STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH

This study combines interlanguage pragmatics and speech act research with computer-mediated communication and examines how native and non-native speakers of English formulate low- and high-imposition requests to faculty. While some research claims that email, due to absence of non-verbal cues, encou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Foreign Language Resource Center 2007-02-01
Series:Language Learning and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/pdf/biesenbachlucas.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849246737294688256
author Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas
author_facet Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas
author_sort Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas
collection DOAJ
description This study combines interlanguage pragmatics and speech act research with computer-mediated communication and examines how native and non-native speakers of English formulate low- and high-imposition requests to faculty. While some research claims that email, due to absence of non-verbal cues, encourages informal language, other research has claimed the opposite. However, email technology also allows writers to plan and revise messages before sending them, thus affording the opportunity to edit not only for grammar and mechanics, but also for pragmatic clarity and politeness.The study examines email requests sent by native and non-native English speaking graduate students to faculty at a major American university over a period of several semesters and applies Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper’s (1989) speech act analysis framework – quantitatively to distinguish levels of directness, i.e. pragmatic clarity; and qualitatively to compare syntactic and lexical politeness devices, the request perspectives, and the specific linguistic request realization patterns preferred by native and non-native speakers. Results show that far more requests are realized through direct strategies as well as hints than conventionally indirect strategies typically found in comparative speech act studies. Politeness conventions in email, a text-only medium with little guidance in the academic institutional hierarchy, appear to be a work in progress, and native speakers demonstrate greater resources in creating e-polite messages to their professors than non-native speakers. A possible avenue for pedagogical intervention with regard to instruction in and acquisition of politeness routines in hierarchically upward email communication is presented.
format Article
id doaj-art-556ab42b03114900aea8036f6ff5fa5f
institution Kabale University
issn 1094-3501
language English
publishDate 2007-02-01
publisher National Foreign Language Resource Center
record_format Article
series Language Learning and Technology
spelling doaj-art-556ab42b03114900aea8036f6ff5fa5f2025-08-20T03:58:25ZengNational Foreign Language Resource CenterLanguage Learning and Technology1094-35012007-02-011125981STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISHSigrun Biesenbach-LucasThis study combines interlanguage pragmatics and speech act research with computer-mediated communication and examines how native and non-native speakers of English formulate low- and high-imposition requests to faculty. While some research claims that email, due to absence of non-verbal cues, encourages informal language, other research has claimed the opposite. However, email technology also allows writers to plan and revise messages before sending them, thus affording the opportunity to edit not only for grammar and mechanics, but also for pragmatic clarity and politeness.The study examines email requests sent by native and non-native English speaking graduate students to faculty at a major American university over a period of several semesters and applies Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper’s (1989) speech act analysis framework – quantitatively to distinguish levels of directness, i.e. pragmatic clarity; and qualitatively to compare syntactic and lexical politeness devices, the request perspectives, and the specific linguistic request realization patterns preferred by native and non-native speakers. Results show that far more requests are realized through direct strategies as well as hints than conventionally indirect strategies typically found in comparative speech act studies. Politeness conventions in email, a text-only medium with little guidance in the academic institutional hierarchy, appear to be a work in progress, and native speakers demonstrate greater resources in creating e-polite messages to their professors than non-native speakers. A possible avenue for pedagogical intervention with regard to instruction in and acquisition of politeness routines in hierarchically upward email communication is presented.http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/pdf/biesenbachlucas.pdfComputer-Mediated CommunicationLiteracySocial Context
spellingShingle Sigrun Biesenbach-Lucas
STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
Language Learning and Technology
Computer-Mediated Communication
Literacy
Social Context
title STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
title_full STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
title_fullStr STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
title_full_unstemmed STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
title_short STUDENTS WRITING EMAILS TO FACULTY: AN EXAMINATION OF E-POLITENESS AMONG NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
title_sort students writing emails to faculty an examination of e politeness among native and non native speakers of english
topic Computer-Mediated Communication
Literacy
Social Context
url http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/pdf/biesenbachlucas.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sigrunbiesenbachlucas studentswritingemailstofacultyanexaminationofepolitenessamongnativeandnonnativespeakersofenglish