Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soil

Abstract The negative sustainability impact of peat use in the horticultural sector has recently come into political focus. A bottom-up approach would be to convince consumers to buy peat alternatives. This is where this study comes in. We examined the reactions of consumers (n = 1113) to differentl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mira Lehberger, Anne-Katrin Kleih, Kai Sparke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-05-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00358-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849325952704708608
author Mira Lehberger
Anne-Katrin Kleih
Kai Sparke
author_facet Mira Lehberger
Anne-Katrin Kleih
Kai Sparke
author_sort Mira Lehberger
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The negative sustainability impact of peat use in the horticultural sector has recently come into political focus. A bottom-up approach would be to convince consumers to buy peat alternatives. This is where this study comes in. We examined the reactions of consumers (n = 1113) to differently framed potting soil messages. By including a no-intervention benchmark, we identify the magnitude of change in purchase intention resulting from framing interventions. We also apply measures to mitigate experimenter demand effect and social desirability bias. We find that in the absence of information, consumers prefer peat-based to peat-free potting soil. However, purchase intentions can be easily influenced in a more pro-environmental direction by providing additional information on soil type and framing messages on the environmental consequences of different soil types (peat-free vs. peat-based). We find evidence that higher levels of subjective knowledge are associated with lower intentions to buy peat-free potting soil, while higher levels of objective knowledge are associated with higher intentions. Our results highlight the importance of providing the right kind of information to encourage climate-friendly consumption, but also the relevance of consumer knowledge. We provide measures that different actors in the value chain can adapt to increase climate-friendly consumption.
format Article
id doaj-art-58816019c70c4ebe9253f047bff79559
institution Kabale University
issn 2193-7532
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Agricultural and Food Economics
spelling doaj-art-58816019c70c4ebe9253f047bff795592025-08-20T03:48:15ZengSpringerOpenAgricultural and Food Economics2193-75322025-05-0113111910.1186/s40100-025-00358-6Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soilMira Lehberger0Anne-Katrin Kleih1Kai Sparke2Department of Fresh Produce Logistics, Professorship of Horticultural Economics, Hochschule Geisenheim UniversityDepartment of Fresh Produce Logistics, Professorship of Horticultural Economics, Hochschule Geisenheim UniversityDepartment of Fresh Produce Logistics, Professorship of Horticultural Economics, Hochschule Geisenheim UniversityAbstract The negative sustainability impact of peat use in the horticultural sector has recently come into political focus. A bottom-up approach would be to convince consumers to buy peat alternatives. This is where this study comes in. We examined the reactions of consumers (n = 1113) to differently framed potting soil messages. By including a no-intervention benchmark, we identify the magnitude of change in purchase intention resulting from framing interventions. We also apply measures to mitigate experimenter demand effect and social desirability bias. We find that in the absence of information, consumers prefer peat-based to peat-free potting soil. However, purchase intentions can be easily influenced in a more pro-environmental direction by providing additional information on soil type and framing messages on the environmental consequences of different soil types (peat-free vs. peat-based). We find evidence that higher levels of subjective knowledge are associated with lower intentions to buy peat-free potting soil, while higher levels of objective knowledge are associated with higher intentions. Our results highlight the importance of providing the right kind of information to encourage climate-friendly consumption, but also the relevance of consumer knowledge. We provide measures that different actors in the value chain can adapt to increase climate-friendly consumption.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00358-6Gain- and loss-framed messagesConsumer knowledgePeatHome gardenersPro-environmental behaviorLow-involvement products
spellingShingle Mira Lehberger
Anne-Katrin Kleih
Kai Sparke
Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soil
Agricultural and Food Economics
Gain- and loss-framed messages
Consumer knowledge
Peat
Home gardeners
Pro-environmental behavior
Low-involvement products
title Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soil
title_full Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soil
title_fullStr Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soil
title_full_unstemmed Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soil
title_short Effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate-friendly products—an experimental study on peat-free vs. peat-based potting soil
title_sort effects of framing and knowledge on purchase intention of climate friendly products an experimental study on peat free vs peat based potting soil
topic Gain- and loss-framed messages
Consumer knowledge
Peat
Home gardeners
Pro-environmental behavior
Low-involvement products
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00358-6
work_keys_str_mv AT miralehberger effectsofframingandknowledgeonpurchaseintentionofclimatefriendlyproductsanexperimentalstudyonpeatfreevspeatbasedpottingsoil
AT annekatrinkleih effectsofframingandknowledgeonpurchaseintentionofclimatefriendlyproductsanexperimentalstudyonpeatfreevspeatbasedpottingsoil
AT kaisparke effectsofframingandknowledgeonpurchaseintentionofclimatefriendlyproductsanexperimentalstudyonpeatfreevspeatbasedpottingsoil