Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses

BackgroundLesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) individuals faced greater mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic than binary-gender heterosexual (non-LGBTQ+) adults. The Together for Wellness/Juntos por Nuestro Bienestar website w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalia Ramos, Skylar Jones, Lily Zhang, Miriam Nuño, Benita Ramsey, Dannie Ceseña, Alyssa Mireles, Kenneth Wells
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-07-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e67082
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849701980364079104
author Natalia Ramos
Skylar Jones
Lily Zhang
Miriam Nuño
Benita Ramsey
Dannie Ceseña
Alyssa Mireles
Kenneth Wells
author_facet Natalia Ramos
Skylar Jones
Lily Zhang
Miriam Nuño
Benita Ramsey
Dannie Ceseña
Alyssa Mireles
Kenneth Wells
author_sort Natalia Ramos
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundLesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) individuals faced greater mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic than binary-gender heterosexual (non-LGBTQ+) adults. The Together for Wellness/Juntos por Nuestro Bienestar website with free well-being resources, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic with partner input, included LGBTQ+ resources. A pilot evaluation among adults (aged ≥18 years) found engagement with and use of the website 4 to 6 weeks before follow-up was associated with reduced (pretest-posttest) depression. Results for LGBTQ+ participants were not reported. ObjectiveThis study describes baseline depression, anxiety, and website engagement for LGBTQ+ compared with non-LGBTQ+ adults and pretest-posttest changes in depression and anxiety (the primary outcome). MethodsCommunity partners invited health and social services providers, clients, and partners to visit the website and complete a survey app (Chorus Innovations) at baseline (September 20, 2021-April 4, 2022) and a 4- to 6-week follow-up (October 22, 2021-May 17, 2022). LGBTQ+ adults were compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults in demographics, website use, depression, and anxiety. Sensitivity analyses were adjusted for nonresponse (inverse probability weighting). Regression analyses identified predictors for reduction (pretest-posttest) in depression (2-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-2]) and anxiety (2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale [GAD-2]). ResultsOf 315 adults who completed the baseline survey and 193 who completed the follow-up survey, 64 (20.3%) and 37 (19.2%), respectively, were LGBTQ+. At baseline, LGBTQ+ compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults had higher scores on the PHQ-2 (mean 2.4, SD 1.7 vs 1.3, SD 1.3; t294=5.31; P<.001) and GAD-2 (mean 2.7, SD 1.7 vs 1.6, SD 1.5; t295=4.96; P<.001) and more COVID-19 stressors (mean score 8.1, SD 4.4 vs 6.5, SD 4.0; t298=2.8; P=.003). Before follow-up, LGBTQ+ adults had similar website use (P=.65) and likelihood to recommend the website to others (P=.26) compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults. LGBTQ+ adults had more reduction (pretest-posttest) in mean GAD-2 scores (−0.8, SD 2.0 vs 0.0, SD 1.2; t177=−3.08; P=.002) and mean PHQ-2 scores (−0.7, SD 1.7 vs −0.1, SD 1.4; t180=−2.16; P=.03) compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults. For LGBTQ+ adults, predictors of pretest-posttest decline (adjusting for nonresponse) in mean GAD-2 scores included visiting the website and using resources 4 to 6 weeks before (β=−1.95, 95% CI −3.20 to −0.70; P=.003); for decline in mean PHQ-2, visiting website/using resources had a trend as predictor that was not significant adjusting for nonresponse (β=-.94 (-2.00, 0.013), P=.09). ConclusionsLGBTQ+ adults reported higher baseline depression, anxiety, and COVID-19 stressors than non-LGBTQ+ adults. Among LGBTQ+ but not among non-LGBTQ+ adults, higher website use was associated with reduced anxiety over time. Findings suggest that online resources may promote well-being for LGBTQ+ adults in pandemics.
