Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencing

Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) numbers have declined steeply in recent decades due to the fin fishery and bycatch in pelagic fisheries. Due to a lack of data on stock delineations, this species is currently managed in ocean-spanning jurisdictions defined by regional fisheries...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derek W. Kraft, Emily E. Conklin, Evan B. Freel, Melanie Hutchinson, Julia L.Y. Spaet, Robert J. Toonen, Zac H. Forsman, Michael I. Grant, John David Filmalter, John R. Hyde, Simon J.B. Gulak, Brian W. Bowen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2025-07-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/19493.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849320391585038336
author Derek W. Kraft
Emily E. Conklin
Evan B. Freel
Melanie Hutchinson
Julia L.Y. Spaet
Robert J. Toonen
Zac H. Forsman
Michael I. Grant
John David Filmalter
John R. Hyde
Simon J.B. Gulak
Brian W. Bowen
author_facet Derek W. Kraft
Emily E. Conklin
Evan B. Freel
Melanie Hutchinson
Julia L.Y. Spaet
Robert J. Toonen
Zac H. Forsman
Michael I. Grant
John David Filmalter
John R. Hyde
Simon J.B. Gulak
Brian W. Bowen
author_sort Derek W. Kraft
collection DOAJ
description Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) numbers have declined steeply in recent decades due to the fin fishery and bycatch in pelagic fisheries. Due to a lack of data on stock delineations, this species is currently managed in ocean-spanning jurisdictions defined by regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs). Here we investigate the global stock structure of silky sharks and compare population structure to the four RFMO boundaries. Using high-throughput sequencing from pooled individuals (pool-seq) based on 628 specimens collected opportunistically across 11 circumglobal regions, yielding 854 nuclear single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 23 mtDNA SNPs. Results indicate significant population genetic structure between all 11 regional sampling locations, with discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) identifying seven discrete groups. Within the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific Oceans, FST values ranged from 0.014 to 0.035 for nuclear (nDNA) markers, and from 0.012 to 0.160 for whole mtDNA genomes, with much higher values between than within oceans (mtDNA: 0.383–0.844, nDNA: 0.042–0.078). Using an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) framework, 22.24% of the observed population variance is explained by RFMOs, 32.1% is explained among ocean basins, and 34.81% is explained by the DAPC-identified groups. We find significant population genetic structure within the jurisdiction of every RFMO, from which we have more than a single sampling site. Our genomic-scale results indicate discordance between population genetic structure and RFMOs, highlighting the need for a detailed study to accurately identify stock boundaries.
format Article
id doaj-art-583fbf3bc0f449d1901c677b77a04385
institution Kabale University
issn 2167-8359
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj-art-583fbf3bc0f449d1901c677b77a043852025-08-20T03:50:06ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592025-07-0113e1949310.7717/peerj.19493Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencingDerek W. Kraft0Emily E. Conklin1Evan B. Freel2Melanie Hutchinson3Julia L.Y. Spaet4Robert J. Toonen5Zac H. Forsman6Michael I. Grant7John David Filmalter8John R. Hyde9Simon J.B. Gulak10Brian W. Bowen11University of Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, Kãne‘ohe, Hawaiʻi, USAUniversity of Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, Kãne‘ohe, Hawaiʻi, USAUniversity of Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, Kãne‘ohe, Hawaiʻi, USAUniversity of Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, Kãne‘ohe, Hawaiʻi, USADepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Evolutionary Ecology Group, Cambridge, United KingdomUniversity of Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, Kãne‘ohe, Hawaiʻi, USAUniversity of Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, Kãne‘ohe, Hawaiʻi, USAJames Cook University, Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and Engineering, Townsville, Queensland, AustraliaSouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South AfricaNational Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, CA, USARiverside Technology, Inc. for NOAA Fisheries, Fort Collins, CO, United States of AmericaUniversity of Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology, Kãne‘ohe, Hawaiʻi, USASilky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) numbers have declined steeply in recent decades due to the fin fishery and bycatch in pelagic fisheries. Due to a lack of data on stock delineations, this species is currently managed in ocean-spanning jurisdictions defined by regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs). Here we investigate the global stock structure of silky sharks and compare population structure to the four RFMO boundaries. Using high-throughput sequencing from pooled individuals (pool-seq) based on 628 specimens collected opportunistically across 11 circumglobal regions, yielding 854 nuclear single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 23 mtDNA SNPs. Results indicate significant population genetic structure between all 11 regional sampling locations, with discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) identifying seven discrete groups. Within the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific Oceans, FST values ranged from 0.014 to 0.035 for nuclear (nDNA) markers, and from 0.012 to 0.160 for whole mtDNA genomes, with much higher values between than within oceans (mtDNA: 0.383–0.844, nDNA: 0.042–0.078). Using an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) framework, 22.24% of the observed population variance is explained by RFMOs, 32.1% is explained among ocean basins, and 34.81% is explained by the DAPC-identified groups. We find significant population genetic structure within the jurisdiction of every RFMO, from which we have more than a single sampling site. Our genomic-scale results indicate discordance between population genetic structure and RFMOs, highlighting the need for a detailed study to accurately identify stock boundaries.https://peerj.com/articles/19493.pdfMarine fisheriesElasmobranchMarine fishesPhylogeographyPool-seqStock structure
spellingShingle Derek W. Kraft
Emily E. Conklin
Evan B. Freel
Melanie Hutchinson
Julia L.Y. Spaet
Robert J. Toonen
Zac H. Forsman
Michael I. Grant
John David Filmalter
John R. Hyde
Simon J.B. Gulak
Brian W. Bowen
Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencing
PeerJ
Marine fisheries
Elasmobranch
Marine fishes
Phylogeography
Pool-seq
Stock structure
title Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencing
title_full Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencing
title_fullStr Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencing
title_short Global stock structure of the Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinidae) assessed with high-throughput DNA sequencing
title_sort global stock structure of the silky shark carcharhinus falciformis carcharhinidae assessed with high throughput dna sequencing
topic Marine fisheries
Elasmobranch
Marine fishes
Phylogeography
Pool-seq
Stock structure
url https://peerj.com/articles/19493.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT derekwkraft globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT emilyeconklin globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT evanbfreel globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT melaniehutchinson globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT julialyspaet globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT robertjtoonen globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT zachforsman globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT michaeligrant globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT johndavidfilmalter globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT johnrhyde globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT simonjbgulak globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing
AT brianwbowen globalstockstructureofthesilkysharkcarcharhinusfalciformiscarcharhinidaeassessedwithhighthroughputdnasequencing