Mitigating adverse social determinants of health in the vulnerable population: Insights from a home visitation programme

Introduction: Low-income families are exposed to adverse childhood experiences and psychosocial risks that impact child development. At the KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital in Singapore, Kids Integrated Development Service (KIDS0-3) is a home visitation programme that aims to optimise the develop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Wei Hao Liang, Keith Wei Han Liang, Qing Rong Chan, Winnie Hwee Suat Goh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Medicine Singapore 2024-03-01
Series:Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Online Access:https://annals.edu.sg/mitigating-adverse-social-determinants-of-health-in-the-vulnerable-population-insights-from-a-home-visitation-programme/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Low-income families are exposed to adverse childhood experiences and psychosocial risks that impact child development. At the KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital in Singapore, Kids Integrated Development Service (KIDS0-3) is a home visitation programme that aims to optimise the development of children from low-income families. Method: Data comprising family demographics, maternal psychosocial risks and outcomes of child development were collated through a chart review of 469 mother-child dyads enrolled from June 2014 to October 2022. Results: Based on the Family and Adult Support Tool, 312 families (67%) were identified as moderate or high-risk. Children from moderate and high-risk families had poorer Bayley cognitive (mean 95.88 [SD 8.25] versus [vs] 98.44 [SD 8.72], P=0.014) and language scores (mean 87.38 [SD 10.35] vs 90.43 [SD 9.61], P=0.016] at 24 months of age, compared to the low-risk group. Children of teenage mothers had lower Bayley cognitive scores (mean 95.16 [SD 8.42] vs 97.76 [SD 8.55], P=0.037), and children of mothers who experienced sexual abuse had lower Bayley cognitive scores (mean 93.1 [SD 5.68] vs 99.7 [SD 8.17], P=0.013) and language scores (mean 82.3 [SD 12.87] vs 91.3 [SD 10.86], P=0.021]. Antenatal enrolment yielded better child language (mean 90.1 [SD 9.37] vs 87.13 [SD 10.79], P=0.04) and motor outcomes (mean 99.62 [SD 9.45] vs 94.72 [SD 9.51], P=0 .001) than postnatal enrolment. Conclusion: Psychosocial risks impact the development of children from low-income families in Singapore. Findings underscore the importance of early, integrated intervention for vulnerable families.
ISSN:2972-4066