Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection.
Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging (DCE) as an integral part of multiparametric prostate magnet resonance imaging (mpMRI) can be evaluated using qualitative, semi-quantitative, or quantitative assessment methods. Aim of this study is to analyze the clinical benefits of these evaluations of DCE regard...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249532&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850240378644463616 |
|---|---|
| author | Farid Ziayee Tim Ullrich Dirk Blondin Hannes Irmer Christian Arsov Gerald Antoch Michael Quentin Lars Schimmöller |
| author_facet | Farid Ziayee Tim Ullrich Dirk Blondin Hannes Irmer Christian Arsov Gerald Antoch Michael Quentin Lars Schimmöller |
| author_sort | Farid Ziayee |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging (DCE) as an integral part of multiparametric prostate magnet resonance imaging (mpMRI) can be evaluated using qualitative, semi-quantitative, or quantitative assessment methods. Aim of this study is to analyze the clinical benefits of these evaluations of DCE regarding clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection and grading. 209 DCE data sets of 103 consecutive patients with mpMRI (T2, DWI, and DCE) and subsequent MRI-(in-bore)-biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. Qualitative DCE evaluation according to PI-RADS v2.1, semi-quantitative (curve type; DCE score according to PI-RADS v1), and quantitative Tofts analyses (Ktrans, kep, and ve) as well as PI-RADS v1 and v2.1 overall classification of 209 lesions (92 PCa, 117 benign lesions) were performed. Of each DCE assessment method, cancer detection, discrimination of csPCa, and localization were assessed and compared to histopathology findings. All DCE analyses (p<0.01-0.05), except ve (p = 0.02), showed significantly different results for PCa and benign lesions in the peripheral zone (PZ) with area under the curve (AUC) values of up to 0.92 for PI-RADS v2.1 overall classification. In the transition zone (TZ) only the qualitative DCE evalulation within PI-RADS (v1 and v2.1) could distinguish between PCa and benign lesions (p<0.01; AUC = 0.95). None of the DCE parameters could differentiate csPCa from non-significant (ns) PCa (p ≥ 0.1). Qualitative analysis of DCE within mpMRI according to PI-RADS version 2.1 showed excellent results regarding (cs)PCa detection. Semi-quantitative and quantitative parameters provided no additional improvements. DCE alone wasn't able to discriminate csPCa from nsPCa. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-51eb4a9c1d2c456db052df15bd59b1e3 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-51eb4a9c1d2c456db052df15bd59b1e32025-08-20T02:00:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01164e024953210.1371/journal.pone.0249532Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection.Farid ZiayeeTim UllrichDirk BlondinHannes IrmerChristian ArsovGerald AntochMichael QuentinLars SchimmöllerDynamic contrast enhanced imaging (DCE) as an integral part of multiparametric prostate magnet resonance imaging (mpMRI) can be evaluated using qualitative, semi-quantitative, or quantitative assessment methods. Aim of this study is to analyze the clinical benefits of these evaluations of DCE regarding clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection and grading. 209 DCE data sets of 103 consecutive patients with mpMRI (T2, DWI, and DCE) and subsequent MRI-(in-bore)-biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. Qualitative DCE evaluation according to PI-RADS v2.1, semi-quantitative (curve type; DCE score according to PI-RADS v1), and quantitative Tofts analyses (Ktrans, kep, and ve) as well as PI-RADS v1 and v2.1 overall classification of 209 lesions (92 PCa, 117 benign lesions) were performed. Of each DCE assessment method, cancer detection, discrimination of csPCa, and localization were assessed and compared to histopathology findings. All DCE analyses (p<0.01-0.05), except ve (p = 0.02), showed significantly different results for PCa and benign lesions in the peripheral zone (PZ) with area under the curve (AUC) values of up to 0.92 for PI-RADS v2.1 overall classification. In the transition zone (TZ) only the qualitative DCE evalulation within PI-RADS (v1 and v2.1) could distinguish between PCa and benign lesions (p<0.01; AUC = 0.95). None of the DCE parameters could differentiate csPCa from non-significant (ns) PCa (p ≥ 0.1). Qualitative analysis of DCE within mpMRI according to PI-RADS version 2.1 showed excellent results regarding (cs)PCa detection. Semi-quantitative and quantitative parameters provided no additional improvements. DCE alone wasn't able to discriminate csPCa from nsPCa.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249532&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Farid Ziayee Tim Ullrich Dirk Blondin Hannes Irmer Christian Arsov Gerald Antoch Michael Quentin Lars Schimmöller Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection. PLoS ONE |
| title | Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection. |
| title_full | Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection. |
| title_fullStr | Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection. |
| title_short | Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection. |
| title_sort | impact of qualitative semi quantitative and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249532&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT faridziayee impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection AT timullrich impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection AT dirkblondin impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection AT hannesirmer impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection AT christianarsov impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection AT geraldantoch impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection AT michaelquentin impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection AT larsschimmoller impactofqualitativesemiquantitativeandquantitativeanalysesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagnetresonanceimagingonprostatecancerdetection |