Variability and Reliability of the Axivity AX6 Accelerometer in Technical and Human Motion Conditions
This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-instrument variability and reliability of the Axivity AX6 accelerometer under controlled technical conditions and human motion scenarios. In the first experiment, 12 accelerometers were affixed to a vibration platform and tested at four frequencies (...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/8/2480 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-instrument variability and reliability of the Axivity AX6 accelerometer under controlled technical conditions and human motion scenarios. In the first experiment, 12 accelerometers were affixed to a vibration platform and tested at four frequencies (2.2, 3.2, 6.5, and 9.4 Hz) along three axes to assess frequency- and axis-dependent variability. In the second experiment, four AX6 accelerometers were simultaneously placed on a subject’s wrist and tested under four human motion conditions (walking at 4 km·h<sup>−1</sup> and 6 km·h<sup>−1</sup> and running at 8 km·h<sup>−1</sup> and 10 km·h<sup>−1</sup>). Results demonstrated low intra- and inter-instrument variability (CVintra: 3.3–4.5%; CVinter: 6.3–7.7%) with high reliability (ICC = 0.98). Similar results were observed in human motion conditions (CVintra: 5.3–8.8%; CVinter: 7.1–10.4%), with ICC values of 0.98 for combined devices, and 0.99 for each device individually. Despite statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between devices in human motion all conditions, the variations remained below the minimal clinically significant difference threshold. These findings indicate that under technical conditions on a vibrating platform, and within the range of typical human accelerations, the Axivity AX6 is a reliable tool for measuring accelerations representative of physical activity. However, further research is necessary to validate its performance under free-living conditions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1424-8220 |