format Article
id doaj-art-589daa3ef312418cb9a5fb490ee77db9
institution DOAJ
issn 2561-326X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Formative Research
spelling doaj-art-589daa3ef312418cb9a5fb490ee77db92025-08-20T03:17:47ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2025-07-019e6708210.2196/67082Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey AnalysesNatalia Ramoshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-9426Skylar Joneshttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-2162-9553Lily Zhanghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6251-6913Miriam Nuñohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2089-7276Benita Ramseyhttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-9762-5451Dannie Ceseñahttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-1215-9045Alyssa Mireleshttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-4957-3408Kenneth Wellshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-6589 BackgroundLesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) individuals faced greater mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic than binary-gender heterosexual (non-LGBTQ+) adults. The Together for Wellness/Juntos por Nuestro Bienestar website with free well-being resources, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic with partner input, included LGBTQ+ resources. A pilot evaluation among adults (aged ≥18 years) found engagement with and use of the website 4 to 6 weeks before follow-up was associated with reduced (pretest-posttest) depression. Results for LGBTQ+ participants were not reported. ObjectiveThis study describes baseline depression, anxiety, and website engagement for LGBTQ+ compared with non-LGBTQ+ adults and pretest-posttest changes in depression and anxiety (the primary outcome). MethodsCommunity partners invited health and social services providers, clients, and partners to visit the website and complete a survey app (Chorus Innovations) at baseline (September 20, 2021-April 4, 2022) and a 4- to 6-week follow-up (October 22, 2021-May 17, 2022). LGBTQ+ adults were compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults in demographics, website use, depression, and anxiety. Sensitivity analyses were adjusted for nonresponse (inverse probability weighting). Regression analyses identified predictors for reduction (pretest-posttest) in depression (2-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-2]) and anxiety (2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale [GAD-2]). ResultsOf 315 adults who completed the baseline survey and 193 who completed the follow-up survey, 64 (20.3%) and 37 (19.2%), respectively, were LGBTQ+. At baseline, LGBTQ+ compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults had higher scores on the PHQ-2 (mean 2.4, SD 1.7 vs 1.3, SD 1.3; t294=5.31; P<.001) and GAD-2 (mean 2.7, SD 1.7 vs 1.6, SD 1.5; t295=4.96; P<.001) and more COVID-19 stressors (mean score 8.1, SD 4.4 vs 6.5, SD 4.0; t298=2.8; P=.003). Before follow-up, LGBTQ+ adults had similar website use (P=.65) and likelihood to recommend the website to others (P=.26) compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults. LGBTQ+ adults had more reduction (pretest-posttest) in mean GAD-2 scores (−0.8, SD 2.0 vs 0.0, SD 1.2; t177=−3.08; P=.002) and mean PHQ-2 scores (−0.7, SD 1.7 vs −0.1, SD 1.4; t180=−2.16; P=.03) compared to non-LGBTQ+ adults. For LGBTQ+ adults, predictors of pretest-posttest decline (adjusting for nonresponse) in mean GAD-2 scores included visiting the website and using resources 4 to 6 weeks before (β=−1.95, 95% CI −3.20 to −0.70; P=.003); for decline in mean PHQ-2, visiting website/using resources had a trend as predictor that was not significant adjusting for nonresponse (β=-.94 (-2.00, 0.013), P=.09). ConclusionsLGBTQ+ adults reported higher baseline depression, anxiety, and COVID-19 stressors than non-LGBTQ+ adults. Among LGBTQ+ but not among non-LGBTQ+ adults, higher website use was associated with reduced anxiety over time. Findings suggest that online resources may promote well-being for LGBTQ+ adults in pandemics.https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e67082
spellingShingle Natalia Ramos
Skylar Jones
Lily Zhang
Miriam Nuño
Benita Ramsey
Dannie Ceseña
Alyssa Mireles
Kenneth Wells
Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses
JMIR Formative Research
title Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses
title_full Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses
title_fullStr Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses
title_short Exploring the Impact of Online Mental Health Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Adults Compared to Heterosexual Adults: Pretest-Posttest Survey Analyses
title_sort exploring the impact of online mental health resources during the covid 19 pandemic on lesbian gay bisexual transgender queer and questioning adults compared to heterosexual adults pretest posttest survey analyses
url https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e67082
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliaramos exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses
AT skylarjones exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses
AT lilyzhang exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses
AT miriamnuno exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses
AT benitaramsey exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses
AT danniecesena exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses
AT alyssamireles exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses
AT kennethwells exploringtheimpactofonlinementalhealthresourcesduringthecovid19pandemiconlesbiangaybisexualtransgenderqueerandquestioningadultscomparedtoheterosexualadultspretestposttestsurveyanalyses