Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment
The Kairos wristband offers on-demand heart rate variability (HRV) assessment through its “Spot Check” feature, enabling standardized recordings for clinical, research, or self-tracking purposes, but its validity is untested. Therefore, we compared the Kairos wristband to electrocardiography (ECG) f...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/10/3165 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849327002649100288 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrew A. Flatt Ann Claire E. Blalock Allison N. Wade Bryan L. Riemann |
| author_facet | Andrew A. Flatt Ann Claire E. Blalock Allison N. Wade Bryan L. Riemann |
| author_sort | Andrew A. Flatt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Kairos wristband offers on-demand heart rate variability (HRV) assessment through its “Spot Check” feature, enabling standardized recordings for clinical, research, or self-tracking purposes, but its validity is untested. Therefore, we compared the Kairos wristband to electrocardiography (ECG) for resting HRV assessment in young adults, and investigated the influence of skin pigmentation (M-index) on measurement accuracy. Simultaneous 3 min Kairos and ECG samples were obtained in the supine (n = 32) and seated (n = 30) position. Comparisons included resting heart rate (RHR) and time domain (root-mean square of successive differences [RMSSD], standard deviation of normal RR intervals [SDNN]), frequency domain (low [LF] and high frequency [HF]), and non-linear (standard deviation 1 [SD1] and SD2) HRV metrics. RHR showed excellent agreement whereas HF, LF, and SD2 showed poor agreement. For the remaining metrics, SDNN showed the strongest absolute and relative agreement, followed by SD1 and RMSSD. However, most HRV metrics exhibited heteroscedasticity or proportional bias, with greater error and underestimation at higher HRV values. M-index was unrelated to method difference scores, except for seated SD2 (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The Kairos wristband can be used to measure RHR, but HRV assessment should be limited to SDNN for global variability and SD1 or RMSSD for cardiac–parasympathetic activity. However, these metrics should be interpreted within the level of agreement identified in this study, and with consideration of the observed trend of diminished accuracy with higher HRV values. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-538fb3af0906478c96c5c48947fbaec0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1424-8220 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sensors |
| spelling | doaj-art-538fb3af0906478c96c5c48947fbaec02025-08-20T03:48:01ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202025-05-012510316510.3390/s25103165Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability AssessmentAndrew A. Flatt0Ann Claire E. Blalock1Allison N. Wade2Bryan L. Riemann3Biodynamics and Human Performance Center, Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Armstrong Campus, 11935 Abercorn St., Savannah, GA 31419, USABiodynamics and Human Performance Center, Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Armstrong Campus, 11935 Abercorn St., Savannah, GA 31419, USABiodynamics and Human Performance Center, Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Armstrong Campus, 11935 Abercorn St., Savannah, GA 31419, USABiodynamics and Human Performance Center, Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Armstrong Campus, 11935 Abercorn St., Savannah, GA 31419, USAThe Kairos wristband offers on-demand heart rate variability (HRV) assessment through its “Spot Check” feature, enabling standardized recordings for clinical, research, or self-tracking purposes, but its validity is untested. Therefore, we compared the Kairos wristband to electrocardiography (ECG) for resting HRV assessment in young adults, and investigated the influence of skin pigmentation (M-index) on measurement accuracy. Simultaneous 3 min Kairos and ECG samples were obtained in the supine (n = 32) and seated (n = 30) position. Comparisons included resting heart rate (RHR) and time domain (root-mean square of successive differences [RMSSD], standard deviation of normal RR intervals [SDNN]), frequency domain (low [LF] and high frequency [HF]), and non-linear (standard deviation 1 [SD1] and SD2) HRV metrics. RHR showed excellent agreement whereas HF, LF, and SD2 showed poor agreement. For the remaining metrics, SDNN showed the strongest absolute and relative agreement, followed by SD1 and RMSSD. However, most HRV metrics exhibited heteroscedasticity or proportional bias, with greater error and underestimation at higher HRV values. M-index was unrelated to method difference scores, except for seated SD2 (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The Kairos wristband can be used to measure RHR, but HRV assessment should be limited to SDNN for global variability and SD1 or RMSSD for cardiac–parasympathetic activity. However, these metrics should be interpreted within the level of agreement identified in this study, and with consideration of the observed trend of diminished accuracy with higher HRV values.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/10/3165wearable technologym-healthcardiovasculardevice validationautonomic nervous system |
| spellingShingle | Andrew A. Flatt Ann Claire E. Blalock Allison N. Wade Bryan L. Riemann Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment Sensors wearable technology m-health cardiovascular device validation autonomic nervous system |
| title | Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment |
| title_full | Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment |
| title_fullStr | Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment |
| title_short | Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment |
| title_sort | biostrap kairos wristband versus electrocardiography for resting heart rate variability assessment |
| topic | wearable technology m-health cardiovascular device validation autonomic nervous system |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/10/3165 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andrewaflatt biostrapkairoswristbandversuselectrocardiographyforrestingheartratevariabilityassessment AT annclaireeblalock biostrapkairoswristbandversuselectrocardiographyforrestingheartratevariabilityassessment AT allisonnwade biostrapkairoswristbandversuselectrocardiographyforrestingheartratevariabilityassessment AT bryanlriemann biostrapkairoswristbandversuselectrocardiographyforrestingheartratevariabilityassessment |