Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic context

Drawing on the Significance Quest Theory (Kruglanski et al., 2022), we used the Honor Dictionary (Gelfand et al., 2015) in a word frequency textual analysis (Pennebaker et al., 2007) to investigate extreme rhetoric. We thus conducted two studies. The first, investigating the political context, compa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriele Di Cicco, Federico Contu, Laura Prislei, Michele J. Gelfand, Arie W. Kruglanski, Erica Molinario
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622725000127
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850113505757233152
author Gabriele Di Cicco
Federico Contu
Laura Prislei
Michele J. Gelfand
Arie W. Kruglanski
Erica Molinario
author_facet Gabriele Di Cicco
Federico Contu
Laura Prislei
Michele J. Gelfand
Arie W. Kruglanski
Erica Molinario
author_sort Gabriele Di Cicco
collection DOAJ
description Drawing on the Significance Quest Theory (Kruglanski et al., 2022), we used the Honor Dictionary (Gelfand et al., 2015) in a word frequency textual analysis (Pennebaker et al., 2007) to investigate extreme rhetoric. We thus conducted two studies. The first, investigating the political context, compared speeches of fascist dictator Benito Mussolini (1918–1945, N = 284) with those of democratic Presidents of the Italian Republic (1949–2006, N = 901). The second, focused on lone-actors terrorists, examined texts from the Extremist Manifesto Database (EMD, Grigoryan et al., 2023) and compared writings by terrorists driven by political ideologies (left & right-wing, ethno-nationalists, and anti-government, N = 65) with those of terrorists motivated by religious ideologies (N = 23). Notably, we hypothesized and found that, compared to democratic rhetoric, fascist rhetoric contained (a) more words expressing feelings of lost honor and (b) fewer words reflecting gaining honor. Moreover, as expected, we found that lone-actor religious terrorists' rhetoric, compared to lone-actor political terrorists, contained more words expressing feelings of lost honor and fewer words expressing honor gain. Notably, this is the first research to use the Honor Dictionary to linguistically measure the activation of the need for significance, demonstrating a strong correlation with the endorsement of extreme ideologies. Further, our research supports the hypothesis that extreme rhetoric reflects–and aims to induce–significance loss feelings.
format Article
id doaj-art-577cfaf6ef624a89a088fa6b9035c952
institution OA Journals
issn 2666-6227
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
spelling doaj-art-577cfaf6ef624a89a088fa6b9035c9522025-08-20T02:37:09ZengElsevierCurrent Research in Ecological and Social Psychology2666-62272025-01-01810022510.1016/j.cresp.2025.100225Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic contextGabriele Di Cicco0Federico Contu1Laura Prislei2Michele J. Gelfand3Arie W. Kruglanski4Erica Molinario5Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-06, Kraków, Poland; Center for Peace and Conflict Studies, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; Corresponding authors at: Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków 30-060, Poland.Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-06, Kraków, Poland; UniSR-Social.Lab, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Centro Direzionale Milano 2, Palazzo Cellini, 20054, Milan, ItalyDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, ItalyStanford Graduate School of Business and Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USADepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USAInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-06, Kraków, Poland; Department of Psychology, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL 33965, USA; Corresponding authors at: Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Kraków 30-060, Poland.Drawing on the Significance Quest Theory (Kruglanski et al., 2022), we used the Honor Dictionary (Gelfand et al., 2015) in a word frequency textual analysis (Pennebaker et al., 2007) to investigate extreme rhetoric. We thus conducted two studies. The first, investigating the political context, compared speeches of fascist dictator Benito Mussolini (1918–1945, N = 284) with those of democratic Presidents of the Italian Republic (1949–2006, N = 901). The second, focused on lone-actors terrorists, examined texts from the Extremist Manifesto Database (EMD, Grigoryan et al., 2023) and compared writings by terrorists driven by political ideologies (left & right-wing, ethno-nationalists, and anti-government, N = 65) with those of terrorists motivated by religious ideologies (N = 23). Notably, we hypothesized and found that, compared to democratic rhetoric, fascist rhetoric contained (a) more words expressing feelings of lost honor and (b) fewer words reflecting gaining honor. Moreover, as expected, we found that lone-actor religious terrorists' rhetoric, compared to lone-actor political terrorists, contained more words expressing feelings of lost honor and fewer words expressing honor gain. Notably, this is the first research to use the Honor Dictionary to linguistically measure the activation of the need for significance, demonstrating a strong correlation with the endorsement of extreme ideologies. Further, our research supports the hypothesis that extreme rhetoric reflects–and aims to induce–significance loss feelings.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622725000127HonorSignificance lossExtremismText analysis
spellingShingle Gabriele Di Cicco
Federico Contu
Laura Prislei
Michele J. Gelfand
Arie W. Kruglanski
Erica Molinario
Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic context
Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
Honor
Significance loss
Extremism
Text analysis
title Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic context
title_full Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic context
title_fullStr Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic context
title_full_unstemmed Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic context
title_short Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies: Evidence from the political and the terroristic context
title_sort significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies evidence from the political and the terroristic context
topic Honor
Significance loss
Extremism
Text analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622725000127
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrieledicicco significancelossastherhetoricofextremeideologiesevidencefromthepoliticalandtheterroristiccontext
AT federicocontu significancelossastherhetoricofextremeideologiesevidencefromthepoliticalandtheterroristiccontext
AT lauraprislei significancelossastherhetoricofextremeideologiesevidencefromthepoliticalandtheterroristiccontext
AT michelejgelfand significancelossastherhetoricofextremeideologiesevidencefromthepoliticalandtheterroristiccontext
AT ariewkruglanski significancelossastherhetoricofextremeideologiesevidencefromthepoliticalandtheterroristiccontext
AT ericamolinario significancelossastherhetoricofextremeideologiesevidencefromthepoliticalandtheterroristiccontext