Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms

ABSTRACT Three clustering algorithms, K‐means clustering analysis (KCA), fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA), and density‐based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), are applied to classify the 13 subbasins of the Mahe River, southwest India, based on 13 morphometric parameters of each. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ajith G. Nair, R. Kiran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Flood Risk Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70079
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849430360775983104
author Ajith G. Nair
R. Kiran
author_facet Ajith G. Nair
R. Kiran
author_sort Ajith G. Nair
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Three clustering algorithms, K‐means clustering analysis (KCA), fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA), and density‐based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), are applied to classify the 13 subbasins of the Mahe River, southwest India, based on 13 morphometric parameters of each. Suitable validation indices, such as Davies–Bouldin and Calinski–Harabasz indices, have been used to select the optimal number of clusters using KCA and FCA techniques. All three analyses have yielded three clusters, with subbasins 3–8 forming the first one. These constitute 23% of the total basin area of the Mahe. SW 12 forms a grouping of its own. The rest, SW 1–2, 9–11, and 13, form the third cluster. The first cluster corresponds to the subbasins identified as most susceptible to flooding. Cluster 3 encompasses the subbasins falling in the “Moderate” and “Least” categories with respect to the risk of flooding. The subbasin 12 (< 1 km2) exhibits a deviant morphometric pattern likely due to its specific topographical and network characteristics. The study reveals that cluster algorithms are effective in ranking and prioritizing subbasins of a river based on their potential for natural hazards like flooding. Moreover, the DBSCAN averts the use of cluster validation indices to determine the optimum clusters without compromising the results. All these methods would be beneficial in chalking out suitable management measures for different subbasins of a river based on their potential for any given hazard.
format Article
id doaj-art-53a0fd9dbba54d3c9d55fedac320b770
institution Kabale University
issn 1753-318X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Flood Risk Management
spelling doaj-art-53a0fd9dbba54d3c9d55fedac320b7702025-08-20T03:28:01ZengWileyJournal of Flood Risk Management1753-318X2025-06-01182n/an/a10.1111/jfr3.70079Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster AlgorithmsAjith G. Nair0R. Kiran1Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering Trivandrum Thiruvananthapuram Kerala IndiaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering Government Engineering College Idukki Idukki Kerala IndiaABSTRACT Three clustering algorithms, K‐means clustering analysis (KCA), fuzzy cluster analysis (FCA), and density‐based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), are applied to classify the 13 subbasins of the Mahe River, southwest India, based on 13 morphometric parameters of each. Suitable validation indices, such as Davies–Bouldin and Calinski–Harabasz indices, have been used to select the optimal number of clusters using KCA and FCA techniques. All three analyses have yielded three clusters, with subbasins 3–8 forming the first one. These constitute 23% of the total basin area of the Mahe. SW 12 forms a grouping of its own. The rest, SW 1–2, 9–11, and 13, form the third cluster. The first cluster corresponds to the subbasins identified as most susceptible to flooding. Cluster 3 encompasses the subbasins falling in the “Moderate” and “Least” categories with respect to the risk of flooding. The subbasin 12 (< 1 km2) exhibits a deviant morphometric pattern likely due to its specific topographical and network characteristics. The study reveals that cluster algorithms are effective in ranking and prioritizing subbasins of a river based on their potential for natural hazards like flooding. Moreover, the DBSCAN averts the use of cluster validation indices to determine the optimum clusters without compromising the results. All these methods would be beneficial in chalking out suitable management measures for different subbasins of a river based on their potential for any given hazard.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70079cluster algorithmsfloodingMahemorphometric parameterssubbasins
spellingShingle Ajith G. Nair
R. Kiran
Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms
Journal of Flood Risk Management
cluster algorithms
flooding
Mahe
morphometric parameters
subbasins
title Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms
title_full Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms
title_fullStr Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms
title_short Classification and Flooding Potential Assessment of Subbasins of a Tropical River Using Cluster Algorithms
title_sort classification and flooding potential assessment of subbasins of a tropical river using cluster algorithms
topic cluster algorithms
flooding
Mahe
morphometric parameters
subbasins
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70079
work_keys_str_mv AT ajithgnair classificationandfloodingpotentialassessmentofsubbasinsofatropicalriverusingclusteralgorithms
AT rkiran classificationandfloodingpotentialassessmentofsubbasinsofatropicalriverusingclusteralgorithms