Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysis

Abstract Objectives Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large tumors is spreading worldwide. Gastric cancer (GC) sometimes occurs after colorectal ESD. However, its status including frequency and risk factors have not been examined well. In this study, we analyzed the detailed stat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuri Tomita, Naohisa Yoshida, Hideki Ishikawa, Takahiro Otani, Reo Kobayashi, Hikaru Hashimoto, Ryohei Hirose, Osamu Dohi, Ken Inoue, Yukiko Morinaga, Yoshito Itoh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:DEN Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70042
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850177575173750784
author Yuri Tomita
Naohisa Yoshida
Hideki Ishikawa
Takahiro Otani
Reo Kobayashi
Hikaru Hashimoto
Ryohei Hirose
Osamu Dohi
Ken Inoue
Yukiko Morinaga
Yoshito Itoh
author_facet Yuri Tomita
Naohisa Yoshida
Hideki Ishikawa
Takahiro Otani
Reo Kobayashi
Hikaru Hashimoto
Ryohei Hirose
Osamu Dohi
Ken Inoue
Yukiko Morinaga
Yoshito Itoh
author_sort Yuri Tomita
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large tumors is spreading worldwide. Gastric cancer (GC) sometimes occurs after colorectal ESD. However, its status including frequency and risk factors have not been examined well. In this study, we analyzed the detailed status of GC after colorectal ESD. Methods This was a single‐center retrospective study. Patients receiving colorectal ESD between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed. All patients were recommended to receive esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for screening. Finally, 436 patients receiving EGD, who underwent colorectal ESD for lesions of ≥20 mm were analyzed. The primary outcome was the GC rate after colorectal ESD, including intramucosal cancer. As a control, we compared it to the GC rate in matched Japanese national cancer registry data. The secondary outcome was risk factors for developing GC. Results The mean age was 66.9 ± 10.6 and 55.3% were males. The GC rate was 5.96% (26/436) with a median observation period of 27 months. It was significantly higher than the mean GC rate in the diagnosed age calculated with the cancer registry (0.26%, observed value/expected value ratio [95% confidence interval]: 22.20 [14.50–32.53], p < 0.01). The comparison between cases with and without GC showed that significant risk factors were male (p = 0.02) and smokers (p < 0.01) and their GC rates were 8.3% and 10.9%. Also, in the limited cases, Helicobacter pylori infection (past and present) and atrophic gastritis were significant and their GC rates were 11.1% and 11.6%. Conclusion The GC rate was high after resecting colorectal tumors of ≥20 mm, suggesting the necessity of EGD.
format Article
id doaj-art-54eb6f3750e8445a8acd4cabb47ea2d6
institution OA Journals
issn 2692-4609
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series DEN Open
spelling doaj-art-54eb6f3750e8445a8acd4cabb47ea2d62025-08-20T02:18:56ZengWileyDEN Open2692-46092025-04-0151n/an/a10.1002/deo2.70042Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysisYuri Tomita0Naohisa Yoshida1Hideki Ishikawa2Takahiro Otani3Reo Kobayashi4Hikaru Hashimoto5Ryohei Hirose6Osamu Dohi7Ken Inoue8Yukiko Morinaga9Yoshito Itoh10Department of Gastroenterology Koseikai Takeda Hospital Kyoto JapanDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanDepartment of Molecular‐Targeting Prevention Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanDepartment of Public Health Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Aichi JapanDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology Osaka General Hospital of West Japan Railway Company Osaka JapanDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanDepartment of Surgical Pathology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto JapanAbstract Objectives Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large tumors is spreading worldwide. Gastric cancer (GC) sometimes occurs after colorectal ESD. However, its status including frequency and risk factors have not been examined well. In this study, we analyzed the detailed status of GC after colorectal ESD. Methods This was a single‐center retrospective study. Patients receiving colorectal ESD between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed. All patients were recommended to receive esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for screening. Finally, 436 patients receiving EGD, who underwent colorectal ESD for lesions of ≥20 mm were analyzed. The primary outcome was the GC rate after colorectal ESD, including intramucosal cancer. As a control, we compared it to the GC rate in matched Japanese national cancer registry data. The secondary outcome was risk factors for developing GC. Results The mean age was 66.9 ± 10.6 and 55.3% were males. The GC rate was 5.96% (26/436) with a median observation period of 27 months. It was significantly higher than the mean GC rate in the diagnosed age calculated with the cancer registry (0.26%, observed value/expected value ratio [95% confidence interval]: 22.20 [14.50–32.53], p < 0.01). The comparison between cases with and without GC showed that significant risk factors were male (p = 0.02) and smokers (p < 0.01) and their GC rates were 8.3% and 10.9%. Also, in the limited cases, Helicobacter pylori infection (past and present) and atrophic gastritis were significant and their GC rates were 11.1% and 11.6%. Conclusion The GC rate was high after resecting colorectal tumors of ≥20 mm, suggesting the necessity of EGD.https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70042colorectal neoplasmscolonoscopyendoscopic submucosal dissectionesophagogastroduodenoscopygastric cancer
spellingShingle Yuri Tomita
Naohisa Yoshida
Hideki Ishikawa
Takahiro Otani
Reo Kobayashi
Hikaru Hashimoto
Ryohei Hirose
Osamu Dohi
Ken Inoue
Yukiko Morinaga
Yoshito Itoh
Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysis
DEN Open
colorectal neoplasms
colonoscopy
endoscopic submucosal dissection
esophagogastroduodenoscopy
gastric cancer
title Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysis
title_full Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysis
title_short Prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm: A retrospective analysis
title_sort prevalence of gastric cancer following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions more than 20 mm a retrospective analysis
topic colorectal neoplasms
colonoscopy
endoscopic submucosal dissection
esophagogastroduodenoscopy
gastric cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70042
work_keys_str_mv AT yuritomita prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT naohisayoshida prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hidekiishikawa prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT takahirootani prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT reokobayashi prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hikaruhashimoto prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT ryoheihirose prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT osamudohi prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT keninoue prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yukikomorinaga prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yoshitoitoh prevalenceofgastriccancerfollowingcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlesionsmorethan20mmaretrospectiveanalysis