Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials

For evaluation and comparison of the effect of surface treatment (glazings, polishing with rubber wheel and diamond paste, and polishing with rubber wheel) on pressable porcelain (IPS Emax porcelain) surface roughness in comparison with non-treated surface. Forty-disc shaped specimens of baseplate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Abdulbasit Turki, Marwah Hussein Abdulsattar, Zahraa Nazar Alwahab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: middle technical university 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Techniques
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.mtu.edu.iq/index.php/MTU/article/view/1074
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832595184694591488
author Sara Abdulbasit Turki
Marwah Hussein Abdulsattar
Zahraa Nazar Alwahab
author_facet Sara Abdulbasit Turki
Marwah Hussein Abdulsattar
Zahraa Nazar Alwahab
author_sort Sara Abdulbasit Turki
collection DOAJ
description For evaluation and comparison of the effect of surface treatment (glazings, polishing with rubber wheel and diamond paste, and polishing with rubber wheel) on pressable porcelain (IPS Emax porcelain) surface roughness in comparison with non-treated surface. Forty-disc shaped specimens of baseplate wax with 10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness have been prepared. They were invested and subjected to lost wax technique in fabricate the pressable ceramic. Following pressing, they have been divided randomly into four groups: Group A: no surface treatments, Group B: glazing (paste, HT, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Germany) glazing (paste, HT, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Germany), Group C: polishing with burs (DIAPRO TWIST, EVE, GmbH, Germany), and Group D: polishing with burs (DIAPRO TWIST, EVE, GmbH, Germany) and diamond paste (All in one, RENFERT, GmbH, Germany). For each specimen, examination of mean roughness profile (Ra) was performed for total surface roughness description. Specimens were stabilized with the acrylic holder used previously in the initial polishing procedure. A contact stylus profilometer was used to conduct a quantitative measurement of surface roughness in micrometers (µm) for all specimens. The highest (Ra) value was for control group (1.9520), whereas the lowest values were in group D (Polishing by rubber wheel .4670. One-way ANOVA test showed a high significant value at (P <. 000), and LSD test showed a high significant value at (P <. 000) when comparison was established among groups. From the results of the current study, we can conclude the following; polishing procedure for the surface of pressable ceramic with or without diamond paste produced better surface smoothness than glazed surface and non-treated surface and polishing with burs could be an alternative to glazing to provide smooth surface.
format Article
id doaj-art-52528de097374aa993ed3832104206f2
institution Kabale University
issn 1818-653X
2708-8383
language English
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher middle technical university
record_format Article
series Journal of Techniques
spelling doaj-art-52528de097374aa993ed3832104206f22025-01-19T10:55:25Zengmiddle technical universityJournal of Techniques1818-653X2708-83832023-09-015310.51173/jt.v5i3.1074Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic MaterialsSara Abdulbasit Turki 0Marwah Hussein Abdulsattar 1Zahraa Nazar Alwahab2College of Health & Medical Technology - Baghdad, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, IraqCollege of Health & Medical Technology - Baghdad, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, IraqCollege of Health & Medical Technology - Baghdad, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq For evaluation and comparison of the effect of surface treatment (glazings, polishing with rubber wheel and diamond paste, and polishing with rubber wheel) on pressable porcelain (IPS Emax porcelain) surface roughness in comparison with non-treated surface. Forty-disc shaped specimens of baseplate wax with 10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness have been prepared. They were invested and subjected to lost wax technique in fabricate the pressable ceramic. Following pressing, they have been divided randomly into four groups: Group A: no surface treatments, Group B: glazing (paste, HT, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Germany) glazing (paste, HT, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Germany), Group C: polishing with burs (DIAPRO TWIST, EVE, GmbH, Germany), and Group D: polishing with burs (DIAPRO TWIST, EVE, GmbH, Germany) and diamond paste (All in one, RENFERT, GmbH, Germany). For each specimen, examination of mean roughness profile (Ra) was performed for total surface roughness description. Specimens were stabilized with the acrylic holder used previously in the initial polishing procedure. A contact stylus profilometer was used to conduct a quantitative measurement of surface roughness in micrometers (µm) for all specimens. The highest (Ra) value was for control group (1.9520), whereas the lowest values were in group D (Polishing by rubber wheel .4670. One-way ANOVA test showed a high significant value at (P <. 000), and LSD test showed a high significant value at (P <. 000) when comparison was established among groups. From the results of the current study, we can conclude the following; polishing procedure for the surface of pressable ceramic with or without diamond paste produced better surface smoothness than glazed surface and non-treated surface and polishing with burs could be an alternative to glazing to provide smooth surface. https://journal.mtu.edu.iq/index.php/MTU/article/view/1074Pressable CeramicSurface RoughnessProfilometerGlazing
spellingShingle Sara Abdulbasit Turki
Marwah Hussein Abdulsattar
Zahraa Nazar Alwahab
Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials
Journal of Techniques
Pressable Ceramic
Surface Roughness
Profilometer
Glazing
title Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials
title_full Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials
title_fullStr Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials
title_short Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials
title_sort effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of ips empress ceramic materials
topic Pressable Ceramic
Surface Roughness
Profilometer
Glazing
url https://journal.mtu.edu.iq/index.php/MTU/article/view/1074
work_keys_str_mv AT saraabdulbasitturki effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofipsempressceramicmaterials
AT marwahhusseinabdulsattar effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofipsempressceramicmaterials
AT zahraanazaralwahab effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessofipsempressceramicmaterials