Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study

Introduction: The minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty (MBGEU) is our novel technique of combining direct vision internal urethrotomy with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. We assessed success at 30-months of follow-up. Secondary objectives were to compare the changes in the Amer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abhay Singh Gaur, Vivek Tarigopula, Swarnendu Mandal, Pavithra Ayyanar, Suvendu Purkait, Kirti Singh, C. Sabique, Prasant Nayak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-04-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_519_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849471752902541312
author Abhay Singh Gaur
Vivek Tarigopula
Swarnendu Mandal
Pavithra Ayyanar
Suvendu Purkait
Kirti Singh
C. Sabique
Prasant Nayak
author_facet Abhay Singh Gaur
Vivek Tarigopula
Swarnendu Mandal
Pavithra Ayyanar
Suvendu Purkait
Kirti Singh
C. Sabique
Prasant Nayak
author_sort Abhay Singh Gaur
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty (MBGEU) is our novel technique of combining direct vision internal urethrotomy with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. We assessed success at 30-months of follow-up. Secondary objectives were to compare the changes in the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, peak flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residue (PVR) postoperatively. Methods: This pilot study (CTRI/2021/09/036651) was conducted at a tertiary-care center and included 30 male patients with primary, <2 cm bulbar urethral strictures. A 1 cm × 1 cm buccal mucosal graft was harvested, minced, centrifuged, and suspended in fibrin glue. After a cold knife urethrotomy, a 12-Fr Foley was placed. An 11-Fr cystourethroscope was passed by the side of the catheter, and the suspension was instilled through a 5-Fr ureteric catheter over the urethrotomy site. Results: The success rate of MBGEU was 93.33% at 12 months, 90% at 18 months, 83.3% at 24 months, and 76.6% at 30 months. The stricture recurred in seven patients. The AUA score reduced by 15, 15, 16, 16, 15.5, and 15.5 points from the baseline at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months (P < 0.01). There was a significant increase in the Qmax by 17 ml/s and a significant reduction in the PVR by 73.5 ml at 30 months (P < 0.01). No donor site morbidity was seen. There were no postoperative complications. Conclusion: The medium-term success of MBGEU is encouraging. However, a longer follow-up and further studies with a larger sample size and a comparative arm are required.
format Article
id doaj-art-58f4b5271a394b089554ad7c4ea243ba
institution Kabale University
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj-art-58f4b5271a394b089554ad7c4ea243ba2025-08-20T03:24:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242025-04-0141213113610.4103/iju.iju_519_24Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot studyAbhay Singh GaurVivek TarigopulaSwarnendu MandalPavithra AyyanarSuvendu PurkaitKirti SinghC. SabiquePrasant NayakIntroduction: The minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty (MBGEU) is our novel technique of combining direct vision internal urethrotomy with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. We assessed success at 30-months of follow-up. Secondary objectives were to compare the changes in the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, peak flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residue (PVR) postoperatively. Methods: This pilot study (CTRI/2021/09/036651) was conducted at a tertiary-care center and included 30 male patients with primary, <2 cm bulbar urethral strictures. A 1 cm × 1 cm buccal mucosal graft was harvested, minced, centrifuged, and suspended in fibrin glue. After a cold knife urethrotomy, a 12-Fr Foley was placed. An 11-Fr cystourethroscope was passed by the side of the catheter, and the suspension was instilled through a 5-Fr ureteric catheter over the urethrotomy site. Results: The success rate of MBGEU was 93.33% at 12 months, 90% at 18 months, 83.3% at 24 months, and 76.6% at 30 months. The stricture recurred in seven patients. The AUA score reduced by 15, 15, 16, 16, 15.5, and 15.5 points from the baseline at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months (P < 0.01). There was a significant increase in the Qmax by 17 ml/s and a significant reduction in the PVR by 73.5 ml at 30 months (P < 0.01). No donor site morbidity was seen. There were no postoperative complications. Conclusion: The medium-term success of MBGEU is encouraging. However, a longer follow-up and further studies with a larger sample size and a comparative arm are required.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_519_24
spellingShingle Abhay Singh Gaur
Vivek Tarigopula
Swarnendu Mandal
Pavithra Ayyanar
Suvendu Purkait
Kirti Singh
C. Sabique
Prasant Nayak
Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study
Indian Journal of Urology
title Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study
title_full Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study
title_fullStr Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study
title_short Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study
title_sort modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty a pilot study
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/iju.iju_519_24
work_keys_str_mv AT abhaysinghgaur modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy
AT vivektarigopula modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy
AT swarnendumandal modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy
AT pavithraayyanar modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy
AT suvendupurkait modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy
AT kirtisingh modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy
AT csabique modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy
AT prasantnayak modificationofmincedbuccalmucosalgraftendourethralurethroplastyapilotstudy