The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial

BackgroundEpitranscriptomics, with m6A as the most prevalent in mammals, is a novel treatment target for inflammatory diseases, including cardiovascular diseases. However, little is known about m6A RNA-regulation during myocardial infarction (MI).MethodsIn this explorative sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tuva B. Dahl, Ana Quiles-Jiménez, Kaspar Broch, Anne Kristine Anstensrud, Lars Gullestad, Geir Ø. Andersen, Ola Kleveland, Jonas Øgaard, Vigdis Bjerkeli, Azita Rashidi, Kuan Yang, Kirsten B. Holven, Pål Aukrust, Magnar Bjørås, Camilla Huse, Bente Halvorsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532325/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849472190162927616
author Tuva B. Dahl
Tuva B. Dahl
Ana Quiles-Jiménez
Kaspar Broch
Kaspar Broch
Anne Kristine Anstensrud
Anne Kristine Anstensrud
Lars Gullestad
Lars Gullestad
Lars Gullestad
Geir Ø. Andersen
Geir Ø. Andersen
Ola Kleveland
Jonas Øgaard
Jonas Øgaard
Vigdis Bjerkeli
Vigdis Bjerkeli
Azita Rashidi
Kuan Yang
Kirsten B. Holven
Kirsten B. Holven
Pål Aukrust
Magnar Bjørås
Magnar Bjørås
Camilla Huse
Camilla Huse
Camilla Huse
Bente Halvorsen
Bente Halvorsen
author_facet Tuva B. Dahl
Tuva B. Dahl
Ana Quiles-Jiménez
Kaspar Broch
Kaspar Broch
Anne Kristine Anstensrud
Anne Kristine Anstensrud
Lars Gullestad
Lars Gullestad
Lars Gullestad
Geir Ø. Andersen
Geir Ø. Andersen
Ola Kleveland
Jonas Øgaard
Jonas Øgaard
Vigdis Bjerkeli
Vigdis Bjerkeli
Azita Rashidi
Kuan Yang
Kirsten B. Holven
Kirsten B. Holven
Pål Aukrust
Magnar Bjørås
Magnar Bjørås
Camilla Huse
Camilla Huse
Camilla Huse
Bente Halvorsen
Bente Halvorsen
author_sort Tuva B. Dahl
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundEpitranscriptomics, with m6A as the most prevalent in mammals, is a novel treatment target for inflammatory diseases, including cardiovascular diseases. However, little is known about m6A RNA-regulation during myocardial infarction (MI).MethodsIn this explorative sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial, we used whole blood samples from patients with acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI) (n=6) at admission and after 3–7 days, and from healthy control subjects (n=3). RNA was isolated, and m6A sites were analyzed using human m6A single nucleotide resolution microarray analysis. mRNA levels were analyzed using RNA sequencing analysis.ResultsCompared with controls, patients with STEMI had a strikingly different pattern of m6A deposition. In total, 845 m6A methylation sites in whole blood RNA were hypomethylated and 36 were hypermethylated compared with controls. Of the hypomethylated transcripts, 194 transcripts were lower expressed, while 197 transcripts were higher expressed. The m6A pattern changed from an overall hypomethylation at admission to an overall hypermethylation 3–7 day after admission. Anti-inflammatory treatment with tocilizumab further altered the m6A deposition.ConclusionsIn this hypothesis generating study, m6A deposition differs STEMI patients and healthy controls. The m6A pattern changes over the course of 3–7 days. This response is, at least to some degree, is modulated by blocking the IL-6 receptor. Our data may suggest that this post-transcriptional regulation of RNA is involved in the immune response during STEMI, highlighting its potential as a target for therapy in MI.
