Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model

Yu Liu,1 Yang Peng,2 Bimin Zhu,2 Zhihua Xia,1 Yonghua Yuan,3 Fujun Zhang4 1Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pharmacy, Dianjiang County People’s Hospital, Chongqing, 408300, People’s Re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhu B, Xia Z, Yuan Y, Zhang F
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/implementing-cancer-pain-management-training-for-pharmacists-using-the-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592065529118720
author Liu Y
Peng Y
Zhu B
Xia Z
Yuan Y
Zhang F
author_facet Liu Y
Peng Y
Zhu B
Xia Z
Yuan Y
Zhang F
author_sort Liu Y
collection DOAJ
description Yu Liu,1 Yang Peng,2 Bimin Zhu,2 Zhihua Xia,1 Yonghua Yuan,3 Fujun Zhang4 1Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pharmacy, Dianjiang County People’s Hospital, Chongqing, 408300, People’s Republic of China; 3College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Fujun Zhang, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of China, Email cnzfj@cqmu.edu.cnPurpose: To develop a training program on cancer pain management for pharmacists and to evaluate the effectiveness of the training.Methods: The program developed a well-structured curriculum and subsequent evaluation of training effectiveness, guided by the Kirkpatrick four-tier evaluation model, including reaction, learning, behavior, and results. The training approach incorporated mentoring, study groups, and problem-based learning to create an immersive and impactful learning experience.Results: Fifty-three pharmacists participated in the survey. The reaction evaluation results showed that the cumulative percentage of “satisfied” and “very satisfied” with each of the nine statements exceeded 85%. The findings from the learning level assessment revealed that the cumulative percentage of accurate responses to the 13 items on the Cancer Pain Management Questionnaire was 57.7% before training. This percentage rose to 64.2% following the training, showcasing a statistically significant improvement (p=0.014). The behavioral scoring results showed that 53 trainees scored an average of more than 15 points on all four behavioral benchmarks. The pass rate for the trainees was 86.8%. The percentages of trainees who scored proficient, good, and excellent were 18.9% (10/53), 50.9% (27/53), and 17.0% (9/53), respectively. The evaluation of the results showed that all the respondents were engaged in cancer pain management practices. Of these participants, 85.7% (42/49) were members of a multidisciplinary cancer pain management team, and 53.1% (26/49) performed a cancer pain consultation or attended an outpatient clinic.Conclusion: Study results suggested that the training program was effective in all dimensions defined by the Kirkpatrick model. This collective achievement indicates a substantial enhancement in the comprehension and proficiency of pharmacists regarding cancer pain management.Keywords: pharmacist, cancer pain management, continuing education, evaluation of training effectiveness, Kirkpatrick four-tier evaluation model
format Article
id doaj-art-57cd5458df114c4cbd1d54d1d28208b1
institution Kabale University
issn 1178-7090
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Pain Research
spelling doaj-art-57cd5458df114c4cbd1d54d1d28208b12025-01-21T16:58:06ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902025-01-01Volume 1830531499423Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation ModelLiu YPeng YZhu BXia ZYuan YZhang FYu Liu,1 Yang Peng,2 Bimin Zhu,2 Zhihua Xia,1 Yonghua Yuan,3 Fujun Zhang4 1Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pharmacy, Dianjiang County People’s Hospital, Chongqing, 408300, People’s Republic of China; 3College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Fujun Zhang, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, People’s Republic of China, Email cnzfj@cqmu.edu.cnPurpose: To develop a training program on cancer pain management for pharmacists and to evaluate the effectiveness of the training.Methods: The program developed a well-structured curriculum and subsequent evaluation of training effectiveness, guided by the Kirkpatrick four-tier evaluation model, including reaction, learning, behavior, and results. The training approach incorporated mentoring, study groups, and problem-based learning to create an immersive and impactful learning experience.Results: Fifty-three pharmacists participated in the survey. The reaction evaluation results showed that the cumulative percentage of “satisfied” and “very satisfied” with each of the nine statements exceeded 85%. The findings from the learning level assessment revealed that the cumulative percentage of accurate responses to the 13 items on the Cancer Pain Management Questionnaire was 57.7% before training. This percentage rose to 64.2% following the training, showcasing a statistically significant improvement (p=0.014). The behavioral scoring results showed that 53 trainees scored an average of more than 15 points on all four behavioral benchmarks. The pass rate for the trainees was 86.8%. The percentages of trainees who scored proficient, good, and excellent were 18.9% (10/53), 50.9% (27/53), and 17.0% (9/53), respectively. The evaluation of the results showed that all the respondents were engaged in cancer pain management practices. Of these participants, 85.7% (42/49) were members of a multidisciplinary cancer pain management team, and 53.1% (26/49) performed a cancer pain consultation or attended an outpatient clinic.Conclusion: Study results suggested that the training program was effective in all dimensions defined by the Kirkpatrick model. This collective achievement indicates a substantial enhancement in the comprehension and proficiency of pharmacists regarding cancer pain management.Keywords: pharmacist, cancer pain management, continuing education, evaluation of training effectiveness, Kirkpatrick four-tier evaluation modelhttps://www.dovepress.com/implementing-cancer-pain-management-training-for-pharmacists-using-the-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPRpharmacistcancer pain managementcontinuing educationevaluation of training effectivenesskirkpatrick four-tier evaluation model
spellingShingle Liu Y
Peng Y
Zhu B
Xia Z
Yuan Y
Zhang F
Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
Journal of Pain Research
pharmacist
cancer pain management
continuing education
evaluation of training effectiveness
kirkpatrick four-tier evaluation model
title Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
title_full Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
title_fullStr Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
title_full_unstemmed Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
title_short Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
title_sort implementing cancer pain management training for pharmacists using the kirkpatrick evaluation model
topic pharmacist
cancer pain management
continuing education
evaluation of training effectiveness
kirkpatrick four-tier evaluation model
url https://www.dovepress.com/implementing-cancer-pain-management-training-for-pharmacists-using-the-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT liuy implementingcancerpainmanagementtrainingforpharmacistsusingthekirkpatrickevaluationmodel
AT pengy implementingcancerpainmanagementtrainingforpharmacistsusingthekirkpatrickevaluationmodel
AT zhub implementingcancerpainmanagementtrainingforpharmacistsusingthekirkpatrickevaluationmodel
AT xiaz implementingcancerpainmanagementtrainingforpharmacistsusingthekirkpatrickevaluationmodel
AT yuany implementingcancerpainmanagementtrainingforpharmacistsusingthekirkpatrickevaluationmodel
AT zhangf implementingcancerpainmanagementtrainingforpharmacistsusingthekirkpatrickevaluationmodel