Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background: In recent years, it has become increasingly common to incorporate the patient perspective into drug development and regulatory decision making. Objective: This study aimed to measure and quantify patient preferences (priorities and trade-offs) for attributes that characterize current and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olufemi Babalola, MHS, MSc, PhD, Richard Hass, PhD, John McAna, PhD, Manav Segal, MD, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, PhD, Olajumoke Fadugba, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829325000694
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849343715083026432
author Olufemi Babalola, MHS, MSc, PhD
Richard Hass, PhD
John McAna, PhD
Manav Segal, MD
Juan Marcos Gonzalez, PhD
Olajumoke Fadugba, MD
author_facet Olufemi Babalola, MHS, MSc, PhD
Richard Hass, PhD
John McAna, PhD
Manav Segal, MD
Juan Marcos Gonzalez, PhD
Olajumoke Fadugba, MD
author_sort Olufemi Babalola, MHS, MSc, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Background: In recent years, it has become increasingly common to incorporate the patient perspective into drug development and regulatory decision making. Objective: This study aimed to measure and quantify patient preferences (priorities and trade-offs) for attributes that characterize current and emerging refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (rCSU) treatments. Methods: Adult patients with self-reported rCSU symptoms completed an online discrete choice experiment survey. The survey included 10 questions that asked respondents to choose between 2 hypothetical rCSU treatment profiles having similar attributes with varying levels. The attributes included the following: chance of control of symptoms, time to symptom control, return of symptoms after discontinuation of therapy (complete remission), allergic reaction, risk of kidney dysfunction (usually reversible), and mode and frequency of administration. Relative attribute importance and maximum acceptable risks were calculated. Results: A total of 213 subjects with a mean age of 51 years completed the survey. Efficacy (symptom control) and mode of administration were the 2 most important attributes to treatment choice, followed by risk of kidney dysfunction and time to achieve symptom control. Complete remission of symptoms and risk of allergic reaction were identified as least important. With regard to mode of administration, topical treatment was the most preferred option and infusion therapy was least preferred. Respondents who were presented with a scenario of refractory and severe chronic spontaneous urticaria were willing to accept increased risk of reversible kidney dysfunction in exchange for improvement in symptom control or complete remission. Respondents were willing to accept infusion over topical treatment if there was significant increase in treatment efficacy. Conclusion: These study results can be used to inform development and evaluation of future rCSU therapies by product developers and regulatory authorities, respectively.
format Article
id doaj-art-5334e8fb5f2e474e82dd016212c57fe4
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-8293
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global
spelling doaj-art-5334e8fb5f2e474e82dd016212c57fe42025-08-20T03:42:53ZengElsevierJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global2772-82932025-08-014310046810.1016/j.jacig.2025.100468Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticariaOlufemi Babalola, MHS, MSc, PhD0Richard Hass, PhD1John McAna, PhD2Manav Segal, MD3Juan Marcos Gonzalez, PhD4Olajumoke Fadugba, MD5Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PaJefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PaJefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PaChestnut Hill Allergy and Asthma Associates, Wyndmoor, PaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NCSection of Allergy and Immunology, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Corresponding author: Olajumoke O. Fadugba, MD, 3737 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104.Background: In recent years, it has become increasingly common to incorporate the patient perspective into drug development and regulatory decision making. Objective: This study aimed to measure and quantify patient preferences (priorities and trade-offs) for attributes that characterize current and emerging refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (rCSU) treatments. Methods: Adult patients with self-reported rCSU symptoms completed an online discrete choice experiment survey. The survey included 10 questions that asked respondents to choose between 2 hypothetical rCSU treatment profiles having similar attributes with varying levels. The attributes included the following: chance of control of symptoms, time to symptom control, return of symptoms after discontinuation of therapy (complete remission), allergic reaction, risk of kidney dysfunction (usually reversible), and mode and frequency of administration. Relative attribute importance and maximum acceptable risks were calculated. Results: A total of 213 subjects with a mean age of 51 years completed the survey. Efficacy (symptom control) and mode of administration were the 2 most important attributes to treatment choice, followed by risk of kidney dysfunction and time to achieve symptom control. Complete remission of symptoms and risk of allergic reaction were identified as least important. With regard to mode of administration, topical treatment was the most preferred option and infusion therapy was least preferred. Respondents who were presented with a scenario of refractory and severe chronic spontaneous urticaria were willing to accept increased risk of reversible kidney dysfunction in exchange for improvement in symptom control or complete remission. Respondents were willing to accept infusion over topical treatment if there was significant increase in treatment efficacy. Conclusion: These study results can be used to inform development and evaluation of future rCSU therapies by product developers and regulatory authorities, respectively.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829325000694Patient preferencediscrete choice experimentrefractory chronic urticariabenefit-risktrade-offproduct development
spellingShingle Olufemi Babalola, MHS, MSc, PhD
Richard Hass, PhD
John McAna, PhD
Manav Segal, MD
Juan Marcos Gonzalez, PhD
Olajumoke Fadugba, MD
Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global
Patient preference
discrete choice experiment
refractory chronic urticaria
benefit-risk
trade-off
product development
title Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria
title_full Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria
title_fullStr Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria
title_short Quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria
title_sort quantifying patient preferences for treatments for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria
topic Patient preference
discrete choice experiment
refractory chronic urticaria
benefit-risk
trade-off
product development
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829325000694
work_keys_str_mv AT olufemibabalolamhsmscphd quantifyingpatientpreferencesfortreatmentsforrefractorychronicspontaneousurticaria
AT richardhassphd quantifyingpatientpreferencesfortreatmentsforrefractorychronicspontaneousurticaria
AT johnmcanaphd quantifyingpatientpreferencesfortreatmentsforrefractorychronicspontaneousurticaria
AT manavsegalmd quantifyingpatientpreferencesfortreatmentsforrefractorychronicspontaneousurticaria
AT juanmarcosgonzalezphd quantifyingpatientpreferencesfortreatmentsforrefractorychronicspontaneousurticaria
AT olajumokefadugbamd quantifyingpatientpreferencesfortreatmentsforrefractorychronicspontaneousurticaria