Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping
Introduction Implementation Mapping (IM) has increasingly been used for the design and/or selection and tailoring implementation strategies to promote the effective translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. IM is a tool for guiding the systematic, iterative, step-by-step design proc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e088359.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850110854443302912 |
|---|---|
| author | Eunyoung Kang Maria E Fernández Serena Rodriguez Gill ten Hoor Derek W Craig Jennifer Stockton |
| author_facet | Eunyoung Kang Maria E Fernández Serena Rodriguez Gill ten Hoor Derek W Craig Jennifer Stockton |
| author_sort | Eunyoung Kang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction Implementation Mapping (IM) has increasingly been used for the design and/or selection and tailoring implementation strategies to promote the effective translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. IM is a tool for guiding the systematic, iterative, step-by-step design process that helps guide the co-creation of theory-based, evidence-informed implementation strategies. This protocol aims to describe the methods of the planned systematic review that will (1) examine the overall landscape of IM in developing implementation strategies, (2) explore the mechanisms of implementation strategies developed using IM and (3) investigate the use of IM and community engagement in the development of implementation strategies. This review will produce synthesised evidence that will describe how IM has been used in selecting, designing and tailoring implementation strategies, with a focus on implementation mechanism and community engagement.Methods and analysis We will include peer-reviewed original English articles that describe the use of Implementation Mapping or Intervention Mapping to design implementation strategies. We will search Medline Ovid, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science using the following terms: ‘Implementation Mapping’ and ‘Intervention Mapping’. At least two reviewers will independently screen the records to examine the eligibility. After several rounds of consistency testing of data extraction among at least two reviewers and confirming the consistent coding among the reviewer team, one coder will proceed with the data extraction. In case of uncertainty, we will reach a consensus through interactive reviewers’ meetings and in consultation with a senior author. We examined the risk of bias in individual studies using the quality assessment tool developed by Hawker et al in 2002. We will synthesise and present the data by each research aim.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was not required. Findings will be shared via peer-reviewed journals, and data from the included studies will be made openly accessible. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5550518863354f07b05af007e8a3d8bd |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-5550518863354f07b05af007e8a3d8bd2025-08-20T02:37:46ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-11-01141110.1136/bmjopen-2024-088359Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mappingEunyoung Kang0Maria E Fernández1Serena Rodriguez2Gill ten Hoor3Derek W Craig4Jennifer Stockton5UTHealth Institute for Implementation Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USAUTHealth Institute for Implementation Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USAUTHealth Institute for Implementation Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USADepartment of Work & Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsUTHealth Institute for Implementation Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USAThe Texas Medical Center Library, Houston, Texas, USAIntroduction Implementation Mapping (IM) has increasingly been used for the design and/or selection and tailoring implementation strategies to promote the effective translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. IM is a tool for guiding the systematic, iterative, step-by-step design process that helps guide the co-creation of theory-based, evidence-informed implementation strategies. This protocol aims to describe the methods of the planned systematic review that will (1) examine the overall landscape of IM in developing implementation strategies, (2) explore the mechanisms of implementation strategies developed using IM and (3) investigate the use of IM and community engagement in the development of implementation strategies. This review will produce synthesised evidence that will describe how IM has been used in selecting, designing and tailoring implementation strategies, with a focus on implementation mechanism and community engagement.Methods and analysis We will include peer-reviewed original English articles that describe the use of Implementation Mapping or Intervention Mapping to design implementation strategies. We will search Medline Ovid, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science using the following terms: ‘Implementation Mapping’ and ‘Intervention Mapping’. At least two reviewers will independently screen the records to examine the eligibility. After several rounds of consistency testing of data extraction among at least two reviewers and confirming the consistent coding among the reviewer team, one coder will proceed with the data extraction. In case of uncertainty, we will reach a consensus through interactive reviewers’ meetings and in consultation with a senior author. We examined the risk of bias in individual studies using the quality assessment tool developed by Hawker et al in 2002. We will synthesise and present the data by each research aim.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was not required. Findings will be shared via peer-reviewed journals, and data from the included studies will be made openly accessible.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e088359.full |
| spellingShingle | Eunyoung Kang Maria E Fernández Serena Rodriguez Gill ten Hoor Derek W Craig Jennifer Stockton Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping BMJ Open |
| title | Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping |
| title_full | Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping |
| title_fullStr | Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping |
| title_full_unstemmed | Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping |
| title_short | Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping |
| title_sort | context mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e088359.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eunyoungkang contextmechanismsandcommunityengagementinimplementationstrategiesasystematicreviewprotocolofimplementationstrategiesdesignedusingimplementationmapping AT mariaefernandez contextmechanismsandcommunityengagementinimplementationstrategiesasystematicreviewprotocolofimplementationstrategiesdesignedusingimplementationmapping AT serenarodriguez contextmechanismsandcommunityengagementinimplementationstrategiesasystematicreviewprotocolofimplementationstrategiesdesignedusingimplementationmapping AT gilltenhoor contextmechanismsandcommunityengagementinimplementationstrategiesasystematicreviewprotocolofimplementationstrategiesdesignedusingimplementationmapping AT derekwcraig contextmechanismsandcommunityengagementinimplementationstrategiesasystematicreviewprotocolofimplementationstrategiesdesignedusingimplementationmapping AT jenniferstockton contextmechanismsandcommunityengagementinimplementationstrategiesasystematicreviewprotocolofimplementationstrategiesdesignedusingimplementationmapping |