18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma

Abstract The prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden parameters obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was evaluated in this retrospective national multicenter study of patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma (PUM) and compared to the largest diameter of the largest metastatic lesion (LDL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tine Gadegaard Hindso, Torben Martinussen, Camilla Wium Bjerrum, Sune Høgild Keller, Annika Loft, Mette Bagger Sjøl, Kristoffer Nissen, Carsten Faber, Marco Donia, Inge Marie Svane, Eva Ellebaek, Steffen Heegaard, Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Karine Madsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88625-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862478370504704
author Tine Gadegaard Hindso
Torben Martinussen
Camilla Wium Bjerrum
Sune Høgild Keller
Annika Loft
Mette Bagger Sjøl
Kristoffer Nissen
Carsten Faber
Marco Donia
Inge Marie Svane
Eva Ellebaek
Steffen Heegaard
Jens Folke Kiilgaard
Karine Madsen
author_facet Tine Gadegaard Hindso
Torben Martinussen
Camilla Wium Bjerrum
Sune Høgild Keller
Annika Loft
Mette Bagger Sjøl
Kristoffer Nissen
Carsten Faber
Marco Donia
Inge Marie Svane
Eva Ellebaek
Steffen Heegaard
Jens Folke Kiilgaard
Karine Madsen
author_sort Tine Gadegaard Hindso
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden parameters obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was evaluated in this retrospective national multicenter study of patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma (PUM) and compared to the largest diameter of the largest metastatic lesion (LDLM) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. The Maximal Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax), Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) were obtained in 106 patients. Higher values of SUVmax (p = 0.007, log-rank), MTV (p < 0.001, log-rank), and TLG (p < 0.001, long-rank) were associated with shorter survival. The three parameters were also independent predictors in the multivariate Cox model, while the AJCC staging turned insignificant. Time-dependent positive predictive value (PPV) analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves showed that MTV (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.78), TLG (AUC = 0.78), and LDLM (AUC = 0.76) were good predictors of 1-year survival. For the subset of 97 patients with liver metastases, the corresponding regional measurements in the liver tended to be even better predictors. In conclusion, MTV and TLG were found to be better predictors of survival in metastatic PUM than the AJCC staging system, but when LDLM was used as a continuous variable it showed an equally good prediction of 1-year survival.
format Article
id doaj-art-5483e8d7b8d340719f74dc5e1df6c33b
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-5483e8d7b8d340719f74dc5e1df6c33b2025-02-09T12:32:26ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-02-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-88625-w18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanomaTine Gadegaard Hindso0Torben Martinussen1Camilla Wium Bjerrum2Sune Høgild Keller3Annika Loft4Mette Bagger Sjøl5Kristoffer Nissen6Carsten Faber7Marco Donia8Inge Marie Svane9Eva Ellebaek10Steffen Heegaard11Jens Folke Kiilgaard12Karine Madsen13Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Biostatistics, University of CopenhagenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and GentofteDepartment of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and GentofteDepartment of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and GentofteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – RigshospitaletAbstract The prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden parameters obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was evaluated in this retrospective national multicenter study of patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma (PUM) and compared to the largest diameter of the largest metastatic lesion (LDLM) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. The Maximal Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax), Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) were obtained in 106 patients. Higher values of SUVmax (p = 0.007, log-rank), MTV (p < 0.001, log-rank), and TLG (p < 0.001, long-rank) were associated with shorter survival. The three parameters were also independent predictors in the multivariate Cox model, while the AJCC staging turned insignificant. Time-dependent positive predictive value (PPV) analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves showed that MTV (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.78), TLG (AUC = 0.78), and LDLM (AUC = 0.76) were good predictors of 1-year survival. For the subset of 97 patients with liver metastases, the corresponding regional measurements in the liver tended to be even better predictors. In conclusion, MTV and TLG were found to be better predictors of survival in metastatic PUM than the AJCC staging system, but when LDLM was used as a continuous variable it showed an equally good prediction of 1-year survival.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88625-wUveal melanomaFDG PETMetabolic tumor burdenMetabolic tumor volume (MTV)Total lesion glycolysis (TLG)Survival
spellingShingle Tine Gadegaard Hindso
Torben Martinussen
Camilla Wium Bjerrum
Sune Høgild Keller
Annika Loft
Mette Bagger Sjøl
Kristoffer Nissen
Carsten Faber
Marco Donia
Inge Marie Svane
Eva Ellebaek
Steffen Heegaard
Jens Folke Kiilgaard
Karine Madsen
18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma
Scientific Reports
Uveal melanoma
FDG PET
Metabolic tumor burden
Metabolic tumor volume (MTV)
Total lesion glycolysis (TLG)
Survival
title 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma
title_full 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma
title_fullStr 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma
title_full_unstemmed 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma
title_short 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma
title_sort 18f fdg pet ct assessment of metabolic tumor burden predicts survival in patients with metastatic posterior uveal melanoma
topic Uveal melanoma
FDG PET
Metabolic tumor burden
Metabolic tumor volume (MTV)
Total lesion glycolysis (TLG)
Survival
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88625-w
work_keys_str_mv AT tinegadegaardhindso 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT torbenmartinussen 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT camillawiumbjerrum 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT sunehøgildkeller 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT annikaloft 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT mettebaggersjøl 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT kristoffernissen 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT carstenfaber 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT marcodonia 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT ingemariesvane 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT evaellebaek 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT steffenheegaard 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT jensfolkekiilgaard 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma
AT karinemadsen 18ffdgpetctassessmentofmetabolictumorburdenpredictssurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticposterioruvealmelanoma