Harmonizing satellite thermal data with ground-based observations for climate long-term monitoring

Estimating land surface temperature (LST) in urban environments remains a complex task due to high surface heterogeneity and variations in material emissivity. This study compares LST products from four satellite sensors (Landsat 8 TIRS, ECOSTRESS, MODIS Terra, and Sentinel-3 SLSTR) with in-situ tem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Głowienka, E. S. Malinverni, M. Sanità, K. Michałowska, M. Kucza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-05-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-M-7-2025/127/2025/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-7-2025-127-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Estimating land surface temperature (LST) in urban environments remains a complex task due to high surface heterogeneity and variations in material emissivity. This study compares LST products from four satellite sensors (Landsat 8 TIRS, ECOSTRESS, MODIS Terra, and Sentinel-3 SLSTR) with in-situ temperature measurements recorded by 27 ground-based sensors placed across diverse urban surface types in Krak&oacute;w, Poland.<br />To minimize cross-platform discrepancies, a harmonization workflow was applied, including spatial reprojection, temporal alignment within a &plusmn;15-minute window, and emissivity normalization. Residuals were assessed using standard validation metrics: RMSE, MAE, bias, and Pearson&rsquo;s correlation coefficient. Among the examined datasets, Landsat 8 delivered the most consistent results (RMSE &asymp; 7.7&deg;C), while ECOSTRESS exhibited the highest positive bias and spatial variability. Residual errors were notably larger over vegetated areas, reflecting the effects of variable emissivity and canopy shading.<br />Despite the observed errors, the harmonized dataset enables consistent comparisons between sensors and an effective thermal assessment of urban areas. The results highlight the methodological relevance of harmonization in thermal remote sensing, particularly in heterogeneous urban areas.
ISSN:1682-1750
2194-9034