OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICS

Purpose. The author will show that metaphysical concepts and the concepts of empirical sciences derive from experience. The only difference is that metaphysical concepts derive from unusual experience, i.e. out-of-body experience, while empirical sciences – from usual one. The example set metaphysic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I. V. Karivets
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies 2016-12-01
Series:Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/87054/83258
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568771689054208
author I. V. Karivets
author_facet I. V. Karivets
author_sort I. V. Karivets
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The author will show that metaphysical concepts and the concepts of empirical sciences derive from experience. The only difference is that metaphysical concepts derive from unusual experience, i.e. out-of-body experience, while empirical sciences – from usual one. The example set metaphysical concept of pure being. Methodology. In order to obtain this goal the author uses two methods. The first one is comparative method. With the help of this method the stories of men who experienced clinical death and returned to life are compared with the famous philosophers’ metaphysical statements (Plato, Descartes, and Bonaventura). The second one is transpersonal method. It helps to study the peculiarities of the extraordinary experience in the state of clinical death or mystical ecstasy. Such experience lies in experience of transcendence, pure being as light, ultimate awareness of truth, which are identical to the metaphysical statements of philosophers and mystics. These ultimate experiences belong to different people, who lived and grown in different cultures, but nevertheless metaphysical statements of philosophers or mystics and statements of the ordinary people who experienced clinical death are the same. Therefore we can say that out-of-body experience is transpersonal. Originality. Metaphysics is neither speculative nor withdrawn from experience of a human being sphere. It arises from out-of-body experience while empirical sciences – from usual experience. Therefore, metaphysical concepts, in particular, pure being, are empirical, because they are based also on (extraordinary) experience. In general, metaphysics becomes possible on the basis of out-of-body experience. Conclusions. In this article the author argues that the concepts of metaphysics are not a priori because they originate from out-of-body experience that is from the experience of the distinction between body and soul or body and mind. As a result of such experience appear, for instance, Plato’s metaphysics, Descartes’ metaphysics, and the Christian mysticism of Bonaventure, which theoretical constructs are deriving from experience of pure being (light). In this context metaphysics is seen as the path of gradual separation of a human being from his or her physical body, i.e. “the art of dying” (Plato). Therefore, the author proves that there are no a priori concepts. All concepts are aposteriori, in empirical sciences and in metaphysics as well. We simply talk about two different experiences: usual and unusual experience. The author also argues that there is direct connection between out of body experience and metaphysics, mystics. In the case of out-of-body experience, the temporary death of a human being is the cause of his/her change in perception of himself/herself and the world; it is the cause of metaphysical knowledge.
format Article
id doaj-art-5436dd07179f44549ca9eae14b36291e
institution Kabale University
issn 2227-7242
language English
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies
record_format Article
series Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
spelling doaj-art-5436dd07179f44549ca9eae14b36291e2025-02-03T00:37:10ZengUkrainian State University of Science and TechnologiesAntropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'2227-72422016-12-0101071610.15802/ampr.v0i10.8705482016OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICSI. V. Karivets0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-2226Lviv National Polytechnic University UkrainePurpose. The author will show that metaphysical concepts and the concepts of empirical sciences derive from experience. The only difference is that metaphysical concepts derive from unusual experience, i.e. out-of-body experience, while empirical sciences – from usual one. The example set metaphysical concept of pure being. Methodology. In order to obtain this goal the author uses two methods. The first one is comparative method. With the help of this method the stories of men who experienced clinical death and returned to life are compared with the famous philosophers’ metaphysical statements (Plato, Descartes, and Bonaventura). The second one is transpersonal method. It helps to study the peculiarities of the extraordinary experience in the state of clinical death or mystical ecstasy. Such experience lies in experience of transcendence, pure being as light, ultimate awareness of truth, which are identical to the metaphysical statements of philosophers and mystics. These ultimate experiences belong to different people, who lived and grown in different cultures, but nevertheless metaphysical statements of philosophers or mystics and statements of the ordinary people who experienced clinical death are the same. Therefore we can say that out-of-body experience is transpersonal. Originality. Metaphysics is neither speculative nor withdrawn from experience of a human being sphere. It arises from out-of-body experience while empirical sciences – from usual experience. Therefore, metaphysical concepts, in particular, pure being, are empirical, because they are based also on (extraordinary) experience. In general, metaphysics becomes possible on the basis of out-of-body experience. Conclusions. In this article the author argues that the concepts of metaphysics are not a priori because they originate from out-of-body experience that is from the experience of the distinction between body and soul or body and mind. As a result of such experience appear, for instance, Plato’s metaphysics, Descartes’ metaphysics, and the Christian mysticism of Bonaventure, which theoretical constructs are deriving from experience of pure being (light). In this context metaphysics is seen as the path of gradual separation of a human being from his or her physical body, i.e. “the art of dying” (Plato). Therefore, the author proves that there are no a priori concepts. All concepts are aposteriori, in empirical sciences and in metaphysics as well. We simply talk about two different experiences: usual and unusual experience. The author also argues that there is direct connection between out of body experience and metaphysics, mystics. In the case of out-of-body experience, the temporary death of a human being is the cause of his/her change in perception of himself/herself and the world; it is the cause of metaphysical knowledge.http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/87054/83258out-of-body experiencemetaphysicspure beinglightdyingclinical deathecstasycontemplation
spellingShingle I. V. Karivets
OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICS
Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
out-of-body experience
metaphysics
pure being
light
dying
clinical death
ecstasy
contemplation
title OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICS
title_full OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICS
title_fullStr OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICS
title_full_unstemmed OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICS
title_short OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE, PURE BEING AND METAPHYSICS
title_sort out of body experience pure being and metaphysics
topic out-of-body experience
metaphysics
pure being
light
dying
clinical death
ecstasy
contemplation
url http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/87054/83258
work_keys_str_mv AT ivkarivets outofbodyexperiencepurebeingandmetaphysics