vagrants and bandits. The provisions of the decrees Venice sent to the Terraferma inevitably intertwined with the ius proprium already in force in the individual civitates.
The subjects receiving this copious regulatory production did not correspond to a single legal type, nor did they enjoy the same legal status, since the terms employed by the Venetian and mainland legislation to indicate them were polysemic, the result and expression of different regional historical-social moments and dynamics.
In the decades crucial to the formation of modern states, the intensifying iurisdictio exercised by Venice translated in its mainland territories into an increasing concern with what we might call the »other side of citizenship«. A growing number of obligations, prohibitions, exclusionary measures and, much more rarely, privileges were set up by the communities to deal with non-residents and other marginal groups and individuals. The investigation of the contents of these measures provides a vivid insight into the different forms that the concept of »citizenship«, understood as a link that binds the individual to the political community, received in those decades. Its complex, multiple layers of meaning can only be grasped when the institutional and legal relations between Venice and the cities of the Terraferma are taken into account.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-591b6190997f44b4918a1ef33fbb95db |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1619-4993 2195-9617 |
language | deu |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory |
record_format | Article |
series | Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History |
spelling | doaj-art-591b6190997f44b4918a1ef33fbb95db2025-02-11T06:08:45ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172021-11-0129Appartenenze ed esclusioniFrederica Paletti0Università degli Studi di Brescia From the second half of the 16th century onwards, Venice ordered the cities of its mainland dominions (Terraferma) to adopt substantial legislation and to create special magistrates aimed at countering the dangers posed by »disruptors of the quiet and peaceful life«: foreigners, beggars, pauperes, vagrants and bandits. The provisions of the decrees Venice sent to the Terraferma inevitably intertwined with the ius proprium already in force in the individual civitates. The subjects receiving this copious regulatory production did not correspond to a single legal type, nor did they enjoy the same legal status, since the terms employed by the Venetian and mainland legislation to indicate them were polysemic, the result and expression of different regional historical-social moments and dynamics. In the decades crucial to the formation of modern states, the intensifying iurisdictio exercised by Venice translated in its mainland territories into an increasing concern with what we might call the »other side of citizenship«. A growing number of obligations, prohibitions, exclusionary measures and, much more rarely, privileges were set up by the communities to deal with non-residents and other marginal groups and individuals. The investigation of the contents of these measures provides a vivid insight into the different forms that the concept of »citizenship«, understood as a link that binds the individual to the political community, received in those decades. Its complex, multiple layers of meaning can only be grasped when the institutional and legal relations between Venice and the cities of the Terraferma are taken into account. https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/index.php/rg/article/view/92citizenshiplegal statusVeniceVenetian Terraferma16th century |
spellingShingle | Frederica Paletti Appartenenze ed esclusioni Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History citizenship legal status Venice Venetian Terraferma 16th century |
title | Appartenenze ed esclusioni |
title_full | Appartenenze ed esclusioni |
title_fullStr | Appartenenze ed esclusioni |
title_full_unstemmed | Appartenenze ed esclusioni |
title_short | Appartenenze ed esclusioni |
title_sort | appartenenze ed esclusioni |
topic | citizenship legal status Venice Venetian Terraferma 16th century |
url | https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/index.php/rg/article/view/92 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fredericapaletti appartenenzeedesclusioni |