Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser

Purpose of the study: To evaluate whether laser has got any advantage over electrocautery in performing gingivectomy procedure. Method: This was randomized split mouth prospective study where 17 patients having symmetrical gingival hyperplasia were treated with electrocautery and laser on each side....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Praveen Kumar, Vidya Rattan, Sachin Rai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-05-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242681500041X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850060896085213184
author Praveen Kumar
Vidya Rattan
Sachin Rai
author_facet Praveen Kumar
Vidya Rattan
Sachin Rai
author_sort Praveen Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Purpose of the study: To evaluate whether laser has got any advantage over electrocautery in performing gingivectomy procedure. Method: This was randomized split mouth prospective study where 17 patients having symmetrical gingival hyperplasia were treated with electrocautery and laser on each side. Intra- and postoperative parameters assessed were duration of surgery, bleeding, tissue sticking, postoperative pain and healing. The results were statistically analyzed and compared. Result: There were 7 Females and 10 Males with a mean age of 28.2 ± 11.6 years. The mean time taken on the laser and electrocautery was 16 (±8.05) and 16.7 min (±9.86) respectively and the difference was not significant. On laser side, there was no bleeding in 3 (17.6%) and self limiting in 14 patients (82.4%) whereas electrocautery side, there was no bleeding in 2 (11.8%) and self limiting in 15 patients (88.2%). Both electrocautery and laser were comparable regarding ease of use during gingivectomy procedure. Charring was observed on both sides although there was more charring on the laser side. Fibrinous slough was present on both sides at 24 h. Difference in healing was not significant at various time intervals. There were no significant difference in postoperative pain experienced by the patients among the laser and cautery group at different time intervals. Conclusion: Both techniques with proper adhesion to safeguards, can be used to remove gingival overgrowth with equal efficiency and wound healing capacity. There is no advantage of diode laser over electrocautery in performing gingivectomy.
format Article
id doaj-art-521145e2dfbb4e928b8771b0cbab02b2
institution DOAJ
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-521145e2dfbb4e928b8771b0cbab02b22025-08-20T02:50:26ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682015-05-0152697410.1016/j.jobcr.2015.04.005Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laserPraveen Kumar0Vidya Rattan1Sachin Rai2Ex Junior Resident, Unit of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh 160012, IndiaProfessor, Unit of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh 160012, IndiaAssistant Professor, Unit of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh 160012, India; Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 172 275 6831; fax: +91 172 274 4401.Purpose of the study: To evaluate whether laser has got any advantage over electrocautery in performing gingivectomy procedure. Method: This was randomized split mouth prospective study where 17 patients having symmetrical gingival hyperplasia were treated with electrocautery and laser on each side. Intra- and postoperative parameters assessed were duration of surgery, bleeding, tissue sticking, postoperative pain and healing. The results were statistically analyzed and compared. Result: There were 7 Females and 10 Males with a mean age of 28.2 ± 11.6 years. The mean time taken on the laser and electrocautery was 16 (±8.05) and 16.7 min (±9.86) respectively and the difference was not significant. On laser side, there was no bleeding in 3 (17.6%) and self limiting in 14 patients (82.4%) whereas electrocautery side, there was no bleeding in 2 (11.8%) and self limiting in 15 patients (88.2%). Both electrocautery and laser were comparable regarding ease of use during gingivectomy procedure. Charring was observed on both sides although there was more charring on the laser side. Fibrinous slough was present on both sides at 24 h. Difference in healing was not significant at various time intervals. There were no significant difference in postoperative pain experienced by the patients among the laser and cautery group at different time intervals. Conclusion: Both techniques with proper adhesion to safeguards, can be used to remove gingival overgrowth with equal efficiency and wound healing capacity. There is no advantage of diode laser over electrocautery in performing gingivectomy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242681500041XLaserElectrocauteryGingivectomyGingival hyperplasia
spellingShingle Praveen Kumar
Vidya Rattan
Sachin Rai
Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Laser
Electrocautery
Gingivectomy
Gingival hyperplasia
title Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser
title_full Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser
title_short Comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser
title_sort comparative evaluation of healing after gingivectomy with electrocautery and laser
topic Laser
Electrocautery
Gingivectomy
Gingival hyperplasia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242681500041X
work_keys_str_mv AT praveenkumar comparativeevaluationofhealingaftergingivectomywithelectrocauteryandlaser
AT vidyarattan comparativeevaluationofhealingaftergingivectomywithelectrocauteryandlaser
AT sachinrai comparativeevaluationofhealingaftergingivectomywithelectrocauteryandlaser