Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy

Objectives To study the cost-effectiveness of additional intra-arterial thrombolysis (IA lysis) after successful recanalization with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).Design A cost-effectiveness model was used to estimate both direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in six...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Albert J Yoo, Charles B L M Majoie, Johannes Kaesmacher, Arturo Renú, Angel Chamorro, Anne-Laure Bocquet, Thomas Barthe, Bart Jeroen Emmer, Victor Durieux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-08-01
Series:BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies
Online Access:https://sit.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000372.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849771054060273664
author Albert J Yoo
Charles B L M Majoie
Johannes Kaesmacher
Arturo Renú
Angel Chamorro
Anne-Laure Bocquet
Thomas Barthe
Bart Jeroen Emmer
Victor Durieux
author_facet Albert J Yoo
Charles B L M Majoie
Johannes Kaesmacher
Arturo Renú
Angel Chamorro
Anne-Laure Bocquet
Thomas Barthe
Bart Jeroen Emmer
Victor Durieux
author_sort Albert J Yoo
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To study the cost-effectiveness of additional intra-arterial thrombolysis (IA lysis) after successful recanalization with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).Design A cost-effectiveness model was used to estimate both direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in six European countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany) and the USA.Setting The model was based on published data from those countries on health economics.Participants Cost of procedure as well as acute, mid-term and long-term care costs were estimated based on expected modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores as reported in the Chemical Optimization of Cerebral Embolectomy (CHOICE) trial, which reported improved neurological outcomes after adjunctive IA lysis following EVT.Main outcome measures QALYs in the model were calculated by mapping mRS outcomes from the CHOICE trial to EQ-5D utility values from a validated poststroke cohort, projecting these over a 20-year lifetime horizon with 3% annual discounting, assuming health state transitions only after recurrent stroke (always to a worse mRS) and no recurrent stroke risk in the first 90 days.Results IA lysis was found to be a cost-effective option in seven different countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the USA). We found an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranging from US$−2350 per QALY gained in Germany to US$9628 per QALY gained in the USA. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed 90% acceptability of IA lysis at the willingness to pay varying between US$10 000 and US$45 000 depending on the country.Conclusions IA lysis after successful EVT was cost-efficient after reperfusion in the seven countries studied. The early termination, small sample and limited power of the CHOICE trial reduce generalizability of our results. Larger trials are needed to confirm cost-effectiveness of IA lysis after successful EVT.
format Article
id doaj-art-53faa9ebf52a40bdbed216fff4b19122
institution DOAJ
issn 2631-4940
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies
spelling doaj-art-53faa9ebf52a40bdbed216fff4b191222025-08-20T03:02:45ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies2631-49402025-08-017110.1136/bmjsit-2024-000372Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomyAlbert J Yoo0Charles B L M Majoie1Johannes Kaesmacher2Arturo Renú3Angel Chamorro4Anne-Laure Bocquet5Thomas Barthe6Bart Jeroen Emmer7Victor Durieux818 Division of Neurointervention, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas, Texas, USARadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands20 Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandInstitut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, SpainUniversidad de Barcelona Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de La Salud, Barcelona, Spain3@Stryker, Strokenomics, Paris, France3@Stryker, Strokenomics, Paris, FranceRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsStrokEnomics, Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California, USAObjectives To study the cost-effectiveness of additional intra-arterial thrombolysis (IA lysis) after successful recanalization with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).Design A cost-effectiveness model was used to estimate both direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in six European countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany) and the USA.Setting The model was based on published data from those countries on health economics.Participants Cost of procedure as well as acute, mid-term and long-term care costs were estimated based on expected modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores as reported in the Chemical Optimization of Cerebral Embolectomy (CHOICE) trial, which reported improved neurological outcomes after adjunctive IA lysis following EVT.Main outcome measures QALYs in the model were calculated by mapping mRS outcomes from the CHOICE trial to EQ-5D utility values from a validated poststroke cohort, projecting these over a 20-year lifetime horizon with 3% annual discounting, assuming health state transitions only after recurrent stroke (always to a worse mRS) and no recurrent stroke risk in the first 90 days.Results IA lysis was found to be a cost-effective option in seven different countries (Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the USA). We found an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranging from US$−2350 per QALY gained in Germany to US$9628 per QALY gained in the USA. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed 90% acceptability of IA lysis at the willingness to pay varying between US$10 000 and US$45 000 depending on the country.Conclusions IA lysis after successful EVT was cost-efficient after reperfusion in the seven countries studied. The early termination, small sample and limited power of the CHOICE trial reduce generalizability of our results. Larger trials are needed to confirm cost-effectiveness of IA lysis after successful EVT.https://sit.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000372.full
spellingShingle Albert J Yoo
Charles B L M Majoie
Johannes Kaesmacher
Arturo Renú
Angel Chamorro
Anne-Laure Bocquet
Thomas Barthe
Bart Jeroen Emmer
Victor Durieux
Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies
title Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy
title_full Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy
title_short Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy
title_sort cost effectiveness of intra arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy
url https://sit.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000372.full
work_keys_str_mv AT albertjyoo costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT charlesblmmajoie costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT johanneskaesmacher costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT arturorenu costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT angelchamorro costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT annelaurebocquet costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT thomasbarthe costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT bartjeroenemmer costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy
AT victordurieux costeffectivenessofintraarterialthrombolysisaftersuccessfulthrombectomy