format Article
id doaj-art-57ede231e5544e97b6c7b350baff392e
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-3224
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj-art-57ede231e5544e97b6c7b350baff392e2025-08-20T03:24:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242025-06-011610.3389/fimmu.2025.15323251532325The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trialTuva B. Dahl0Tuva B. Dahl1Ana Quiles-Jiménez2Kaspar Broch3Kaspar Broch4Anne Kristine Anstensrud5Anne Kristine Anstensrud6Lars Gullestad7Lars Gullestad8Lars Gullestad9Geir Ø. Andersen10Geir Ø. Andersen11Ola Kleveland12Jonas Øgaard13Jonas Øgaard14Vigdis Bjerkeli15Vigdis Bjerkeli16Azita Rashidi17Kuan Yang18Kirsten B. Holven19Kirsten B. Holven20Pål Aukrust21Magnar Bjørås22Magnar Bjørås23Camilla Huse24Camilla Huse25Camilla Huse26Bente Halvorsen27Bente Halvorsen28Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayK. G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre and Centre for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayK. G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre and Centre for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Cardiology, Center for Clinical Heart Research, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, NorwayClinic of Cardiology, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, NorwayResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayNorwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway0Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway1National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway2Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway3Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway4Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, NorwayK. G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre and Centre for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayBackgroundEpitranscriptomics, with m6A as the most prevalent in mammals, is a novel treatment target for inflammatory diseases, including cardiovascular diseases. However, little is known about m6A RNA-regulation during myocardial infarction (MI).MethodsIn this explorative sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial, we used whole blood samples from patients with acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI) (n=6) at admission and after 3–7 days, and from healthy control subjects (n=3). RNA was isolated, and m6A sites were analyzed using human m6A single nucleotide resolution microarray analysis. mRNA levels were analyzed using RNA sequencing analysis.ResultsCompared with controls, patients with STEMI had a strikingly different pattern of m6A deposition. In total, 845 m6A methylation sites in whole blood RNA were hypomethylated and 36 were hypermethylated compared with controls. Of the hypomethylated transcripts, 194 transcripts were lower expressed, while 197 transcripts were higher expressed. The m6A pattern changed from an overall hypomethylation at admission to an overall hypermethylation 3–7 day after admission. Anti-inflammatory treatment with tocilizumab further altered the m6A deposition.ConclusionsIn this hypothesis generating study, m6A deposition differs STEMI patients and healthy controls. The m6A pattern changes over the course of 3–7 days. This response is, at least to some degree, is modulated by blocking the IL-6 receptor. Our data may suggest that this post-transcriptional regulation of RNA is involved in the immune response during STEMI, highlighting its potential as a target for therapy in MI.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532325/fullN6-methyladenosine (m6A)epitranscriptomeRNA methylationSTEMIinflammationtocilizumab
spellingShingle Tuva B. Dahl
Tuva B. Dahl
Ana Quiles-Jiménez
Kaspar Broch
Kaspar Broch
Anne Kristine Anstensrud
Anne Kristine Anstensrud
Lars Gullestad
Lars Gullestad
Lars Gullestad
Geir Ø. Andersen
Geir Ø. Andersen
Ola Kleveland
Jonas Øgaard
Jonas Øgaard
Vigdis Bjerkeli
Vigdis Bjerkeli
Azita Rashidi
Kuan Yang
Kirsten B. Holven
Kirsten B. Holven
Pål Aukrust
Magnar Bjørås
Magnar Bjørås
Camilla Huse
Camilla Huse
Camilla Huse
Bente Halvorsen
Bente Halvorsen
The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial
Frontiers in Immunology
N6-methyladenosine (m6A)
epitranscriptome
RNA methylation
STEMI
inflammation
tocilizumab
title The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial
title_full The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial
title_fullStr The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial
title_full_unstemmed The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial
title_short The N-6 methyladenosine dynamics in STEMI and the effect of IL-6 inhibition - a hypothesis generating sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial
title_sort n 6 methyladenosine dynamics in stemi and the effect of il 6 inhibition a hypothesis generating sub study of the assail mi trial
topic N6-methyladenosine (m6A)
epitranscriptome
RNA methylation
STEMI
inflammation
tocilizumab
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532325/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tuvabdahl then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT tuvabdahl then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT anaquilesjimenez then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kasparbroch then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kasparbroch then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT annekristineanstensrud then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT annekristineanstensrud then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT larsgullestad then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT larsgullestad then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT larsgullestad then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT geirøandersen then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT geirøandersen then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT olakleveland then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT jonasøgaard then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT jonasøgaard then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT vigdisbjerkeli then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT vigdisbjerkeli then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT azitarashidi then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kuanyang then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kirstenbholven then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kirstenbholven then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT palaukrust then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT magnarbjøras then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT magnarbjøras then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT camillahuse then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT camillahuse then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT camillahuse then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT bentehalvorsen then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT bentehalvorsen then6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT tuvabdahl n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT tuvabdahl n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT anaquilesjimenez n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kasparbroch n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kasparbroch n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT annekristineanstensrud n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT annekristineanstensrud n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT larsgullestad n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT larsgullestad n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT larsgullestad n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT geirøandersen n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT geirøandersen n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT olakleveland n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT jonasøgaard n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT jonasøgaard n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT vigdisbjerkeli n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT vigdisbjerkeli n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT azitarashidi n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kuanyang n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kirstenbholven n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT kirstenbholven n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT palaukrust n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT magnarbjøras n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT magnarbjøras n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT camillahuse n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT camillahuse n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT camillahuse n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT bentehalvorsen n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial
AT bentehalvorsen n6methyladenosinedynamicsinstemiandtheeffectofil6inhibitionahypothesisgeneratingsubstudyoftheassailmitrial