Forfeiture to the State: Using Grammar to Interpret Section 35 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Section 35(1)(a) of South Africa's Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 allows a court of law to declare items forfeited to the state if they were used as weapons or instruments in aid of committing an offence. However, it is not always clear what qualifies as potential instruments of crime or wh...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Terrence R Carney |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
North-West University
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/19242 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Stolen asset recovery : a good practices guide for non-conviction based asset forfeiture /
Published: (2009) -
Concept of Criminal Policy and Improvement of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law
by: I. N. Kondrat
Published: (2013-06-01) -
PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TERMS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
by: Nerija Kovalenkovienė, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Regulation Act of Torture in Criminal Code: Opportunity and Challenge to Improve Human Rights Situation in Indonesia
by: M. Rizki Yudha Prawira
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar /
by: Halliday, M. A. K. (Michael Alexander Kirkwood), 1925-
Published: (2014)