Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design Sciences
Consensus on the impact of design on perfor-mance can be said to be evident at all three levels of decision-making in organizations: strategic, tac-tical, operational (Brunswicker et al. 2019; Gemser & Leenders 2001). This impact broadly assumes the following forms: • Design impact for stra...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Jap Sam Books
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Cubic Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cubicjournal.org/index.php/cubic/article/view/60 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825199948752224256 |
|---|---|
| author | Jörn Bühring Brigitte Borja de Mozota Patricia A. Moore |
| author_facet | Jörn Bühring Brigitte Borja de Mozota Patricia A. Moore |
| author_sort | Jörn Bühring |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Consensus on the impact of design on perfor-mance can be said to be evident at all three levels of decision-making in organizations: strategic, tac-tical, operational (Brunswicker et al. 2019; Gemser & Leenders 2001). This impact broadly assumes the following forms:
• Design impact for strategy in action and customer experience
• Design impact for business strategy, process, innovation, and performance
• Design impact for cultural change and organization transformation
Despite these revelations, precious little guidance is found in the way of forming a holistic view of the why of design science, core capabilities, theo-ries, and methods in business economics and the ultimate pertinence of the design function in any given organization. Similarly, the how, which would outline the ways in which these capacities could be built and coordinated towards the support of stra-tegic design and forward-looking decision-making processes is at best assumed, yet very rarely articulated.
This issue includes both the papers from academia and professionals we received through our Call, as well as the results of a complementary survey con-ducted by the editors with Chief Design Officers. Our editorial foreword uses the model (Figure 1) as the framework for a synthesis, linking strategy in design science and strategy in business science:
Part I - The vertical axis of Strategy from Vision to Mission through Value: design strategy versus cor-porate strategy, and business economics in design-driven organizations.
Part II - The horizontal axis of Strategic Manage-ment and the Strategic design decision path. From design leadership and strategic positioning to busi-ness strategy and design management to strategy in action and design.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-53f947d8eb5c4674b964b235070ce88f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2589-7101 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | Jap Sam Books |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cubic Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-53f947d8eb5c4674b964b235070ce88f2025-02-07T22:39:10ZengJap Sam BooksCubic Journal2589-71012023-08-0166Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design SciencesJörn Bühring0Brigitte Borja de Mozota1Patricia A. Moore2Hong Kong Polytechnic University Université du Québec à Montréal MooreDesign Associates Consensus on the impact of design on perfor-mance can be said to be evident at all three levels of decision-making in organizations: strategic, tac-tical, operational (Brunswicker et al. 2019; Gemser & Leenders 2001). This impact broadly assumes the following forms: • Design impact for strategy in action and customer experience • Design impact for business strategy, process, innovation, and performance • Design impact for cultural change and organization transformation Despite these revelations, precious little guidance is found in the way of forming a holistic view of the why of design science, core capabilities, theo-ries, and methods in business economics and the ultimate pertinence of the design function in any given organization. Similarly, the how, which would outline the ways in which these capacities could be built and coordinated towards the support of stra-tegic design and forward-looking decision-making processes is at best assumed, yet very rarely articulated. This issue includes both the papers from academia and professionals we received through our Call, as well as the results of a complementary survey con-ducted by the editors with Chief Design Officers. Our editorial foreword uses the model (Figure 1) as the framework for a synthesis, linking strategy in design science and strategy in business science: Part I - The vertical axis of Strategy from Vision to Mission through Value: design strategy versus cor-porate strategy, and business economics in design-driven organizations. Part II - The horizontal axis of Strategic Manage-ment and the Strategic design decision path. From design leadership and strategic positioning to busi-ness strategy and design management to strategy in action and design. https://cubicjournal.org/index.php/cubic/article/view/60design strategystrategic designcapability buildingdesign valuedesign performance |
| spellingShingle | Jörn Bühring Brigitte Borja de Mozota Patricia A. Moore Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design Sciences Cubic Journal design strategy strategic design capability building design value design performance |
| title | Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design Sciences |
| title_full | Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design Sciences |
| title_fullStr | Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design Sciences |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design Sciences |
| title_short | Bridging Strategy from Both Business Economics and Design Sciences |
| title_sort | bridging strategy from both business economics and design sciences |
| topic | design strategy strategic design capability building design value design performance |
| url | https://cubicjournal.org/index.php/cubic/article/view/60 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jornbuhring bridgingstrategyfrombothbusinesseconomicsanddesignsciences AT brigitteborjademozota bridgingstrategyfrombothbusinesseconomicsanddesignsciences AT patriciaamoore bridgingstrategyfrombothbusinesseconomicsanddesignsciences |