Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia

Objective. To study the safety and efficacy of microtransesophageal echocardiography (micro-TEE) and TEE during percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. Background. TEE has proven to be safe during ASD and PFO closure under general anaesthesia. Micro-TEE makes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roel J. R. Snijder, Laura E. Renes, Martin J. Swaans, Maarten Jan Suttorp, Jurrien M. Ten Berg, Martijn C. Post
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1462140
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546942111973376
author Roel J. R. Snijder
Laura E. Renes
Martin J. Swaans
Maarten Jan Suttorp
Jurrien M. Ten Berg
Martijn C. Post
author_facet Roel J. R. Snijder
Laura E. Renes
Martin J. Swaans
Maarten Jan Suttorp
Jurrien M. Ten Berg
Martijn C. Post
author_sort Roel J. R. Snijder
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To study the safety and efficacy of microtransesophageal echocardiography (micro-TEE) and TEE during percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. Background. TEE has proven to be safe during ASD and PFO closure under general anaesthesia. Micro-TEE makes it possible to perform these procedures under local anaesthesia. We are the first to describe the safety and efficacy of micro-TEE for percutaneous closure. Methods. All consecutive patients who underwent ASD and PFO closure between 2013 and 2018 were included. The periprocedural complications were registered. Residual shunts were diagnosed using transthoracic contrast echocardiography (TTCE). All data were compared between the use of TEE or micro-TEE within the ASD and PFO groups separately. Results. In total, 82 patients underwent ASD closure, 46 patients (49.1 ± 15.0 years) with TEE and 36 patients (47.8 ± 12.1 years) using micro-TEE guidance. Median device diameter was, respectively, 26 mm (range 10–40 mm) and 27 mm (range 10–35 mm). PFO closure was performed in 120 patients, 55 patients (48.6 ± 9.2 years, median device diameter 25 mm, range 23–35 mm) with TEE and 65 patients (mean age 51.0 ± 11.8 years, median device diameter 27 mm, range 23–35 mm) using micro-TEE. There were no major periprocedural complications, especially no device embolizations within all groups. Six months after closure, there was no significant difference in left-to-right shunt after ASD closure and no significant difference in right-to-left shunt after PFO closure using TEE or micro-TEE. Conclusion. Micro-TEE guidance without general anaesthesia during percutaneous ASD and PFO closure is as safe as TEE, without a significant difference in the residual shunt rate after closure.
format Article
id doaj-art-57a4f89fca5541de8166110ea1ee1872
institution Kabale University
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-57a4f89fca5541de8166110ea1ee18722025-02-03T06:46:34ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832020-01-01202010.1155/2020/14621401462140Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General AnaesthesiaRoel J. R. Snijder0Laura E. Renes1Martin J. Swaans2Maarten Jan Suttorp3Jurrien M. Ten Berg4Martijn C. Post5Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, NetherlandsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, NetherlandsObjective. To study the safety and efficacy of microtransesophageal echocardiography (micro-TEE) and TEE during percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. Background. TEE has proven to be safe during ASD and PFO closure under general anaesthesia. Micro-TEE makes it possible to perform these procedures under local anaesthesia. We are the first to describe the safety and efficacy of micro-TEE for percutaneous closure. Methods. All consecutive patients who underwent ASD and PFO closure between 2013 and 2018 were included. The periprocedural complications were registered. Residual shunts were diagnosed using transthoracic contrast echocardiography (TTCE). All data were compared between the use of TEE or micro-TEE within the ASD and PFO groups separately. Results. In total, 82 patients underwent ASD closure, 46 patients (49.1 ± 15.0 years) with TEE and 36 patients (47.8 ± 12.1 years) using micro-TEE guidance. Median device diameter was, respectively, 26 mm (range 10–40 mm) and 27 mm (range 10–35 mm). PFO closure was performed in 120 patients, 55 patients (48.6 ± 9.2 years, median device diameter 25 mm, range 23–35 mm) with TEE and 65 patients (mean age 51.0 ± 11.8 years, median device diameter 27 mm, range 23–35 mm) using micro-TEE. There were no major periprocedural complications, especially no device embolizations within all groups. Six months after closure, there was no significant difference in left-to-right shunt after ASD closure and no significant difference in right-to-left shunt after PFO closure using TEE or micro-TEE. Conclusion. Micro-TEE guidance without general anaesthesia during percutaneous ASD and PFO closure is as safe as TEE, without a significant difference in the residual shunt rate after closure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1462140
spellingShingle Roel J. R. Snijder
Laura E. Renes
Martin J. Swaans
Maarten Jan Suttorp
Jurrien M. Ten Berg
Martijn C. Post
Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia
title_full Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia
title_fullStr Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia
title_short Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia
title_sort microtransesophageal echocardiographic guidance during percutaneous interatrial septal closure without general anaesthesia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1462140
work_keys_str_mv AT roeljrsnijder microtransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceduringpercutaneousinteratrialseptalclosurewithoutgeneralanaesthesia
AT lauraerenes microtransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceduringpercutaneousinteratrialseptalclosurewithoutgeneralanaesthesia
AT martinjswaans microtransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceduringpercutaneousinteratrialseptalclosurewithoutgeneralanaesthesia
AT maartenjansuttorp microtransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceduringpercutaneousinteratrialseptalclosurewithoutgeneralanaesthesia
AT jurrienmtenberg microtransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceduringpercutaneousinteratrialseptalclosurewithoutgeneralanaesthesia
AT martijncpost microtransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceduringpercutaneousinteratrialseptalclosurewithoutgeneralanaesthesia