Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke

Background. Severity of arm impairment alone does not explain motor outcomes in people with severe impairment post stroke. Objective. Define the contribution of brain biomarkers to upper limb motor outcomes in people with severe arm impairment post stroke. Methods. Paretic arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathryn S. Hayward, Jason L. Neva, Cameron S. Mang, Sue Peters, Katie P. Wadden, Jennifer K. Ferris, Lara A. Boyd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4281532
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545848509071360
author Kathryn S. Hayward
Jason L. Neva
Cameron S. Mang
Sue Peters
Katie P. Wadden
Jennifer K. Ferris
Lara A. Boyd
author_facet Kathryn S. Hayward
Jason L. Neva
Cameron S. Mang
Sue Peters
Katie P. Wadden
Jennifer K. Ferris
Lara A. Boyd
author_sort Kathryn S. Hayward
collection DOAJ
description Background. Severity of arm impairment alone does not explain motor outcomes in people with severe impairment post stroke. Objective. Define the contribution of brain biomarkers to upper limb motor outcomes in people with severe arm impairment post stroke. Methods. Paretic arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer upper limb, FM-UL) and function (Wolf Motor Function Test rate, WMFT-rate) were measured in 15 individuals with severe (FM-UL ≤ 30/66) and 14 with mild–moderate (FM-UL > 40/66) impairment. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion weight imaging indexed structure and function of the corticospinal tract and corpus callosum. Separate models of the relationship between possible biomarkers and motor outcomes at a single chronic (≥6 months) time point post stroke were performed. Results. Age (ΔR20.365, p=0.017) and ipsilesional-transcallosal inhibition (ΔR20.182, p=0.048) explained a 54.7% (p=0.009) variance in paretic WMFT-rate. Prefrontal corpus callous fractional anisotropy (PF-CC FA) alone explained 49.3% (p=0.007) variance in FM-UL outcome. The same models did not explain significant variance in mild–moderate stroke. In the severe group, k-means cluster analysis of PF-CC FA distinguished two subgroups, separated by a clinically meaningful and significant difference in motor impairment (p=0.049) and function (p=0.006) outcomes. Conclusion. Corpus callosum function and structure were identified as possible biomarkers of motor outcome in people with chronic and severe arm impairment.
format Article
id doaj-art-581711819b0e44d1b11005de4ed7c251
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-581711819b0e44d1b11005de4ed7c2512025-02-03T07:24:32ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432017-01-01201710.1155/2017/42815324281532Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post StrokeKathryn S. Hayward0Jason L. Neva1Cameron S. Mang2Sue Peters3Katie P. Wadden4Jennifer K. Ferris5Lara A. Boyd6Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaBackground. Severity of arm impairment alone does not explain motor outcomes in people with severe impairment post stroke. Objective. Define the contribution of brain biomarkers to upper limb motor outcomes in people with severe arm impairment post stroke. Methods. Paretic arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer upper limb, FM-UL) and function (Wolf Motor Function Test rate, WMFT-rate) were measured in 15 individuals with severe (FM-UL ≤ 30/66) and 14 with mild–moderate (FM-UL > 40/66) impairment. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion weight imaging indexed structure and function of the corticospinal tract and corpus callosum. Separate models of the relationship between possible biomarkers and motor outcomes at a single chronic (≥6 months) time point post stroke were performed. Results. Age (ΔR20.365, p=0.017) and ipsilesional-transcallosal inhibition (ΔR20.182, p=0.048) explained a 54.7% (p=0.009) variance in paretic WMFT-rate. Prefrontal corpus callous fractional anisotropy (PF-CC FA) alone explained 49.3% (p=0.007) variance in FM-UL outcome. The same models did not explain significant variance in mild–moderate stroke. In the severe group, k-means cluster analysis of PF-CC FA distinguished two subgroups, separated by a clinically meaningful and significant difference in motor impairment (p=0.049) and function (p=0.006) outcomes. Conclusion. Corpus callosum function and structure were identified as possible biomarkers of motor outcome in people with chronic and severe arm impairment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4281532
spellingShingle Kathryn S. Hayward
Jason L. Neva
Cameron S. Mang
Sue Peters
Katie P. Wadden
Jennifer K. Ferris
Lara A. Boyd
Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke
Neural Plasticity
title Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke
title_full Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke
title_fullStr Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke
title_short Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke
title_sort interhemispheric pathways are important for motor outcome in individuals with chronic and severe upper limb impairment post stroke
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4281532
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrynshayward interhemisphericpathwaysareimportantformotoroutcomeinindividualswithchronicandsevereupperlimbimpairmentpoststroke
AT jasonlneva interhemisphericpathwaysareimportantformotoroutcomeinindividualswithchronicandsevereupperlimbimpairmentpoststroke
AT cameronsmang interhemisphericpathwaysareimportantformotoroutcomeinindividualswithchronicandsevereupperlimbimpairmentpoststroke
AT suepeters interhemisphericpathwaysareimportantformotoroutcomeinindividualswithchronicandsevereupperlimbimpairmentpoststroke
AT katiepwadden interhemisphericpathwaysareimportantformotoroutcomeinindividualswithchronicandsevereupperlimbimpairmentpoststroke
AT jenniferkferris interhemisphericpathwaysareimportantformotoroutcomeinindividualswithchronicandsevereupperlimbimpairmentpoststroke
AT laraaboyd interhemisphericpathwaysareimportantformotoroutcomeinindividualswithchronicandsevereupperlimbimpairmentpoststroke