Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>In the United States, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded public and private health coverage, increased health insurance affordability, reduced healthcare costs, and improved healthcare quality for many. Despite ACA provisions, lack of insurance and other factors co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allison Gilchrist, Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath Fernando, Paula Holland, Faraz Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314620
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841555456514850816
author Allison Gilchrist
Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath Fernando
Paula Holland
Faraz Ahmed
author_facet Allison Gilchrist
Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath Fernando
Paula Holland
Faraz Ahmed
author_sort Allison Gilchrist
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>In the United States, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded public and private health coverage, increased health insurance affordability, reduced healthcare costs, and improved healthcare quality for many. Despite ACA provisions, lack of insurance and other factors continue to affect working-age women's access to primary care services.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a mixed-method systematic review to identify factors that affect women's access to primary care services since the ACA. In January 2021, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched from 2010 to 2021 and an updated search was conducted in October 2023. We included 26 quantitative and qualitative studies reporting determinants, barriers and facilitators of women's primary care access for women (18 to 64 years). Studies reporting measures of potential access, such as health insurance, and measures of realized access-healthcare service utilization, were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (2018) was used to rate the quality of studies. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use guided the narrative synthesis.<h4>Findings</h4>We found consistent evidence that ACA provisions expanding state Medicaid eligibility led to improved insurance coverage, especially for lower-income groups. We found mixed evidence of associations between individual-level determinants, such as age, education, race/ethnicity, income, and different measures of access. Limited qualitative evidence suggests that insurance coverage, low-cost care, positive patient-provider relationships, social support, and translation services enhance access for immigrants and refugees. Barriers include lack of coverage, high healthcare costs, culturally unresponsive healthcare services, poor patient-provider relationships, and transportation issues.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Adoption of ACA's expanded Medicaid eligibility criteria would expand insurance coverage to women living in non-expansion states. Innovative healthcare policies, programs, and interventions at the federal, state, and local levels are needed. Suggested strategies include interventions expanding primary healthcare service availability and patient navigation services, and promotion of health literacy, culturally sensitive services, and provider bias education/training.
format Article
id doaj-art-56806e73e413448096b186a1366383b2
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-56806e73e413448096b186a1366383b22025-01-08T05:32:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031462010.1371/journal.pone.0314620Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.Allison GilchristGunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath FernandoPaula HollandFaraz Ahmed<h4>Background</h4>In the United States, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded public and private health coverage, increased health insurance affordability, reduced healthcare costs, and improved healthcare quality for many. Despite ACA provisions, lack of insurance and other factors continue to affect working-age women's access to primary care services.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a mixed-method systematic review to identify factors that affect women's access to primary care services since the ACA. In January 2021, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched from 2010 to 2021 and an updated search was conducted in October 2023. We included 26 quantitative and qualitative studies reporting determinants, barriers and facilitators of women's primary care access for women (18 to 64 years). Studies reporting measures of potential access, such as health insurance, and measures of realized access-healthcare service utilization, were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (2018) was used to rate the quality of studies. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use guided the narrative synthesis.<h4>Findings</h4>We found consistent evidence that ACA provisions expanding state Medicaid eligibility led to improved insurance coverage, especially for lower-income groups. We found mixed evidence of associations between individual-level determinants, such as age, education, race/ethnicity, income, and different measures of access. Limited qualitative evidence suggests that insurance coverage, low-cost care, positive patient-provider relationships, social support, and translation services enhance access for immigrants and refugees. Barriers include lack of coverage, high healthcare costs, culturally unresponsive healthcare services, poor patient-provider relationships, and transportation issues.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Adoption of ACA's expanded Medicaid eligibility criteria would expand insurance coverage to women living in non-expansion states. Innovative healthcare policies, programs, and interventions at the federal, state, and local levels are needed. Suggested strategies include interventions expanding primary healthcare service availability and patient navigation services, and promotion of health literacy, culturally sensitive services, and provider bias education/training.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314620
spellingShingle Allison Gilchrist
Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath Fernando
Paula Holland
Faraz Ahmed
Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.
PLoS ONE
title Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.
title_full Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.
title_fullStr Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.
title_short Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.
title_sort factors affecting women s access to primary care in the united states since the affordable care act a mixed methods systematic review
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314620
work_keys_str_mv AT allisongilchrist factorsaffectingwomensaccesstoprimarycareintheunitedstatessincetheaffordablecareactamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT gunasekaravidanamestrigechamathfernando factorsaffectingwomensaccesstoprimarycareintheunitedstatessincetheaffordablecareactamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT paulaholland factorsaffectingwomensaccesstoprimarycareintheunitedstatessincetheaffordablecareactamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT farazahmed factorsaffectingwomensaccesstoprimarycareintheunitedstatessincetheaffordablecareactamixedmethodssystematicreview