Who decides what is read on Goodreads? Uncovering sponsorship and its implications for scholarly Research
Attracted by the promise of a broader and more egalitarian sample of readers than published book reviews provide, researchers are increasingly scraping social reviewing platforms like Goodreads for data about readers’ behavior. Yet, treating online book reviews as direct proxies for readers and book...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Yuerong Hu, Jana Diesner, Ted Underwood, Zoe LeBlanc, Glen Layne-Worthey, John Stephen Downie |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-09-01
|
| Series: | Big Data & Society |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251359229 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Towards nuanced and critical data analysis: an exploratory investigation into complexities of Goodreads reviews for children's books
by: Yuerong Hu, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Goodreads i savjetovanje čitatelja na primjeru korisnika iz Hrvatske
by: Mirko Duić, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Missing Data, Speculative Reading
by: Rebecca Sutton Koeser, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01) -
Attitudinal Resources of the "Yellowface" (2023) Reviews on Goodreads: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Study
by: Zakiya Rodliya, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Deciding for Therapy: Deciding for Peace of Mind
by: Janyne Sattler
Published: (2022-03-01)