Honor, Reputation, and Reciprocity
The essay argues that looking at reputation and how one gained a good or bad one is the most productive avenue for understanding how people in early modern Ottoman times understood honor. It explores honor and dishonor as relational processes whereby one person’s gain may spell another’s loss, or th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association pour la Recherche sur le Moyen-Orient
2014-07-01
|
| Series: | European Journal of Turkish Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4850 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850110478048559104 |
|---|---|
| author | Leslie Peirce |
| author_facet | Leslie Peirce |
| author_sort | Leslie Peirce |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The essay argues that looking at reputation and how one gained a good or bad one is the most productive avenue for understanding how people in early modern Ottoman times understood honor. It explores honor and dishonor as relational processes whereby one person’s gain may spell another’s loss, or there may be an attempt to maintain equilibrium among individuals, that is, to recoup damaged reputations for all parties involved in a troubled situation. The role of individuals acting as mediators, witnesses, and guarantors are explored for the ways in which the community figured in the making or breaking of reputation. Sources drawn upon for the essay consist primarily of court cases but also include historical writings and petitions submitted to the sultanate. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-55d14f668ac649c2abb7a276b62dd656 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1773-0546 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-07-01 |
| publisher | Association pour la Recherche sur le Moyen-Orient |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Journal of Turkish Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-55d14f668ac649c2abb7a276b62dd6562025-08-20T02:37:49ZengAssociation pour la Recherche sur le Moyen-OrientEuropean Journal of Turkish Studies1773-05462014-07-011810.4000/ejts.4850Honor, Reputation, and ReciprocityLeslie PeirceThe essay argues that looking at reputation and how one gained a good or bad one is the most productive avenue for understanding how people in early modern Ottoman times understood honor. It explores honor and dishonor as relational processes whereby one person’s gain may spell another’s loss, or there may be an attempt to maintain equilibrium among individuals, that is, to recoup damaged reputations for all parties involved in a troubled situation. The role of individuals acting as mediators, witnesses, and guarantors are explored for the ways in which the community figured in the making or breaking of reputation. Sources drawn upon for the essay consist primarily of court cases but also include historical writings and petitions submitted to the sultanate.https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4850honordishonorreputationreciprocitymediation |
| spellingShingle | Leslie Peirce Honor, Reputation, and Reciprocity European Journal of Turkish Studies honor dishonor reputation reciprocity mediation |
| title | Honor, Reputation, and Reciprocity |
| title_full | Honor, Reputation, and Reciprocity |
| title_fullStr | Honor, Reputation, and Reciprocity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Honor, Reputation, and Reciprocity |
| title_short | Honor, Reputation, and Reciprocity |
| title_sort | honor reputation and reciprocity |
| topic | honor dishonor reputation reciprocity mediation |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4850 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lesliepeirce honorreputationandreciprocity |