Perception and argumentation in the LK-99 superconductivity controversy: a sentiment and argument mining analysis
Abstract The announcement of LK-99 as a potential room-temperature, ambient-pressure superconductor sparked widespread debate across both traditional news outlets and social media platforms. This study investigates public perceptions and argumentation patterns surrounding LK-99 by applying sentiment...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Eunhye Kim, Wei Luo, Hunkoog Jho |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98554-3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The anniversary of the birth of Prof. L.K. Moshetova, Acad. of RAS
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments
by: Scott Aikin, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Argumentative trees. What it takes, what it leaves
by: Marianne Doury, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Guided Inquiry Learning Model Using Scientific Argumentation Activities to Improve Concept Understanding on Optical and Light
by: R. Rahayu, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Reviewing Argument Schemes for Legal Arguments of Statutory Interpretation
by: Eduardo Brandão Nunes
Published: (2022-10-01)