Forfeiture to the State: Using Grammar to Interpret Section 35 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Section 35(1)(a) of South Africa's Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 allows a court of law to declare items forfeited to the state if they were used as weapons or instruments in aid of committing an offence. However, it is not always clear what qualifies as potential instruments of crime or wh...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Terrence R Carney |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Afrikaans |
| Published: |
North-West University
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/19242 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Proposal for policy change in the procedure of civil asset forfeiture [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Nikolaos Tzenios
Published: (2023-01-01) -
THE IMPORTANCE OF REGULATING NON-CONCIVTION BASED FORFEITURE IN CORRUPTION CASES IN INDONESIA
by: Lily Solichul Mukminah, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Legal nature and the criminal law effect (substantive and procedural) of statute of limitations of criminal prosecution
by: Škulić Milan
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Legal nature and the criminal law effect: Substantive and procedural: Of statute of limitations of criminal prosecution
by: Škulić Milan
Published: (2017-01-01) -
BRIEF COMMENTS ON ISSUES CONCERNING THE FORFEITURE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN THE CIVIL TRIAL
by: Emilian-Constantin MEIU
Published: (2018-05-01)