Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults
Objective. To compare values from predictive equations of resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults. Methods. Eighty-two participants aged 30 to 60 year...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2011-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Obesity |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/534714 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832559345220452352 |
|---|---|
| author | Erick Prado de Oliveira Fábio Lera Orsatti Okesley Teixeira Nailza Maestá Roberto Carlos Burini |
| author_facet | Erick Prado de Oliveira Fábio Lera Orsatti Okesley Teixeira Nailza Maestá Roberto Carlos Burini |
| author_sort | Erick Prado de Oliveira |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective. To
compare values from predictive equations of
resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect
calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults.
Methods. Eighty-two
participants aged 30 to 60 years old were
retrospectively analyzed. The persons had a body
mass index ≥25 kg/m2.
REE was estimated by IC and other five equations
of the literature (Harris and Benedict, WHO1, WHO2,
Owen, Mifflin). Results. All
equations had different values when compared to
those of IC. The best values were found by
Harris and Benedict, WHO1, and WHO2, with high
values of intraclass correlation coefficient and
low values of mean difference. Furthermore, WHO1
and WHO2 showed lower systematic error and
random. Conclusion. No
predictive equations had the same values of REE
as compared to those of indirect calorimetry,
and those which least underestimated REE were
the equations of WHO1, WHO2, and Harris and
Benedict. The next step would be to validate the
new equation proposed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5631b3b7a8a3409abf304a1f9a97b43c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-0708 2090-0716 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2011-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Obesity |
| spelling | doaj-art-5631b3b7a8a3409abf304a1f9a97b43c2025-02-03T01:30:18ZengWileyJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162011-01-01201110.1155/2011/534714534714Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese AdultsErick Prado de Oliveira0Fábio Lera Orsatti1Okesley Teixeira2Nailza Maestá3Roberto Carlos Burini4Department of Public Health, Centre for Physical and Nutritional Metabolism (CeMENutri), São Paulo State University (UNESP), District of Rubião Junior s/no, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilDepartment of Public Health, Centre for Physical and Nutritional Metabolism (CeMENutri), São Paulo State University (UNESP), District of Rubião Junior s/no, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilDepartment of Public Health, Centre for Physical and Nutritional Metabolism (CeMENutri), São Paulo State University (UNESP), District of Rubião Junior s/no, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilDepartment of Public Health, Centre for Physical and Nutritional Metabolism (CeMENutri), São Paulo State University (UNESP), District of Rubião Junior s/no, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilDepartment of Public Health, Centre for Physical and Nutritional Metabolism (CeMENutri), São Paulo State University (UNESP), District of Rubião Junior s/no, 18618-970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilObjective. To compare values from predictive equations of resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults. Methods. Eighty-two participants aged 30 to 60 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The persons had a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2. REE was estimated by IC and other five equations of the literature (Harris and Benedict, WHO1, WHO2, Owen, Mifflin). Results. All equations had different values when compared to those of IC. The best values were found by Harris and Benedict, WHO1, and WHO2, with high values of intraclass correlation coefficient and low values of mean difference. Furthermore, WHO1 and WHO2 showed lower systematic error and random. Conclusion. No predictive equations had the same values of REE as compared to those of indirect calorimetry, and those which least underestimated REE were the equations of WHO1, WHO2, and Harris and Benedict. The next step would be to validate the new equation proposed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/534714 |
| spellingShingle | Erick Prado de Oliveira Fábio Lera Orsatti Okesley Teixeira Nailza Maestá Roberto Carlos Burini Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults Journal of Obesity |
| title | Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults |
| title_full | Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults |
| title_short | Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults |
| title_sort | comparison of predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in overweight and obese adults |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/534714 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT erickpradodeoliveira comparisonofpredictiveequationsforrestingenergyexpenditureinoverweightandobeseadults AT fabioleraorsatti comparisonofpredictiveequationsforrestingenergyexpenditureinoverweightandobeseadults AT okesleyteixeira comparisonofpredictiveequationsforrestingenergyexpenditureinoverweightandobeseadults AT nailzamaesta comparisonofpredictiveequationsforrestingenergyexpenditureinoverweightandobeseadults AT robertocarlosburini comparisonofpredictiveequationsforrestingenergyexpenditureinoverweightandobeseadults |