Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study

Background: Dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty provide excellent range of motion with low dislocation rates. A complication of this design is intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), where the polyethylene (PE) liner dissociates from the femoral head. In older designs, IPD occurred due...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salar Sobhi, BSc, MD, Alan Kop, MSc, PhD, Moreica Pabbruwe, PhD, Christopher W. Jones, BCom, BEng(Hons), MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, FAOrthA, Michael A. Finsterwald, MD, FMH, FRACS, FAOrthA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002814
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861178025115648
author Salar Sobhi, BSc, MD
Alan Kop, MSc, PhD
Moreica Pabbruwe, PhD
Christopher W. Jones, BCom, BEng(Hons), MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, FAOrthA
Michael A. Finsterwald, MD, FMH, FRACS, FAOrthA
author_facet Salar Sobhi, BSc, MD
Alan Kop, MSc, PhD
Moreica Pabbruwe, PhD
Christopher W. Jones, BCom, BEng(Hons), MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, FAOrthA
Michael A. Finsterwald, MD, FMH, FRACS, FAOrthA
author_sort Salar Sobhi, BSc, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty provide excellent range of motion with low dislocation rates. A complication of this design is intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), where the polyethylene (PE) liner dissociates from the femoral head. In older designs, IPD occurred due to a small head size and late PE wear with head-capture-mechanism failure. Routine retrieval analysis identified concerns regarding IPD of modern implants, and scant reporting in the literature led to this retrospective study. Methods: A total of 124 (110 primary, 14 revision) DM implants (mean in situ time 2.0 ± 3.1 years) revised by 20 surgeons across Western Australia between July 2014 and August 2023 were assessed. Demographics, clinical information, mechanisms of failure, and observations at revision arthroplasty were analyzed. The retrieval analysis included an assessment of metal and PE wear mechanisms, corrosion between modular components, and extent of bony attachment to acetabular shells. Results: There were 11 cases of IPD. Of these, 8 (73%) had a documented preceding failed closed reduction, with the remaining 3 revised due to trunnionosis, loosening, and joint instability. Nine out of 11 (82%) cases were female. Although metallic wear and inner-lip impingement of PE bearings were observed, there was no obvious failure mechanism for the other 3 retrieved IPD implants. Conclusions: Most cases of IPD in DM implants occur after failed closed reduction in the setting of a hip dislocation, suggesting an iatrogenic cause of IPD. No implant-related features could be defined for the remaining cases. Recognizing common failure modes can help with the prevention and treatment of this complication.
format Article
id doaj-art-561fcfac57754a78ac0ac05a2ffec2bb
institution Kabale University
issn 2352-3441
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty Today
spelling doaj-art-561fcfac57754a78ac0ac05a2ffec2bb2025-02-10T04:34:29ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412025-02-0131101596Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis StudySalar Sobhi, BSc, MD0Alan Kop, MSc, PhD1Moreica Pabbruwe, PhD2Christopher W. Jones, BCom, BEng(Hons), MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, FAOrthA3Michael A. Finsterwald, MD, FMH, FRACS, FAOrthA4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Orthopaedic Research Foundation Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, 14 Robin Warren Drive, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia. Tel.: + 6 140 346 1850.Centre for Implant Technology and Retrieval Analysis, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaCentre for Implant Technology and Retrieval Analysis, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Orthopaedic Research Foundation Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Orthopaedic Research Foundation Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaBackground: Dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty provide excellent range of motion with low dislocation rates. A complication of this design is intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), where the polyethylene (PE) liner dissociates from the femoral head. In older designs, IPD occurred due to a small head size and late PE wear with head-capture-mechanism failure. Routine retrieval analysis identified concerns regarding IPD of modern implants, and scant reporting in the literature led to this retrospective study. Methods: A total of 124 (110 primary, 14 revision) DM implants (mean in situ time 2.0 ± 3.1 years) revised by 20 surgeons across Western Australia between July 2014 and August 2023 were assessed. Demographics, clinical information, mechanisms of failure, and observations at revision arthroplasty were analyzed. The retrieval analysis included an assessment of metal and PE wear mechanisms, corrosion between modular components, and extent of bony attachment to acetabular shells. Results: There were 11 cases of IPD. Of these, 8 (73%) had a documented preceding failed closed reduction, with the remaining 3 revised due to trunnionosis, loosening, and joint instability. Nine out of 11 (82%) cases were female. Although metallic wear and inner-lip impingement of PE bearings were observed, there was no obvious failure mechanism for the other 3 retrieved IPD implants. Conclusions: Most cases of IPD in DM implants occur after failed closed reduction in the setting of a hip dislocation, suggesting an iatrogenic cause of IPD. No implant-related features could be defined for the remaining cases. Recognizing common failure modes can help with the prevention and treatment of this complication.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002814Dual mobilityIntraprosthetic dislocationTotal hip arthroplasty
spellingShingle Salar Sobhi, BSc, MD
Alan Kop, MSc, PhD
Moreica Pabbruwe, PhD
Christopher W. Jones, BCom, BEng(Hons), MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, FAOrthA
Michael A. Finsterwald, MD, FMH, FRACS, FAOrthA
Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study
Arthroplasty Today
Dual mobility
Intraprosthetic dislocation
Total hip arthroplasty
title Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study
title_full Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study
title_fullStr Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study
title_full_unstemmed Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study
title_short Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study
title_sort intraprosthetic dislocation following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty a retrieval analysis study
topic Dual mobility
Intraprosthetic dislocation
Total hip arthroplasty
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002814
work_keys_str_mv AT salarsobhibscmd intraprostheticdislocationfollowingdualmobilitytotalhiparthroplastyaretrievalanalysisstudy
AT alankopmscphd intraprostheticdislocationfollowingdualmobilitytotalhiparthroplastyaretrievalanalysisstudy
AT moreicapabbruwephd intraprostheticdislocationfollowingdualmobilitytotalhiparthroplastyaretrievalanalysisstudy
AT christopherwjonesbcombenghonsmbbshonsphdfracsfaortha intraprostheticdislocationfollowingdualmobilitytotalhiparthroplastyaretrievalanalysisstudy
AT michaelafinsterwaldmdfmhfracsfaortha intraprostheticdislocationfollowingdualmobilitytotalhiparthroplastyaretrievalanalysisstudy