Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron Tankmixes
Four field trials were conducted over a three-year period (2011–2013) in southwestern Ontario to evaluate the level of weed control provided by various halosulfuron tankmixes applied preplant incorporated (PPI) in white bean. Trifluralin, s-metolachlor, halosulfuron, and imazethapyr applied alone or...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Agriculture |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/391634 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832554780361228288 |
|---|---|
| author | Nader Soltani Robert E. Nurse Christy Shropshire Peter H. Sikkema |
| author_facet | Nader Soltani Robert E. Nurse Christy Shropshire Peter H. Sikkema |
| author_sort | Nader Soltani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Four field trials were conducted over a three-year period (2011–2013) in southwestern Ontario to evaluate the level of weed control provided by various halosulfuron tankmixes applied preplant incorporated (PPI) in white bean. Trifluralin, s-metolachlor, halosulfuron, and imazethapyr applied alone or in combination caused 4% or less visible injury 1 and 4 weeks after emergence (WAE) in white bean. Trifluralin, s-metolachlor, halosulfuron, and imazethapyr applied PPI provided 80–96%, 84–95%, 83–100%, and 75–92% control of redroot pigweed; 19–28%, 30–40%, 97–99%, and 73–84% control of common ragweed; 94–96%, 63–82%, 96–100%, and 96–100% control of common lambsquarters; 14-15%, 12–35%, 100%, and 96–97% control of wild mustard; and 96–97%, 95–97%, 53–56%, and 80–82% control of green foxtail, respectively. The two- and three-way tankmixes of halosulfuron with trifluralin, s-metolachlor, or imazethapyr provided 85–100% control of redroot pigweed, 90–98% control of common ragweed, 97–100% control of common lambsquarters, 100% control of wild mustard, and 93–98% control of green foxtail. Weed density, weed biomass and white bean seed yields reflected the level of visible weed control. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-53c640c1897841c391856ba0f316e302 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2356-654X 2314-7539 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Agriculture |
| spelling | doaj-art-53c640c1897841c391856ba0f316e3022025-02-03T05:50:35ZengWileyAdvances in Agriculture2356-654X2314-75392014-01-01201410.1155/2014/391634391634Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron TankmixesNader Soltani0Robert E. Nurse1Christy Shropshire2Peter H. Sikkema3University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON, N0R 1G0, CanadaUniversity of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, CanadaUniversity of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, CanadaFour field trials were conducted over a three-year period (2011–2013) in southwestern Ontario to evaluate the level of weed control provided by various halosulfuron tankmixes applied preplant incorporated (PPI) in white bean. Trifluralin, s-metolachlor, halosulfuron, and imazethapyr applied alone or in combination caused 4% or less visible injury 1 and 4 weeks after emergence (WAE) in white bean. Trifluralin, s-metolachlor, halosulfuron, and imazethapyr applied PPI provided 80–96%, 84–95%, 83–100%, and 75–92% control of redroot pigweed; 19–28%, 30–40%, 97–99%, and 73–84% control of common ragweed; 94–96%, 63–82%, 96–100%, and 96–100% control of common lambsquarters; 14-15%, 12–35%, 100%, and 96–97% control of wild mustard; and 96–97%, 95–97%, 53–56%, and 80–82% control of green foxtail, respectively. The two- and three-way tankmixes of halosulfuron with trifluralin, s-metolachlor, or imazethapyr provided 85–100% control of redroot pigweed, 90–98% control of common ragweed, 97–100% control of common lambsquarters, 100% control of wild mustard, and 93–98% control of green foxtail. Weed density, weed biomass and white bean seed yields reflected the level of visible weed control.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/391634 |
| spellingShingle | Nader Soltani Robert E. Nurse Christy Shropshire Peter H. Sikkema Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron Tankmixes Advances in Agriculture |
| title | Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron Tankmixes |
| title_full | Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron Tankmixes |
| title_fullStr | Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron Tankmixes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron Tankmixes |
| title_short | Weed Control in White Bean with Various Halosulfuron Tankmixes |
| title_sort | weed control in white bean with various halosulfuron tankmixes |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/391634 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nadersoltani weedcontrolinwhitebeanwithvarioushalosulfurontankmixes AT robertenurse weedcontrolinwhitebeanwithvarioushalosulfurontankmixes AT christyshropshire weedcontrolinwhitebeanwithvarioushalosulfurontankmixes AT peterhsikkema weedcontrolinwhitebeanwithvarioushalosulfurontankmixes |