A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices

Abstract Managing actively bleeding gastric varices (GV) is clinically challenging. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) using large-volume ligators compared with endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO) in managing actively bleeding GV. Patients who were diagnos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ding Shi, Guojing Xu, Weijin Pan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12600-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849237842872500224
author Ding Shi
Guojing Xu
Weijin Pan
author_facet Ding Shi
Guojing Xu
Weijin Pan
author_sort Ding Shi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Managing actively bleeding gastric varices (GV) is clinically challenging. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) using large-volume ligators compared with endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO) in managing actively bleeding GV. Patients who were diagnosed with active GV bleeding via endoscopy and underwent EBL with large-volume band ligators or EVO were enrolled. Follow-up endoscopy was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after endoscopic treatment. Primary outcomes were the initial haemostasis success rate, GV eradication rate within 3 months, 1-week rebleeding rate, 6-month cumulative rebleeding rate, and recurrence rate within 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the rate and average volume of blood transfusions in patients with rebleeding and adverse events related to endoscopic treatment. Overall, 154 patients were included (EBL group: n = 77; EVO group: n = 77). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the initial haemostasis success rate, 1-week rebleeding rate, 3-month GV eradication rate and average number of sessions to GV eradication, cumulative rebleeding rate, and recurrence rate within 6 months. Three of the nine patients with rebleeding in the EVO group required blood transfusion with an average blood transfusion volume that was significantly lower than that required by the five patients with rebleeding in the EBL group (P = 0.024). The fever rate was lower in the EBL group than in the EVO group (P = 0.011). In the EVO group, one patient developed a pulmonary embolism and died during treatment, and three patients developed postoperative sepsis. The short-term efficacy of EBL with large-volume ligators in the treatment of actively bleeding GV is similar to that of EVO; however, postoperative rebleeding is often more dangerous in EBL than in EVO. Therefore, EBL represents a viable alternative in emergency endoscopic control of GV bleeding, provided that a contingency plan for early band slippage-related rebleeding is implemented. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR1900027588, 19/11/2019).
format Article
id doaj-art-56de9eaf200e4ca08fc03cfe6dc81c64
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-56de9eaf200e4ca08fc03cfe6dc81c642025-08-20T04:01:51ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-07-0115111110.1038/s41598-025-12600-8A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varicesDing Shi0Guojing Xu1Weijin Pan2Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Henan University of Traditional Chinese MedicineDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of YongkangAbstract Managing actively bleeding gastric varices (GV) is clinically challenging. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) using large-volume ligators compared with endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO) in managing actively bleeding GV. Patients who were diagnosed with active GV bleeding via endoscopy and underwent EBL with large-volume band ligators or EVO were enrolled. Follow-up endoscopy was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after endoscopic treatment. Primary outcomes were the initial haemostasis success rate, GV eradication rate within 3 months, 1-week rebleeding rate, 6-month cumulative rebleeding rate, and recurrence rate within 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the rate and average volume of blood transfusions in patients with rebleeding and adverse events related to endoscopic treatment. Overall, 154 patients were included (EBL group: n = 77; EVO group: n = 77). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the initial haemostasis success rate, 1-week rebleeding rate, 3-month GV eradication rate and average number of sessions to GV eradication, cumulative rebleeding rate, and recurrence rate within 6 months. Three of the nine patients with rebleeding in the EVO group required blood transfusion with an average blood transfusion volume that was significantly lower than that required by the five patients with rebleeding in the EBL group (P = 0.024). The fever rate was lower in the EBL group than in the EVO group (P = 0.011). In the EVO group, one patient developed a pulmonary embolism and died during treatment, and three patients developed postoperative sepsis. The short-term efficacy of EBL with large-volume ligators in the treatment of actively bleeding GV is similar to that of EVO; however, postoperative rebleeding is often more dangerous in EBL than in EVO. Therefore, EBL represents a viable alternative in emergency endoscopic control of GV bleeding, provided that a contingency plan for early band slippage-related rebleeding is implemented. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR1900027588, 19/11/2019).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12600-8Gastric varicesEndoscopic band ligationEndoscopic injectionHaemostasis
spellingShingle Ding Shi
Guojing Xu
Weijin Pan
A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices
Scientific Reports
Gastric varices
Endoscopic band ligation
Endoscopic injection
Haemostasis
title A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing large-volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing large volume band ligator and cyanoacrylate injection in the endoscopic management of actively bleeding gastric varices
topic Gastric varices
Endoscopic band ligation
Endoscopic injection
Haemostasis
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12600-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dingshi arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinglargevolumebandligatorandcyanoacrylateinjectionintheendoscopicmanagementofactivelybleedinggastricvarices
AT guojingxu arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinglargevolumebandligatorandcyanoacrylateinjectionintheendoscopicmanagementofactivelybleedinggastricvarices
AT weijinpan arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinglargevolumebandligatorandcyanoacrylateinjectionintheendoscopicmanagementofactivelybleedinggastricvarices
AT dingshi randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinglargevolumebandligatorandcyanoacrylateinjectionintheendoscopicmanagementofactivelybleedinggastricvarices
AT guojingxu randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinglargevolumebandligatorandcyanoacrylateinjectionintheendoscopicmanagementofactivelybleedinggastricvarices
AT weijinpan randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparinglargevolumebandligatorandcyanoacrylateinjectionintheendoscopicmanagementofactivelybleedinggastricvarices