A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
A systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832568357115658240 |
---|---|
author | Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González |
author_facet | Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González |
author_sort | Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND caffeine” were examined into titles, abstracts, and keywords. A brief bibliometric analysis was performed with emphasis on the type of publication and of most cited articles. Materials for the removal of caffeine were classified according to the type of material into three main groups: organic, inorganic, and composites, each of them subdivided into different subgroups consistent with their origin or production. Tables resume for each subgroup of adsorbents the key information: specific surface area, dose, pH, maximum adsorption capacity, and isotherm models for the removal of caffeine. The highest adsorption capacities were achieved by organic adsorbents, specifically those with granular activated carbon (1961.3 mg/g) and grape stalk activated carbon (916.7 mg/g). Phenyl-phosphate-based porous organic polymer (301 mg/g), natural sandy loam sediment (221.2 mg/g), composites of MCM-48 encapsulated graphene oxide (153.8 mg/g), and organically modified clay (143.7 mg/g) showed adsorption capacities lower than those of activated carbons. In some activated carbons, a relation between the specific surface area (SSA) and the maximum adsorption capacity (Qmax) was found. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-54627847f5fe4ae7b0e69bc530c50865 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2356-6140 1537-744X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | The Scientific World Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-54627847f5fe4ae7b0e69bc530c508652025-02-03T00:59:12ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/99989249998924A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of AdsorbentsJavier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo0Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla1Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González2Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, km 7 vía al Aeropuerto, AA 127, Manizales, ColombiaDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, km 7 vía al Aeropuerto, AA 127, Manizales, ColombiaDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, km 7 vía al Aeropuerto, AA 127, Manizales, ColombiaA systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND caffeine” were examined into titles, abstracts, and keywords. A brief bibliometric analysis was performed with emphasis on the type of publication and of most cited articles. Materials for the removal of caffeine were classified according to the type of material into three main groups: organic, inorganic, and composites, each of them subdivided into different subgroups consistent with their origin or production. Tables resume for each subgroup of adsorbents the key information: specific surface area, dose, pH, maximum adsorption capacity, and isotherm models for the removal of caffeine. The highest adsorption capacities were achieved by organic adsorbents, specifically those with granular activated carbon (1961.3 mg/g) and grape stalk activated carbon (916.7 mg/g). Phenyl-phosphate-based porous organic polymer (301 mg/g), natural sandy loam sediment (221.2 mg/g), composites of MCM-48 encapsulated graphene oxide (153.8 mg/g), and organically modified clay (143.7 mg/g) showed adsorption capacities lower than those of activated carbons. In some activated carbons, a relation between the specific surface area (SSA) and the maximum adsorption capacity (Qmax) was found.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924 |
spellingShingle | Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents The Scientific World Journal |
title | A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents |
title_full | A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents |
title_fullStr | A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents |
title_short | A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents |
title_sort | review of caffeine adsorption studies onto various types of adsorbents |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javierandresquinterojaramillo areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents AT javierignaciocarreromantilla areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents AT nancyrociosanabriagonzalez areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents AT javierandresquinterojaramillo reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents AT javierignaciocarreromantilla reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents AT nancyrociosanabriagonzalez reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents |