The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms

Abstract Background The herd age structure, i.e., distribution of sows within a farm based on their parity number, and its management are essential to optimizing farm reproductive efficiency. The objective of this study is to define different types of herd age structure using data from 623 Spanish c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santos Sanz-Fernández, Cipriano Díaz-Gaona, João Simões, José Carlos Casas-Rosal, Nuria Alòs, Llibertat Tusell, Raquel Quintanilla, Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-11-01
Series:Porcine Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00406-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850162712059838464
author Santos Sanz-Fernández
Cipriano Díaz-Gaona
João Simões
José Carlos Casas-Rosal
Nuria Alòs
Llibertat Tusell
Raquel Quintanilla
Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez
author_facet Santos Sanz-Fernández
Cipriano Díaz-Gaona
João Simões
José Carlos Casas-Rosal
Nuria Alòs
Llibertat Tusell
Raquel Quintanilla
Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez
author_sort Santos Sanz-Fernández
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The herd age structure, i.e., distribution of sows within a farm based on their parity number, and its management are essential to optimizing farm reproductive efficiency. The objective of this study is to define different types of herd age structure using data from 623 Spanish commercial sow farms. Additionally, this study aims to determine which type of herd age structure can enhance reproductive efficiency at the farm level. Results Farms are classified into three groups according to the quadratic function fitted to the percentage of sows by parities. This classification unveils three types of herd structures: type 1 (HS1) exhibits a concave-downward trend, with a higher percentage of sows in intermediate parities (mean of 45.5% sows between the 3rd to 5th parity); type 2 (HS2) presents a trend curve that is close to a straight line, with a gradual decrease in the percentage of sows per parity (approximately 2% loss of sows census per parity); and type 3 (HS3) shows an upward concave trend curve, with an increase in the percentage of sows in later parities (19.0% of sows between 7th and ≥ 8th parity). Parametric tests assess productivity differences between the three types of herd structures (p < 0.01). HS1 farms have the best productive outcomes over a year, with 31.2 piglets weaned per sow and year (PWSY) and a farrowing rate of 87%, surpassing HS2 and HS3 farms (30.1 and 28.7 PWSY; 85.3% and 83.4% farrowing rates, respectively). HS1 also have the lowest percentage of sows returning to oestrus (11.8%) and the highest number of weaned piglets per litter (12.8), compared to HS2 (13.2% and 12.4 piglets weaned) and HS3 (15.1%, 11.9 piglets weaned). These differences show a medium effect size (η2 between 0.06 to < 0.14). Conclusions This study shows the importance of herd age structure on sow-breeding farms as a factor of reproductive efficiency. The results endorse the proposed classification based on the curvature of the trend parabola obtained with the quadratic function to categorize herd structures into three groups. Additionally, these findings highlight the importance of considering the herd age structure in farm decision-making.
format Article
id doaj-art-528f4b1030344b22bce00fea10fbf41b
institution OA Journals
issn 2055-5660
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Porcine Health Management
spelling doaj-art-528f4b1030344b22bce00fea10fbf41b2025-08-20T02:22:29ZengBMCPorcine Health Management2055-56602024-11-0110111210.1186/s40813-024-00406-5The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farmsSantos Sanz-Fernández0Cipriano Díaz-Gaona1João Simões2José Carlos Casas-Rosal3Nuria Alòs4Llibertat Tusell5Raquel Quintanilla6Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez7Departamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, Universidad de CórdobaDepartamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, Universidad de CórdobaUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroDepartamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de CórdobaAnimal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA)Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA)Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA)Departamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, Universidad de CórdobaAbstract Background The herd age structure, i.e., distribution of sows within a farm based on their parity number, and its management are essential to optimizing farm reproductive efficiency. The objective of this study is to define different types of herd age structure using data from 623 Spanish commercial sow farms. Additionally, this study aims to determine which type of herd age structure can enhance reproductive efficiency at the farm level. Results Farms are classified into three groups according to the quadratic function fitted to the percentage of sows by parities. This classification unveils three types of herd structures: type 1 (HS1) exhibits a concave-downward trend, with a higher percentage of sows in intermediate parities (mean of 45.5% sows between the 3rd to 5th parity); type 2 (HS2) presents a trend curve that is close to a straight line, with a gradual decrease in the percentage of sows per parity (approximately 2% loss of sows census per parity); and type 3 (HS3) shows an upward concave trend curve, with an increase in the percentage of sows in later parities (19.0% of sows between 7th and ≥ 8th parity). Parametric tests assess productivity differences between the three types of herd structures (p < 0.01). HS1 farms have the best productive outcomes over a year, with 31.2 piglets weaned per sow and year (PWSY) and a farrowing rate of 87%, surpassing HS2 and HS3 farms (30.1 and 28.7 PWSY; 85.3% and 83.4% farrowing rates, respectively). HS1 also have the lowest percentage of sows returning to oestrus (11.8%) and the highest number of weaned piglets per litter (12.8), compared to HS2 (13.2% and 12.4 piglets weaned) and HS3 (15.1%, 11.9 piglets weaned). These differences show a medium effect size (η2 between 0.06 to < 0.14). Conclusions This study shows the importance of herd age structure on sow-breeding farms as a factor of reproductive efficiency. The results endorse the proposed classification based on the curvature of the trend parabola obtained with the quadratic function to categorize herd structures into three groups. Additionally, these findings highlight the importance of considering the herd age structure in farm decision-making.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00406-5Replacement rateCensus structureParityBreeding sowsReproductive performance
spellingShingle Santos Sanz-Fernández
Cipriano Díaz-Gaona
João Simões
José Carlos Casas-Rosal
Nuria Alòs
Llibertat Tusell
Raquel Quintanilla
Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez
The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms
Porcine Health Management
Replacement rate
Census structure
Parity
Breeding sows
Reproductive performance
title The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms
title_full The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms
title_fullStr The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms
title_full_unstemmed The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms
title_short The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms
title_sort impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow breeding farms
topic Replacement rate
Census structure
Parity
Breeding sows
Reproductive performance
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-024-00406-5
work_keys_str_mv AT santossanzfernandez theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT ciprianodiazgaona theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT joaosimoes theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT josecarloscasasrosal theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT nuriaalos theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT llibertattusell theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT raquelquintanilla theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT vicenterodriguezestevez theimpactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT santossanzfernandez impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT ciprianodiazgaona impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT joaosimoes impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT josecarloscasasrosal impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT nuriaalos impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT llibertattusell impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT raquelquintanilla impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms
AT vicenterodriguezestevez impactofherdagestructureontheperformanceofcommercialsowbreedingfarms