M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in Cinematography

Based on previously unknown materials from the Archive of A.M. Gorky and RGALI, the article reveals the history and consequences of the meeting of writers, cinematographers, and composers held on April 10, 1935. With the spread of sound cinema, the verbal part of the cinematographic action began to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anastasia G. Plotnikova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature 2024-12-01
Series:Studia Litterarum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://studlit.ru/images/2024-9-4/16_Plotnikova.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850252982816342016
author Anastasia G. Plotnikova
author_facet Anastasia G. Plotnikova
author_sort Anastasia G. Plotnikova
collection DOAJ
description Based on previously unknown materials from the Archive of A.M. Gorky and RGALI, the article reveals the history and consequences of the meeting of writers, cinematographers, and composers held on April 10, 1935. With the spread of sound cinema, the verbal part of the cinematographic action began to play a more significant role, which aggravated the issue of “scenario hunger” and the participation of writers in the film process. A significant stage in this discussion was a meeting of artists in the Moscow House of Writers chaired by M. Gorky. The meeting was extremely controversial, and Gorky’s statements were then published in Pravda with the addition of some fragments that aggravated the confrontation. In response, the head of Soviet cinematography B.Z. Shumyatsky sent his article “On the Responsibility of Estimates” to the newspaper, sharply criticizing Gorky. An analysis of the circumstances and consequences of the 1935 conflict suggests that during this period, the struggle between the Union of Soviet Writers and the State Directorate of the Film and Photo Industry intensified not only in aesthetic, methodological, and production aspects but also in matters of ideological and political influence and the distribution of economic resources.
format Article
id doaj-art-5811cfde11994e3ebe8023cba31c3e83
institution OA Journals
issn 2500-4247
2541-8564
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
record_format Article
series Studia Litterarum
spelling doaj-art-5811cfde11994e3ebe8023cba31c3e832025-08-20T01:57:29ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World LiteratureStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642024-12-019430232110.22455/2500-4247-2024-9-4-302-321M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in CinematographyAnastasia G. Plotnikova0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-0608А.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, RussiaBased on previously unknown materials from the Archive of A.M. Gorky and RGALI, the article reveals the history and consequences of the meeting of writers, cinematographers, and composers held on April 10, 1935. With the spread of sound cinema, the verbal part of the cinematographic action began to play a more significant role, which aggravated the issue of “scenario hunger” and the participation of writers in the film process. A significant stage in this discussion was a meeting of artists in the Moscow House of Writers chaired by M. Gorky. The meeting was extremely controversial, and Gorky’s statements were then published in Pravda with the addition of some fragments that aggravated the confrontation. In response, the head of Soviet cinematography B.Z. Shumyatsky sent his article “On the Responsibility of Estimates” to the newspaper, sharply criticizing Gorky. An analysis of the circumstances and consequences of the 1935 conflict suggests that during this period, the struggle between the Union of Soviet Writers and the State Directorate of the Film and Photo Industry intensified not only in aesthetic, methodological, and production aspects but also in matters of ideological and political influence and the distribution of economic resources.https://studlit.ru/images/2024-9-4/16_Plotnikova.pdfm. gorkyb.z. shumyatskyunion of soviet writersf.m. ermlerg.v. alexandrova.p. dovzhenkov.i. pudovkindiscussion about the writercinematographyliteraturecinema
spellingShingle Anastasia G. Plotnikova
M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in Cinematography
Studia Litterarum
m. gorky
b.z. shumyatsky
union of soviet writers
f.m. ermler
g.v. alexandrov
a.p. dovzhenko
v.i. pudovkin
discussion about the writer
cinematography
literature
cinema
title M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in Cinematography
title_full M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in Cinematography
title_fullStr M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in Cinematography
title_full_unstemmed M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in Cinematography
title_short M. Gorky and the 1935 Discussion About the Writer in Cinematography
title_sort m gorky and the 1935 discussion about the writer in cinematography
topic m. gorky
b.z. shumyatsky
union of soviet writers
f.m. ermler
g.v. alexandrov
a.p. dovzhenko
v.i. pudovkin
discussion about the writer
cinematography
literature
cinema
url https://studlit.ru/images/2024-9-4/16_Plotnikova.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anastasiagplotnikova mgorkyandthe1935discussionaboutthewriterincinematography