Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter

Aim:To compare the results of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (micro-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for symptomatic renal stones 5-10 mm in diameter.Methods:A total of 86 patients, who underwent RIRS (n=53) and micro-PNL (n=23), were evaluated retrospectively. Urine analysis, serum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bayram Güner, Bilal Günaydın
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Publishing House 2020-03-01
Series:Haseki Tıp Bülteni
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.hasekidergisi.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-retrograde-ntrarenal-surgery-and-mic/36501
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405813638037504
author Bayram Güner
Bilal Günaydın
author_facet Bayram Güner
Bilal Günaydın
author_sort Bayram Güner
collection DOAJ
description Aim:To compare the results of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (micro-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for symptomatic renal stones 5-10 mm in diameter.Methods:A total of 86 patients, who underwent RIRS (n=53) and micro-PNL (n=23), were evaluated retrospectively. Urine analysis, serum creatinine level, urine culture and non-contrast computed tomography scan were performed in all patients preoperatively. Kidney stones were opaque in all cases. Unresolved coagulopathy, active urinary infection, morbid obesity, missing data and pregnancy were considered the criteria for exclusion. The groups were compared in terms of operative time, Visual analogue scale score, analgesic requirement, retreatment, transition to other treatment, complication and stone-free rates and length of hospital stay.Results:Both surgical techniques were similar for all parameters except need for analgesics, which was higher in the micro-PNL group (p=0.026). The stone-free rate was 85.7% in the RIRS group and 78.2% in the micro-PNL group (p=0.43).Conclusion:Both methods can be administered as alternative modalities with high success and low complication rates. However, analgesics requirement was higher in micro-PNL group.
format Article
id doaj-art-533fb554bc26489ba03645b77d9ef5fd
institution Kabale University
issn 1302-0072
2147-2688
language English
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Galenos Publishing House
record_format Article
series Haseki Tıp Bülteni
spelling doaj-art-533fb554bc26489ba03645b77d9ef5fd2025-08-20T03:36:34ZengGalenos Publishing HouseHaseki Tıp Bülteni1302-00722147-26882020-03-0158214815210.4274/haseki.galenos.2020.560513049054Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in DiameterBayram Güner0Bilal Günaydın1 Edremit Körfez Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Balıkesir, Turkey Ömer Halisdemir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Niğde, Turkey Aim:To compare the results of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (micro-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for symptomatic renal stones 5-10 mm in diameter.Methods:A total of 86 patients, who underwent RIRS (n=53) and micro-PNL (n=23), were evaluated retrospectively. Urine analysis, serum creatinine level, urine culture and non-contrast computed tomography scan were performed in all patients preoperatively. Kidney stones were opaque in all cases. Unresolved coagulopathy, active urinary infection, morbid obesity, missing data and pregnancy were considered the criteria for exclusion. The groups were compared in terms of operative time, Visual analogue scale score, analgesic requirement, retreatment, transition to other treatment, complication and stone-free rates and length of hospital stay.Results:Both surgical techniques were similar for all parameters except need for analgesics, which was higher in the micro-PNL group (p=0.026). The stone-free rate was 85.7% in the RIRS group and 78.2% in the micro-PNL group (p=0.43).Conclusion:Both methods can be administered as alternative modalities with high success and low complication rates. However, analgesics requirement was higher in micro-PNL group. http://www.hasekidergisi.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-retrograde-ntrarenal-surgery-and-mic/36501 micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomyretrograde intrarenal surgerykidney stoneureteroscopy
spellingShingle Bayram Güner
Bilal Günaydın
Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter
Haseki Tıp Bülteni
micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
retrograde intrarenal surgery
kidney stone
ureteroscopy
title Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter
title_full Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter
title_fullStr Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter
title_short Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter
title_sort comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones 5 10 mm in diameter
topic micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
retrograde intrarenal surgery
kidney stone
ureteroscopy
url http://www.hasekidergisi.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparison-of-retrograde-ntrarenal-surgery-and-mic/36501
work_keys_str_mv AT bayramguner comparisonofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryandmicropercutaneousnephrolithotomyforkidneystones510mmindiameter
AT bilalgunaydın comparisonofretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryandmicropercutaneousnephrolithotomyforkidneystones510mmindiameter