Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian context
The article discusses laboratory discourse on the basis of Zara Abdullaeva's interviews with the theatre director and theorist Anatoly Vasiliev. Discourse analysis is becoming a method of analysis in theatrical studies. In particular, it is proposed to see the premises of a theatrical laborato...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | Шаги |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/52 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849716480060424192 |
|---|---|
| author | Yu. G. Liderman |
| author_facet | Yu. G. Liderman |
| author_sort | Yu. G. Liderman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article discusses laboratory discourse on the basis of Zara Abdullaeva's interviews with the theatre director and theorist Anatoly Vasiliev. Discourse analysis is becoming a method of analysis in theatrical studies. In particular, it is proposed to see the premises of a theatrical laboratory in production aesthetics. The article outlines the connection between laboratory theaters and productivist art and productivism (Boris Arvatov, Walter Benjamin). Thanks to the institutional criticism of the laboratory by Bruno Latour, the question is raised about the possibilities of mutual influence of laboratory theaters and society. Laboratory theater is considered in the article as a paratype of participatory art (Claire Bishop). The article provides information about the history of and research into laboratory theater in Russia. The method of discourse analysis is used in the article in relation to the recorded interviews of Anatoly Vasiliev and the interviewer Zara Abdullaeva. The mechanisms of the laboratory's influence on society identified by Bruno Latour allow us to take a fresh look at the various laboratory activities of Anatoly Vasiliev and at the comments and clarifications that he makes after the fact in relation to them. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-57191014fdb547c4a2cba4b3ca2bc8fd |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2412-9410 2782-1765 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
| publisher | Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Шаги |
| spelling | doaj-art-57191014fdb547c4a2cba4b3ca2bc8fd2025-08-20T03:12:58ZengRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPAШаги2412-94102782-17652022-03-018116117510.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-1-161-17551Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian contextYu. G. Liderman0Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФThe article discusses laboratory discourse on the basis of Zara Abdullaeva's interviews with the theatre director and theorist Anatoly Vasiliev. Discourse analysis is becoming a method of analysis in theatrical studies. In particular, it is proposed to see the premises of a theatrical laboratory in production aesthetics. The article outlines the connection between laboratory theaters and productivist art and productivism (Boris Arvatov, Walter Benjamin). Thanks to the institutional criticism of the laboratory by Bruno Latour, the question is raised about the possibilities of mutual influence of laboratory theaters and society. Laboratory theater is considered in the article as a paratype of participatory art (Claire Bishop). The article provides information about the history of and research into laboratory theater in Russia. The method of discourse analysis is used in the article in relation to the recorded interviews of Anatoly Vasiliev and the interviewer Zara Abdullaeva. The mechanisms of the laboratory's influence on society identified by Bruno Latour allow us to take a fresh look at the various laboratory activities of Anatoly Vasiliev and at the comments and clarifications that he makes after the fact in relation to them.https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/52laboratory theaterboris arvatovwalter benjaminbruno latouranatoly vasilievtheater theorysociology of arttheatrical eventmodernismdiscourse analysisrussian experimental theatrehistory of russian theatre20th century |
| spellingShingle | Yu. G. Liderman Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian context Шаги laboratory theater boris arvatov walter benjamin bruno latour anatoly vasiliev theater theory sociology of art theatrical event modernism discourse analysis russian experimental theatre history of russian theatre 20th century |
| title | Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian context |
| title_full | Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian context |
| title_fullStr | Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian context |
| title_full_unstemmed | Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian context |
| title_short | Theatrical research of laboratory discourse: Concepts, history of ideas, Russian context |
| title_sort | theatrical research of laboratory discourse concepts history of ideas russian context |
| topic | laboratory theater boris arvatov walter benjamin bruno latour anatoly vasiliev theater theory sociology of art theatrical event modernism discourse analysis russian experimental theatre history of russian theatre 20th century |
| url | https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/52 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yugliderman theatricalresearchoflaboratorydiscourseconceptshistoryofideasrussiancontext |