Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) prevalence is predicted to rise dramatically in the upcoming years. Although several medications have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in recent years, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) still struggle to access these medications due to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marzieh Nosrati, Shadi Izadidehkordi, Shekoufeh Nikfar, Fatemeh Sadat Heydari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2025-08-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijms.sums.ac.ir/article_51078_3ed130f6ad6d84cd2a423316653e315f.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225325937950720
author Marzieh Nosrati
Shadi Izadidehkordi
Shekoufeh Nikfar
Fatemeh Sadat Heydari
author_facet Marzieh Nosrati
Shadi Izadidehkordi
Shekoufeh Nikfar
Fatemeh Sadat Heydari
author_sort Marzieh Nosrati
collection DOAJ
description Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) prevalence is predicted to rise dramatically in the upcoming years. Although several medications have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in recent years, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) still struggle to access these medications due to their remarkably high prices. Crizanlizumab, owing to its clinical and economic privileges, appears to be the most suitable option for addition to pharmacotherapy guidelines. However, no study has yet investigated its cost-effectiveness in Iran’s healthcare system. Methods: This cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted in 2022 at the Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmaceutical Administration Department of the Faculty of Pharmacy at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. A decision-tree model was designed, followed by a cost-utility analysis for crizanlizumab in two separate scenarios, targeting not only monotherapy with crizanlizumab in SCD compared with placebo, but also crizanlizumab’s concomitant use with hydroxyurea compared with hydroxyurea. The study reports the outcomes from Iran’s healthcare system perspective. Direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life years related to vaso-occlusive crisis, hospitalizations, and adverse effects were calculated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared. SUSTAIN trial was the main clinical source for modeling crizanlizumab’s effectiveness in SCD. A sensitivity analysis was performed to measure the sensitivity of outcomes to changes in medication costs. Microsoft Excel 2020 was utilized for calculations and modeling. Results: Concomitant therapy with low-dose crizanlizumab added to hydroxyurea led to the lowest Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 398,881 United States dollars (USD), exceeding Iran’s accepted cost-effectiveness threshold. Sensitivity analysis results demonstrate that even a 20% reduction in the price of crizanlizumab does not lead to its cost-effectiveness in Iran.Conclusion: Crizanlizumab administration in sickle cell disease is not found cost-effective in Iran, neither as a monotherapy nor added to hydroxyurea.
format Article
id doaj-art-58695fb75238417ca33468e2b0e13ed3
institution Kabale University
issn 0253-0716
1735-3688
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-58695fb75238417ca33468e2b0e13ed32025-08-25T03:45:16ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Medical Sciences0253-07161735-36882025-08-0150854855510.30476/ijms.2025.102567.357351078Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in IranMarzieh Nosrati0Shadi Izadidehkordi1Shekoufeh Nikfar2Fatemeh Sadat Heydari3Personalized Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranPersonalized Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranBackground: Sickle cell disease (SCD) prevalence is predicted to rise dramatically in the upcoming years. Although several medications have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in recent years, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) still struggle to access these medications due to their remarkably high prices. Crizanlizumab, owing to its clinical and economic privileges, appears to be the most suitable option for addition to pharmacotherapy guidelines. However, no study has yet investigated its cost-effectiveness in Iran’s healthcare system. Methods: This cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted in 2022 at the Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmaceutical Administration Department of the Faculty of Pharmacy at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. A decision-tree model was designed, followed by a cost-utility analysis for crizanlizumab in two separate scenarios, targeting not only monotherapy with crizanlizumab in SCD compared with placebo, but also crizanlizumab’s concomitant use with hydroxyurea compared with hydroxyurea. The study reports the outcomes from Iran’s healthcare system perspective. Direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life years related to vaso-occlusive crisis, hospitalizations, and adverse effects were calculated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared. SUSTAIN trial was the main clinical source for modeling crizanlizumab’s effectiveness in SCD. A sensitivity analysis was performed to measure the sensitivity of outcomes to changes in medication costs. Microsoft Excel 2020 was utilized for calculations and modeling. Results: Concomitant therapy with low-dose crizanlizumab added to hydroxyurea led to the lowest Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 398,881 United States dollars (USD), exceeding Iran’s accepted cost-effectiveness threshold. Sensitivity analysis results demonstrate that even a 20% reduction in the price of crizanlizumab does not lead to its cost-effectiveness in Iran.Conclusion: Crizanlizumab administration in sickle cell disease is not found cost-effective in Iran, neither as a monotherapy nor added to hydroxyurea.https://ijms.sums.ac.ir/article_51078_3ed130f6ad6d84cd2a423316653e315f.pdfcost-effectiveness analysiscrizanlizumabsickle cell diseasesickle cell anemiaadakveo
spellingShingle Marzieh Nosrati
Shadi Izadidehkordi
Shekoufeh Nikfar
Fatemeh Sadat Heydari
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
cost-effectiveness analysis
crizanlizumab
sickle cell disease
sickle cell anemia
adakveo
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease in Iran
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of crizanlizumab in sickle cell disease in iran
topic cost-effectiveness analysis
crizanlizumab
sickle cell disease
sickle cell anemia
adakveo
url https://ijms.sums.ac.ir/article_51078_3ed130f6ad6d84cd2a423316653e315f.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marziehnosrati costeffectivenessanalysisofcrizanlizumabinsicklecelldiseaseiniran
AT shadiizadidehkordi costeffectivenessanalysisofcrizanlizumabinsicklecelldiseaseiniran
AT shekoufehnikfar costeffectivenessanalysisofcrizanlizumabinsicklecelldiseaseiniran
AT fatemehsadatheydari costeffectivenessanalysisofcrizanlizumabinsicklecelldiseaseiniran