Understanding opposition: arguments for and against a meat tax in Sweden and their effect on policy attitudes
Meat taxes could reduce emissions and improve health but risks facing opposition due to concerns about fairness, effectiveness, and autonomy. While policy-specific beliefs influence attitudes, less is known about how specific arguments in the public discourse shape these beliefs and policy acceptabi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | E Ejelöv, J Larsson, S Matti, J Nässén |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Research: Food Systems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/2976-601X/adf4ec |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Acceptability of meat tax and subsidy removal by meat eaters: insights from five European countries
by: Diana Kmeťková, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Three Approaches to Criticisms and Support in Evaluation of Arguments
by: E. N. Lisanyuk
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Faith and Reality: Marx’s Understanding of an Ontological Argument in Reference to Kant
by: Chuantao Feng, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Valuating the Effect of Toulmin Argumentation Model on Critical Thinking and Epistemological Beliefs in Online Education
by: Salih GÜLEN, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments
by: Scott Aikin, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01)