Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index

Introduction: Insulin resistance (IR) is a complex pathophysiological condition with multifactorial etiology characterized by a reduced responsiveness of target tissues to insulin (INS). Indirect indices based on mathematical models and derived from laboratory parameters have become increasingly po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lejla Čano Dedić, Arzija Pašalić, Emsel Papić, Emir Begagić, Sabina Šečić Selimović, Mario Gazibarić, Sabina Šegalo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Sarajevo 2024-09-01
Series:Journal of Health Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/2673
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542579031277568
author Lejla Čano Dedić
Arzija Pašalić
Emsel Papić
Emir Begagić
Sabina Šečić Selimović
Mario Gazibarić
Sabina Šegalo
author_facet Lejla Čano Dedić
Arzija Pašalić
Emsel Papić
Emir Begagić
Sabina Šečić Selimović
Mario Gazibarić
Sabina Šegalo
author_sort Lejla Čano Dedić
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Insulin resistance (IR) is a complex pathophysiological condition with multifactorial etiology characterized by a reduced responsiveness of target tissues to insulin (INS). Indirect indices based on mathematical models and derived from laboratory parameters have become increasingly popular in the past two decades. In this study, we evaluated their ability to predict IR in a population with different body mass index (BMI). Methods: The matched case–control study was conducted in 2021 and 2022. Secondary data from 129 subjects were obtained from medical records, including demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and biochemical laboratory test results. The studied group consisted of 91 subjects with a suspected diagnosis of IR who were further categorized according to BMI, while control group consisted from 38 age- and gender-matched subjects. Six widely used indirect indices were calculated: Homeostatic Model Assessment for IR (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), McAuley index (MCAi), metabolic score for IR (METS-IR), triglyceride to glucose index (TyG), and TyG to BMI (TyG-BMI). Results: Significant differences between the subgroups were found in the mean values for HOMA-IR, TyG, TyG-BMI, and METS- IR, while the control group had the highest mean values for the indirect indices QUICKI and MCAi (p < 0.001). HOMA-IR, TyG, and TyG-BMI showed statistical significance in predicting IR regardless of BMI (p < 0.05). In the obese group, TyG-BMI had good predictive power for discriminating IR (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.820), with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.1% and 87.7%, respectively. HOMA-IR showed moderate predictive power to discriminate IR in the obese group (AUC = 0.720), with a sensitivity and specificity of 70.4% and 89.1%, respectively. Conclusion: As IR is a multifactorial disease, indirect indices combining laboratory and anthropometric data can significantly help in predicting and mitigating complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-580ed97c25a9410c9ad2229e65795c97
institution Kabale University
issn 2232-7576
1986-8049
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher University of Sarajevo
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Sciences
spelling doaj-art-580ed97c25a9410c9ad2229e65795c972025-02-03T23:18:08ZengUniversity of SarajevoJournal of Health Sciences2232-75761986-80492024-09-0114210.17532/jhsci.2024.2673Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass indexLejla Čano Dedić0Arzija Pašalić1Emsel Papić2Emir Begagić3Sabina Šečić Selimović 4Mario Gazibarić5Sabina Šegalo6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-3278Department of Medical-Biochemical Diagnostics, Polyclinic Atrijum, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Department of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Nutrition and Health Dietetics, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of General Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Nutrition and Health Dietetics, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDepartment of Laboratory Technologies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Introduction: Insulin resistance (IR) is a complex pathophysiological condition with multifactorial etiology characterized by a reduced responsiveness of target tissues to insulin (INS). Indirect indices based on mathematical models and derived from laboratory parameters have become increasingly popular in the past two decades. In this study, we evaluated their ability to predict IR in a population with different body mass index (BMI). Methods: The matched case–control study was conducted in 2021 and 2022. Secondary data from 129 subjects were obtained from medical records, including demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and biochemical laboratory test results. The studied group consisted of 91 subjects with a suspected diagnosis of IR who were further categorized according to BMI, while control group consisted from 38 age- and gender-matched subjects. Six widely used indirect indices were calculated: Homeostatic Model Assessment for IR (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), McAuley index (MCAi), metabolic score for IR (METS-IR), triglyceride to glucose index (TyG), and TyG to BMI (TyG-BMI). Results: Significant differences between the subgroups were found in the mean values for HOMA-IR, TyG, TyG-BMI, and METS- IR, while the control group had the highest mean values for the indirect indices QUICKI and MCAi (p < 0.001). HOMA-IR, TyG, and TyG-BMI showed statistical significance in predicting IR regardless of BMI (p < 0.05). In the obese group, TyG-BMI had good predictive power for discriminating IR (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.820), with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.1% and 87.7%, respectively. HOMA-IR showed moderate predictive power to discriminate IR in the obese group (AUC = 0.720), with a sensitivity and specificity of 70.4% and 89.1%, respectively. Conclusion: As IR is a multifactorial disease, indirect indices combining laboratory and anthropometric data can significantly help in predicting and mitigating complications. http://jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/2673Insulin resistancehomeostatic model assessment for insulin resistancetriglyceride to glucose indextriglyceride to glucose index-body mass index
spellingShingle Lejla Čano Dedić
Arzija Pašalić
Emsel Papić
Emir Begagić
Sabina Šečić Selimović
Mario Gazibarić
Sabina Šegalo
Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index
Journal of Health Sciences
Insulin resistance
homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance
triglyceride to glucose index
triglyceride to glucose index-body mass index
title Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index
title_full Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index
title_fullStr Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index
title_short Evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index
title_sort evaluation of indirect indices in the insulin resistance assessment in patients with different body mass index
topic Insulin resistance
homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance
triglyceride to glucose index
triglyceride to glucose index-body mass index
url http://jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/2673
work_keys_str_mv AT lejlacanodedic evaluationofindirectindicesintheinsulinresistanceassessmentinpatientswithdifferentbodymassindex
AT arzijapasalic evaluationofindirectindicesintheinsulinresistanceassessmentinpatientswithdifferentbodymassindex
AT emselpapic evaluationofindirectindicesintheinsulinresistanceassessmentinpatientswithdifferentbodymassindex
AT emirbegagic evaluationofindirectindicesintheinsulinresistanceassessmentinpatientswithdifferentbodymassindex
AT sabinasecicselimovic evaluationofindirectindicesintheinsulinresistanceassessmentinpatientswithdifferentbodymassindex
AT mariogazibaric evaluationofindirectindicesintheinsulinresistanceassessmentinpatientswithdifferentbodymassindex
AT sabinasegalo evaluationofindirectindicesintheinsulinresistanceassessmentinpatientswithdifferentbodymassindex