Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA Therapeutics

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> After many years of research and the successful development of therapeutic products by a few industrial actors, the COVID-19 vaccines brought messenger RNAs, as well as other nucleic acid modalities, such as antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maxime Tufeu, Christophe Herkenne, Yogeshvar N. Kalia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/7/903
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849419033817907200
author Maxime Tufeu
Christophe Herkenne
Yogeshvar N. Kalia
author_facet Maxime Tufeu
Christophe Herkenne
Yogeshvar N. Kalia
author_sort Maxime Tufeu
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background/Objectives:</b> After many years of research and the successful development of therapeutic products by a few industrial actors, the COVID-19 vaccines brought messenger RNAs, as well as other nucleic acid modalities, such as antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA, and aptamers, into the spotlight, eliciting renewed interest from both academia and industry. However, owing to their structure, relative “fragility”, and the (usually) intracellular site of action, the delivery of these therapeutics has frequently proven to be a key limitation, especially when considering endosomal escape, which still needs to be overcome. <b>Methods</b>: By compiling delivery-related data on approved and late clinical-phase ribonucleic acid therapeutics, this review aims to assess the delivery strategies that have proven to be successful or are emerging, as well as areas where more research is needed. <b>Results</b>: In very specific cases, some strategies appeared to be quite effective, such as the N-acetylgalactosamine moiety in the case of liver delivery. Surprisingly, it also appears that for some modalities, efforts in molecular design have led to more “drug-like” properties, enablingthe administration of naked nucleic acids, without any form of encapsulation. This appears to be especially true when local administration, i.e., by injection, is possible, as this provides de facto targeting and a high local concentration, which can compensate for the small proportion of nucleic acids that reach the cytoplasm. <b>Conclusions</b>: Nucleic acid-based therapeutics have come a long way in terms of their physicochemical properties. However, due to their inherent limitations, targeting appears to be crucial for their efficacy, even more so than for traditional pharmaceutical modalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-5676b69f88aa4c69b98f6acedb910ff9
institution Kabale University
issn 1999-4923
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceutics
spelling doaj-art-5676b69f88aa4c69b98f6acedb910ff92025-08-20T03:32:15ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232025-07-0117790310.3390/pharmaceutics17070903Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA TherapeuticsMaxime Tufeu0Christophe Herkenne1Yogeshvar N. Kalia2School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, SwitzerlandDebiopharm Research and Manufacturing, 1920 Martigny, SwitzerlandSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland<b>Background/Objectives:</b> After many years of research and the successful development of therapeutic products by a few industrial actors, the COVID-19 vaccines brought messenger RNAs, as well as other nucleic acid modalities, such as antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA, and aptamers, into the spotlight, eliciting renewed interest from both academia and industry. However, owing to their structure, relative “fragility”, and the (usually) intracellular site of action, the delivery of these therapeutics has frequently proven to be a key limitation, especially when considering endosomal escape, which still needs to be overcome. <b>Methods</b>: By compiling delivery-related data on approved and late clinical-phase ribonucleic acid therapeutics, this review aims to assess the delivery strategies that have proven to be successful or are emerging, as well as areas where more research is needed. <b>Results</b>: In very specific cases, some strategies appeared to be quite effective, such as the N-acetylgalactosamine moiety in the case of liver delivery. Surprisingly, it also appears that for some modalities, efforts in molecular design have led to more “drug-like” properties, enablingthe administration of naked nucleic acids, without any form of encapsulation. This appears to be especially true when local administration, i.e., by injection, is possible, as this provides de facto targeting and a high local concentration, which can compensate for the small proportion of nucleic acids that reach the cytoplasm. <b>Conclusions</b>: Nucleic acid-based therapeutics have come a long way in terms of their physicochemical properties. However, due to their inherent limitations, targeting appears to be crucial for their efficacy, even more so than for traditional pharmaceutical modalities.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/7/903nucleic acidsdeliverytargetingtopicallocal administrationendosomal escape
spellingShingle Maxime Tufeu
Christophe Herkenne
Yogeshvar N. Kalia
Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA Therapeutics
Pharmaceutics
nucleic acids
delivery
targeting
topical
local administration
endosomal escape
title Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA Therapeutics
title_full Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA Therapeutics
title_fullStr Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA Therapeutics
title_full_unstemmed Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA Therapeutics
title_short Trends and Commonalities of Approved and Late Clinical-Phase RNA Therapeutics
title_sort trends and commonalities of approved and late clinical phase rna therapeutics
topic nucleic acids
delivery
targeting
topical
local administration
endosomal escape
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/7/903
work_keys_str_mv AT maximetufeu trendsandcommonalitiesofapprovedandlateclinicalphasernatherapeutics
AT christopheherkenne trendsandcommonalitiesofapprovedandlateclinicalphasernatherapeutics
AT yogeshvarnkalia trendsandcommonalitiesofapprovedandlateclinicalphasernatherapeutics