Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana Stream

The ‘relational turn’, proposed for the sustainability sciences, provides an ontological and methodological means to move beyond positivist portrayals of ecological restoration in social-ecological systems towards what we call relational restoration. The proposed restoration of Grant Creek, a degrad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seamus R. Land, Daniel T. Spencer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Ecosystems and People
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26395916.2025.2502472
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850153395447398400
author Seamus R. Land
Daniel T. Spencer
author_facet Seamus R. Land
Daniel T. Spencer
author_sort Seamus R. Land
collection DOAJ
description The ‘relational turn’, proposed for the sustainability sciences, provides an ontological and methodological means to move beyond positivist portrayals of ecological restoration in social-ecological systems towards what we call relational restoration. The proposed restoration of Grant Creek, a degraded stream near Missoula, Montana, is a socially rich and ecologically dynamic case study of restoration planning. This essay combines biophysical and sociological data to demonstrate that relational approaches and understandings of nature-human connectedness offer improved restoration opportunities, both in terms of ecological markers and for projects of conflict resolution and human justice. To gain a more holistic, dynamic understanding of the nature-human connectedness in the Grant Creek watershed, we combined a biophysical NRCS Riparian Assessment on 11 miles of stream with 20 in-depth interviews with landowners. We argue that local ecological knowledge, ethics, and stewardship practices need to be examined in conversation with traditional environmental science and management during restoration planning. The findings highlight the value of investigating restoration planning through a relational approach, offering a path through which the practice of ER, as conceived by the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, might achieve several important outcomes: operationalizing social-ecological dynamics for local planning processes, identifying existing local relational dynamics, describing root causes of degradation, and creating space for more inclusive collaborative restoration processes. We conclude with caution, noting that despite these innovations, relational restoration needs additional justice considerations to properly consider North American Indigenous history and sovereignty.
format Article
id doaj-art-58ca9b1fc58e4931bfc5f3a625fd5beb
institution OA Journals
issn 2639-5908
2639-5916
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Ecosystems and People
spelling doaj-art-58ca9b1fc58e4931bfc5f3a625fd5beb2025-08-20T02:25:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEcosystems and People2639-59082639-59162025-12-0121110.1080/26395916.2025.2502472Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana StreamSeamus R. Land0Daniel T. Spencer1Environmental Studies, University of Montana, Missoula, USAEmeritus, Environmental Studies, University of Montana, Missoula, USAThe ‘relational turn’, proposed for the sustainability sciences, provides an ontological and methodological means to move beyond positivist portrayals of ecological restoration in social-ecological systems towards what we call relational restoration. The proposed restoration of Grant Creek, a degraded stream near Missoula, Montana, is a socially rich and ecologically dynamic case study of restoration planning. This essay combines biophysical and sociological data to demonstrate that relational approaches and understandings of nature-human connectedness offer improved restoration opportunities, both in terms of ecological markers and for projects of conflict resolution and human justice. To gain a more holistic, dynamic understanding of the nature-human connectedness in the Grant Creek watershed, we combined a biophysical NRCS Riparian Assessment on 11 miles of stream with 20 in-depth interviews with landowners. We argue that local ecological knowledge, ethics, and stewardship practices need to be examined in conversation with traditional environmental science and management during restoration planning. The findings highlight the value of investigating restoration planning through a relational approach, offering a path through which the practice of ER, as conceived by the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, might achieve several important outcomes: operationalizing social-ecological dynamics for local planning processes, identifying existing local relational dynamics, describing root causes of degradation, and creating space for more inclusive collaborative restoration processes. We conclude with caution, noting that despite these innovations, relational restoration needs additional justice considerations to properly consider North American Indigenous history and sovereignty.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26395916.2025.2502472Paula NovoEcological restorationrelational valuescommunity-based restorationcollaborative governanceenvironmental justice
spellingShingle Seamus R. Land
Daniel T. Spencer
Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana Stream
Ecosystems and People
Paula Novo
Ecological restoration
relational values
community-based restoration
collaborative governance
environmental justice
title Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana Stream
title_full Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana Stream
title_fullStr Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana Stream
title_full_unstemmed Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana Stream
title_short Re-storying Grant Creek: relational restoration on a degraded Montana Stream
title_sort re storying grant creek relational restoration on a degraded montana stream
topic Paula Novo
Ecological restoration
relational values
community-based restoration
collaborative governance
environmental justice
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26395916.2025.2502472
work_keys_str_mv AT seamusrland restoryinggrantcreekrelationalrestorationonadegradedmontanastream
AT danieltspencer restoryinggrantcreekrelationalrestorationonadegradedmontanastream