NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition

NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are crucial in activity-dependent synaptic changes and in learning and memory. NMDARs are composed of two GluN1 essential subunits and two regulatory subunits which define their pharmacological and physiological profile. In CNS structures involved in cogn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María Verónica Baez, Magalí Cecilia Cercato, Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5093048
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563633675042816
author María Verónica Baez
Magalí Cecilia Cercato
Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
author_facet María Verónica Baez
Magalí Cecilia Cercato
Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
author_sort María Verónica Baez
collection DOAJ
description NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are crucial in activity-dependent synaptic changes and in learning and memory. NMDARs are composed of two GluN1 essential subunits and two regulatory subunits which define their pharmacological and physiological profile. In CNS structures involved in cognitive functions as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, GluN2A and GluN2B are major regulatory subunits; their expression is dynamic and tightly regulated, but little is known about specific changes after plasticity induction or memory acquisition. Data strongly suggest that following appropriate stimulation, there is a rapid increase in surface GluN2A-NMDAR at the postsynapses, attributed to lateral receptor mobilization from adjacent locations. Whenever synaptic plasticity is induced or memory is consolidated, more GluN2A-NMDARs are assembled likely using GluN2A from a local translation and GluN1 from local ER. Later on, NMDARs are mobilized from other pools, and there are de novo syntheses at the neuron soma. Changes in GluN1 or NMDAR levels induced by synaptic plasticity and by spatial memory formation seem to occur in different waves of NMDAR transport/expression/degradation, with a net increase at the postsynaptic side and a rise in expression at both the spine and neuronal soma. This review aims to put together that information and the proposed hypotheses.
format Article
id doaj-art-5367f45f3cf04c9a85745a13930ce6f1
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-5367f45f3cf04c9a85745a13930ce6f12025-02-03T01:12:59ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432018-01-01201810.1155/2018/50930485093048NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory AcquisitionMaría Verónica Baez0Magalí Cecilia Cercato1Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky2Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia “Prof. E. De Robertis”, UBA-CONICET, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, 2155 Paraguay St., 1121 CABA, ArgentinaInstituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia “Prof. E. De Robertis”, UBA-CONICET, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, 2155 Paraguay St., 1121 CABA, ArgentinaInstituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia “Prof. E. De Robertis”, UBA-CONICET, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, 2155 Paraguay St., 1121 CABA, ArgentinaNMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are crucial in activity-dependent synaptic changes and in learning and memory. NMDARs are composed of two GluN1 essential subunits and two regulatory subunits which define their pharmacological and physiological profile. In CNS structures involved in cognitive functions as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, GluN2A and GluN2B are major regulatory subunits; their expression is dynamic and tightly regulated, but little is known about specific changes after plasticity induction or memory acquisition. Data strongly suggest that following appropriate stimulation, there is a rapid increase in surface GluN2A-NMDAR at the postsynapses, attributed to lateral receptor mobilization from adjacent locations. Whenever synaptic plasticity is induced or memory is consolidated, more GluN2A-NMDARs are assembled likely using GluN2A from a local translation and GluN1 from local ER. Later on, NMDARs are mobilized from other pools, and there are de novo syntheses at the neuron soma. Changes in GluN1 or NMDAR levels induced by synaptic plasticity and by spatial memory formation seem to occur in different waves of NMDAR transport/expression/degradation, with a net increase at the postsynaptic side and a rise in expression at both the spine and neuronal soma. This review aims to put together that information and the proposed hypotheses.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5093048
spellingShingle María Verónica Baez
Magalí Cecilia Cercato
Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition
Neural Plasticity
title NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition
title_full NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition
title_fullStr NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition
title_full_unstemmed NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition
title_short NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition
title_sort nmda receptor subunits change after synaptic plasticity induction and learning and memory acquisition
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5093048
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaveronicabaez nmdareceptorsubunitschangeaftersynapticplasticityinductionandlearningandmemoryacquisition
AT magaliceciliacercato nmdareceptorsubunitschangeaftersynapticplasticityinductionandlearningandmemoryacquisition
AT dianaaliciajerusalinsky nmdareceptorsubunitschangeaftersynapticplasticityinductionandlearningandmemoryacquisition