How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model?
Abstract Land surface modeling combined with data assimilation can yield highly accurate soil moisture estimates on regional and global scales. However, most land surface models often neglect lateral surface and subsurface flows, which are crucial for water redistribution and soil moisture. This stu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Water Resources Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR038647 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849425295326576640 |
|---|---|
| author | Haojin Zhao Carsten Montzka Johannes Keller Fang Li Harry Vereecken Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen |
| author_facet | Haojin Zhao Carsten Montzka Johannes Keller Fang Li Harry Vereecken Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen |
| author_sort | Haojin Zhao |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Land surface modeling combined with data assimilation can yield highly accurate soil moisture estimates on regional and global scales. However, most land surface models often neglect lateral surface and subsurface flows, which are crucial for water redistribution and soil moisture. This study applies the Community Land Model (CLM) and the coupled CLM‐ParFlow model over a 22,500 km2 area in western Germany. Soil moisture retrievals from the Soil Moisture Active Passive mission are assimilated with the Localized Ensemble Kalman Filter (with and without parameter estimation). The simulated soil moisture, evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater level are evaluated using in situ observations from a Cosmic‐Ray Neutron Sensor network, Eddy Covariance (EC) stations and groundwater measurement wells. The assimilation improves the median correlation between simulated and measured soil moisture from 0.72 ∼ 0.79 to 0.79 ∼ 0.83 and decreases the median unbiased Root Mean Square Error (ubRMSE) from 0.063 ∼ 0.060 cm3/cm3 to 0.050 ∼ 0.045 cm3/cm3. ET characterization shows a limited improvement with a highest ubRMSE reduction of 15% at the Rollesbroich1 site with the CLM‐ParFlow model. The assimilation does not improve the groundwater level characterization. Furthermore, the joint state‐parameter update does not outperform state‐only update. Overall, the simulation of full 3D subsurface hydrology with the ParFlow model component results in additional model outputs like groundwater levels and river stages, and a better soil moisture characterization (compared to CLM stand‐alone), but it does not make soil moisture assimilation more efficient to correct model states. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-52a2acf6368c446dac7f80b714bb243a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Water Resources Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-52a2acf6368c446dac7f80b714bb243a2025-08-20T03:29:48ZengWileyWater Resources Research0043-13971944-79732025-06-01616n/an/a10.1029/2024WR038647How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model?Haojin Zhao0Carsten Montzka1Johannes Keller2Fang Li3Harry Vereecken4Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen5Agrosphere Institute (IBG‐3), Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich GermanyAgrosphere Institute (IBG‐3), Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich GermanyAgrosphere Institute (IBG‐3), Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich GermanyAgrosphere Institute (IBG‐3), Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich GermanyAgrosphere Institute (IBG‐3), Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich GermanyAgrosphere Institute (IBG‐3), Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich GermanyAbstract Land surface modeling combined with data assimilation can yield highly accurate soil moisture estimates on regional and global scales. However, most land surface models often neglect lateral surface and subsurface flows, which are crucial for water redistribution and soil moisture. This study applies the Community Land Model (CLM) and the coupled CLM‐ParFlow model over a 22,500 km2 area in western Germany. Soil moisture retrievals from the Soil Moisture Active Passive mission are assimilated with the Localized Ensemble Kalman Filter (with and without parameter estimation). The simulated soil moisture, evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater level are evaluated using in situ observations from a Cosmic‐Ray Neutron Sensor network, Eddy Covariance (EC) stations and groundwater measurement wells. The assimilation improves the median correlation between simulated and measured soil moisture from 0.72 ∼ 0.79 to 0.79 ∼ 0.83 and decreases the median unbiased Root Mean Square Error (ubRMSE) from 0.063 ∼ 0.060 cm3/cm3 to 0.050 ∼ 0.045 cm3/cm3. ET characterization shows a limited improvement with a highest ubRMSE reduction of 15% at the Rollesbroich1 site with the CLM‐ParFlow model. The assimilation does not improve the groundwater level characterization. Furthermore, the joint state‐parameter update does not outperform state‐only update. Overall, the simulation of full 3D subsurface hydrology with the ParFlow model component results in additional model outputs like groundwater levels and river stages, and a better soil moisture characterization (compared to CLM stand‐alone), but it does not make soil moisture assimilation more efficient to correct model states.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR038647soil moisturedata assimilationland surface modellingintegrated hydrological modellingremote sensing |
| spellingShingle | Haojin Zhao Carsten Montzka Johannes Keller Fang Li Harry Vereecken Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model? Water Resources Research soil moisture data assimilation land surface modelling integrated hydrological modelling remote sensing |
| title | How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model? |
| title_full | How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model? |
| title_fullStr | How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model? |
| title_full_unstemmed | How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model? |
| title_short | How Does Assimilating SMAP Soil Moisture Improve Characterization of the Terrestrial Water Cycle in an Integrated Land Surface‐Subsurface Model? |
| title_sort | how does assimilating smap soil moisture improve characterization of the terrestrial water cycle in an integrated land surface subsurface model |
| topic | soil moisture data assimilation land surface modelling integrated hydrological modelling remote sensing |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR038647 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT haojinzhao howdoesassimilatingsmapsoilmoistureimprovecharacterizationoftheterrestrialwatercycleinanintegratedlandsurfacesubsurfacemodel AT carstenmontzka howdoesassimilatingsmapsoilmoistureimprovecharacterizationoftheterrestrialwatercycleinanintegratedlandsurfacesubsurfacemodel AT johanneskeller howdoesassimilatingsmapsoilmoistureimprovecharacterizationoftheterrestrialwatercycleinanintegratedlandsurfacesubsurfacemodel AT fangli howdoesassimilatingsmapsoilmoistureimprovecharacterizationoftheterrestrialwatercycleinanintegratedlandsurfacesubsurfacemodel AT harryvereecken howdoesassimilatingsmapsoilmoistureimprovecharacterizationoftheterrestrialwatercycleinanintegratedlandsurfacesubsurfacemodel AT harriejanhendricksfranssen howdoesassimilatingsmapsoilmoistureimprovecharacterizationoftheterrestrialwatercycleinanintegratedlandsurfacesubsurfacemodel |