Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents

Abstract INTRODUCTION Non‐pharmacological complementary and supportive care programs (CSCP, e.g., music therapy) are provided in addition to standard medical care for persons with dementia (PWD). Care staff observations are critical in assessing the clinical impact of CSCP on PWD. However, little is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alaine E. Reschke‐Hernández, Martina Vasil, Emma King, Carson Woolums
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70091
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849424744145747968
author Alaine E. Reschke‐Hernández
Martina Vasil
Emma King
Carson Woolums
author_facet Alaine E. Reschke‐Hernández
Martina Vasil
Emma King
Carson Woolums
author_sort Alaine E. Reschke‐Hernández
collection DOAJ
description Abstract INTRODUCTION Non‐pharmacological complementary and supportive care programs (CSCP, e.g., music therapy) are provided in addition to standard medical care for persons with dementia (PWD). Care staff observations are critical in assessing the clinical impact of CSCP on PWD. However, little is known about care staff experiences of CSCP and what factors influence documentation of outcomes. We sought to understand how care staff in Kentucky describe the clinically meaningful impact of CSCP on residents and themselves and learn what conditions enable and prohibit documentation. METHODS Four care staff from four dementia care facilities in Kentucky (representing non‐profit, for‐profit; rural, suburban, and urban areas) participated in this qualitative multiple case study. Participants were selected to reflect diverse care roles, identities, and experience. We collected data from eight semi‐structured interviews (two per participant), 24 journal entries, four observations, photographs, and publicly available facility data. The use of multiple data types helped triangulate findings and enrich the analysis. Data were coded and analyzed for emerging themes. RESULTS Participants described CSCP as enhancing residents’ holistic well‐being and being person‐centered. CSCP also improved participants’ well‐being and enhanced their sense of purpose. Primary documentation barriers were lack of time, prioritizing resident care over documentation, and top‐down regulations. Technology both enabled and prohibited documentation, with routine being a key facilitator. DISCUSSION Our findings indicate that CSCP improve PWD's quality of life by fostering engagement, joy, and personalized care, consistent with person‐centered care principles. Staff also benefit from reduced stress and improved morale. However, barriers exist, including time constraints and documentation challenges. Results may inform directions for future research, translation of CSCP from research to practice, and feasible measurement of clinically meaningful outcomes. The study underscores the importance of addressing systemic issues and advocating for policies that support sustainable, quality dementia care while enhancing both resident and staff well‐being. Highlights Care staff view person‐centered care programs as vital for residents' well‐being. Complementary programs reduce burnout and boost morale in demanding care settings. Feasible documentation is crucial to track meaningful outcomes within time limits. Results emphasize the need for policies that support care staff and quality care.
format Article
id doaj-art-521041b92f644bb8a1f36a64b4cbe4f6
institution Kabale University
issn 2352-8737
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
spelling doaj-art-521041b92f644bb8a1f36a64b4cbe4f62025-08-20T03:30:02ZengWileyAlzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions2352-87372025-04-01112n/an/a10.1002/trc2.70091Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residentsAlaine E. Reschke‐Hernández0Martina Vasil1Emma King2Carson Woolums3School of Music, University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USASchool of Music, University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USASchool of Music, University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USASchool of Music, University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USAAbstract INTRODUCTION Non‐pharmacological complementary and supportive care programs (CSCP, e.g., music therapy) are provided in addition to standard medical care for persons with dementia (PWD). Care staff observations are critical in assessing the clinical impact of CSCP on PWD. However, little is known about care staff experiences of CSCP and what factors influence documentation of outcomes. We sought to understand how care staff in Kentucky describe the clinically meaningful impact of CSCP on residents and themselves and learn what conditions enable and prohibit documentation. METHODS Four care staff from four dementia care facilities in Kentucky (representing non‐profit, for‐profit; rural, suburban, and urban areas) participated in this qualitative multiple case study. Participants were selected to reflect diverse care roles, identities, and experience. We collected data from eight semi‐structured interviews (two per participant), 24 journal entries, four observations, photographs, and publicly available facility data. The use of multiple data types helped triangulate findings and enrich the analysis. Data were coded and analyzed for emerging themes. RESULTS Participants described CSCP as enhancing residents’ holistic well‐being and being person‐centered. CSCP also improved participants’ well‐being and enhanced their sense of purpose. Primary documentation barriers were lack of time, prioritizing resident care over documentation, and top‐down regulations. Technology both enabled and prohibited documentation, with routine being a key facilitator. DISCUSSION Our findings indicate that CSCP improve PWD's quality of life by fostering engagement, joy, and personalized care, consistent with person‐centered care principles. Staff also benefit from reduced stress and improved morale. However, barriers exist, including time constraints and documentation challenges. Results may inform directions for future research, translation of CSCP from research to practice, and feasible measurement of clinically meaningful outcomes. The study underscores the importance of addressing systemic issues and advocating for policies that support sustainable, quality dementia care while enhancing both resident and staff well‐being. Highlights Care staff view person‐centered care programs as vital for residents' well‐being. Complementary programs reduce burnout and boost morale in demanding care settings. Feasible documentation is crucial to track meaningful outcomes within time limits. Results emphasize the need for policies that support care staff and quality care.https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70091Alzheimer'scaregiverscomplementary and supportive caredocumentationnon‐pharmacologicalnoticeable and valuable changes
spellingShingle Alaine E. Reschke‐Hernández
Martina Vasil
Emma King
Carson Woolums
Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Alzheimer's
caregivers
complementary and supportive care
documentation
non‐pharmacological
noticeable and valuable changes
title Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents
title_full Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents
title_fullStr Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents
title_full_unstemmed Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents
title_short Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents
title_sort care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents
topic Alzheimer's
caregivers
complementary and supportive care
documentation
non‐pharmacological
noticeable and valuable changes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70091
work_keys_str_mv AT alaineereschkehernandez carestaffperspectivesofclinicallymeaningfuloutcomesfordementiaresidents
AT martinavasil carestaffperspectivesofclinicallymeaningfuloutcomesfordementiaresidents
AT emmaking carestaffperspectivesofclinicallymeaningfuloutcomesfordementiaresidents
AT carsonwoolums carestaffperspectivesofclinicallymeaningfuloutcomesfordementiaresidents