Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview study

Objectives Involving end-users and patients in the development of surgical devices, even when patients are not end-users, is deemed important in policy and in academia since it could improve strategic choices in research and development (R&D). Nonetheless, research into innovators’ views on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maroeska M Rovers, Kas Woudstra, Marcia Tummers, Rob Reuzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e050801.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850136896760446976
author Maroeska M Rovers
Kas Woudstra
Marcia Tummers
Rob Reuzel
author_facet Maroeska M Rovers
Kas Woudstra
Marcia Tummers
Rob Reuzel
author_sort Maroeska M Rovers
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Involving end-users and patients in the development of surgical devices, even when patients are not end-users, is deemed important in policy and in academia since it could improve strategic choices in research and development (R&D). Nonetheless, research into innovators’ views on end-user and patient involvement is rare. This study explores what end-users and patients are being involved by innovators during development, what methods for involvement are being used and what topics are being discussed with these end-users and patients.Design A qualitative study featuring semi-structured interviews with innovators of surgical devices. Interviews were recorded and a thematic analysis was performed on verbatim transcripts.Participants 15 interviews were conducted with 19 innovators of 14 surgical devices.Setting Innovation practices of surgical devices in the Netherlands and Belgium.Results End-users were engaged in R&D with formal methods and in unsystematic ways. These users all work in the clinical domain, for example, as surgeons or nurses. The innovators engaged users to analyse problems for which a device could be a solution, define functionalities, make design choices, analyse usability, ensure safety and improve aesthetics. Patients were rarely involved. Innovators stated that patients are not considered to be end-users, that physicians can represent patient interests and that involving patients is unethical as false expectations could be raised.Conclusion Innovators involve end-users with methods and unsystematic ways in the development of surgical devices. Despite governmental calls for patient involvement in the development of medical devices and surgical devices, innovators do not generally involve patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-52cf9e85c40f4a7db7067210f9dfcaf5
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-52cf9e85c40f4a7db7067210f9dfcaf52025-08-20T02:31:00ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-08-0111810.1136/bmjopen-2021-050801Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview studyMaroeska M Rovers0Kas Woudstra1Marcia Tummers2Rob Reuzel3Department of Operating Rooms, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The NetherlandsOperating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsHealth Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsOperation Rooms, Health Evidence, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsObjectives Involving end-users and patients in the development of surgical devices, even when patients are not end-users, is deemed important in policy and in academia since it could improve strategic choices in research and development (R&D). Nonetheless, research into innovators’ views on end-user and patient involvement is rare. This study explores what end-users and patients are being involved by innovators during development, what methods for involvement are being used and what topics are being discussed with these end-users and patients.Design A qualitative study featuring semi-structured interviews with innovators of surgical devices. Interviews were recorded and a thematic analysis was performed on verbatim transcripts.Participants 15 interviews were conducted with 19 innovators of 14 surgical devices.Setting Innovation practices of surgical devices in the Netherlands and Belgium.Results End-users were engaged in R&D with formal methods and in unsystematic ways. These users all work in the clinical domain, for example, as surgeons or nurses. The innovators engaged users to analyse problems for which a device could be a solution, define functionalities, make design choices, analyse usability, ensure safety and improve aesthetics. Patients were rarely involved. Innovators stated that patients are not considered to be end-users, that physicians can represent patient interests and that involving patients is unethical as false expectations could be raised.Conclusion Innovators involve end-users with methods and unsystematic ways in the development of surgical devices. Despite governmental calls for patient involvement in the development of medical devices and surgical devices, innovators do not generally involve patients.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e050801.full
spellingShingle Maroeska M Rovers
Kas Woudstra
Marcia Tummers
Rob Reuzel
Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview study
BMJ Open
title Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview study
title_full Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview study
title_short Innovators’ views on involving users and patients in surgical device development: a qualitative interview study
title_sort innovators views on involving users and patients in surgical device development a qualitative interview study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e050801.full
work_keys_str_mv AT maroeskamrovers innovatorsviewsoninvolvingusersandpatientsinsurgicaldevicedevelopmentaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT kaswoudstra innovatorsviewsoninvolvingusersandpatientsinsurgicaldevicedevelopmentaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT marciatummers innovatorsviewsoninvolvingusersandpatientsinsurgicaldevicedevelopmentaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT robreuzel innovatorsviewsoninvolvingusersandpatientsinsurgicaldevicedevelopmentaqualitativeinterviewstudy